Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perspectives on Civil Regulation, Firms, and the Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Local Regulation

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

A feature of contemporary regulation debates is the view that social and economic actors can produce a form of ‘civil regulation’ that can influence organisational behaviours and practices. The following chapter uses ‘firm size’ as a tool for exploring how civil regulation might affect firms’ environmental practices. It suggests that civil regulation is an unpredictable mechanism that affects firms in different ways. Yet it also suggests that large firms are likely to be affected by stronger civil regulatory influences, due to their greater levels of visibility and exposure. For small and medium enterprises (SMEs), civil regulation is likely to be more subdued, though recent evidence suggests it can, in limited circumstances, provide ‘problem-solving’ outcomes. Work is needed, however, to further understand the nature and extent of civil regulatory pressures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, R., Connell, L., & Flynn, A. (1998). Company size, environmental regulation and ecological modernization: Further analysis at the level of the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(5), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J., & Fraser, E. (2008). Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: Identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(3), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennie, L. (1998). Brent spar, Atlantic oil and greenpeace. Parliamentary Affairs, 51(3), 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, K., & Li, Y. (2000). Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F. (2002). Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(2), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7), 1168–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., & Slack, R. (2006). Public visibility as a determinant of the rate of corporate charitable donations. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté, R., Booth, A., & Louis, B. (2006). Eco-efficiency and SMEs in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(6–7), 542–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, S., Ferreri, L., & Parker, L. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra. (2015, March). UK Statistics on Waste – 2010 to 2012 (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1989). Business and society. South-Western Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfle, S., & McMillan, H. (1990). Media, political pressure, and the firm: The case of petroleum pricing in the late 1970s. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., & Smid, H. (2004). Reputation, corporate social responsibility and market regulation. Tijdchriftvoor Economieen Management, 49, 271–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and instruments for organising CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. (1995). Using non-governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance. Governance, 8(4), 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. (2013). Beyond responsive regulation: The expanding role of non-state actors in the regulatory process. Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guében, C., & Skerratt, G. (2007). SMEs and environmental communications: Motivations and barriers to environmental reporting. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. (2002). Regulating small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Environmental Law, 14(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., Kagan, R., & Thornton, D. (2003). Shades of green. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancher, L., & Moran, H. (1989). Capitalism, culture and economic regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, R. (2000). Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, B., & Jones, C. (2007). From government to governance: External influences on business risk management. Regulation & Governance, 1(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, B., & O’Mahony, J. (2004). The role of civil society organisations in regulating business. ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1466–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, R. (2006). A theory of consumer boycotts under symmetric information and imperfect competition. The Economic Journal, 116, 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, R., & Bansal, P. (2003). Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (Eds.) (2004). The politics of regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law & Society Review, 37(1), 51–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1981). Australian social responsibility disclosure: Some insights into contemporary measurement. Accounting & Finance, 21(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2007). The social licence as a form of regulation for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Law & Society, 34(3), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2011). The receptive capacity of firms – why differences matter. Journal of Environmental Law, 23(3), 383–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2014a). Civil regulation, the environment and the compliance orientations of SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 467–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2014b). Understanding SME responses to environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(8), 1220–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, J. (1971). Readings in organization theory. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, J. (1998). EM into SME won’t go? Attitudes, awareness and practices in the London Borough of Croydon. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 122–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., & van der Vorst, R. (1997). New recipe green reporting for small and medium-sized enterprises. Eco-Management and Auditing, 4(2), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D. (2002). Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: An examination of the impact of tri data availability. Accounting Forum, 26(2), 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, D., & Worthington, I. (2003). Researching the drivers of SME environmental behaviour: A study of the UK screen-printing sector. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(4), 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J. (2000). The regulator-regulated relationship and environmental protection: Perceptions in small and medium-sized enterprise. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J., Herd, A., Gerrard, S., & Horne, C. (1999). The climate and culture of environmental compliance within SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(1), 14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., Lawrence, A., & Weber, J. (1998). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, J., Walker, E., & Wang, C. (2008). Issues for small businesses with waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(2), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Blackburn, R. (2004). SMEs and their response to environmental issues in the UK. Small Business Research Centre, Kingston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Blackburn, R. (2007). The business case for sustainability? An examination of small firms in the UK’s construction and restaurant sectors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(6), 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revell, A., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). UK environmental policy and the small firm: Broadening the focus. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(2), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Enticott, R. (1998). Evaluating the links between locality and environmental performance of SMEs: some observations from survey and partnership programmes in the Greater Bristol area. Eco-Management and Auditing, 5(3), 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Hollingsworth, D. (1996). Improving environmental performance in SMEs. Eco-Management and Auditing, 3(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, M. (2002). Small firms and environmental management: Predictors of green purchasing in Western Australian pharmacies. International Small Business Journal, 20(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, B., Morris, S., & Bartkus, B. (2004). Having, giving and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Nguan, O. (1999). The biotechnology industry and strategies of biodiversity conservation: The influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(1), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M., Taylor, N., & Barker, K. (2004). Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(3), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer, S., Welford, R., & Hills, P. (2006). Engaging Hong Kong businesses in environmental change: Drivers and barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 416–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studer, S., Tsang, S., Welford, R., & Hills, P. (2008). SMEs and voluntary environmental initiatives: A study of stakeholders’ perspectives in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 15(2), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teknologist Institut (2010). SMEs and the environment in European Union. Report for the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1998). After privatisation? The many autonomies of private law. Current Legal Problems, 51(1), 393–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Gallup Organisation. (2011). Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation: analytical report. Report for the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D., Kagan, R., & Gunningham, N. (2009). When social norms and pressures are not enough: Environmental performance in the trucking industry. Law & Society Review, 42(2), 405–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (1999). The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(4), 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (2000). Small firm environmental ethics: How deep do they go? Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotman, K., & Bradley, G. (1981). Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Huijstee, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(5), 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, F. (2014). The new regulatory space. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49(1), 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2003). Managing corporate stakeholders: Subjecting Miles’s 1987 data-collection framework to tests of validation. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S., Abbott, B., & Heery, E. (2011). Civil regulation and HRM: The impact of civil society organizations on the policies and practices of employers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., & Lynch-Wood, G. (2001). A new paradigm for SME environmental practice. TQM Magazine, 13(6), 424–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., Williams, I., & Kemp, S. (2011). Compliance with producer responsibility legislation: Experiences from UK small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(5), 310–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., & Patton, D. (2005). Strategic intent in the management of the green environment within SMEs: An analysis of the UK screen-printing sector. Long Range Planning, 38(2), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. (2009). NGOs and corporations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Gary Lynch-Wood & David Horton

  2. Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, UK

    David Williamson

Authors
  1. Gary Lynch-Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Williamson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Horton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom

    Alberto Asquer

  2. Turin School of Local Regulation and Foundation for the Environment, Torino, Italy

    Franco Becchis

  3. Turin School of Local Regulation and Foundation for the Environment, Torino, Italy

    Daniele Russolillo

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lynch-Wood, G., Williamson, D., Horton, D. (2017). Perspectives on Civil Regulation, Firms, and the Environment. In: Asquer, A., Becchis, F., Russolillo, D. (eds) The Political Economy of Local Regulation. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58828-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation