Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 450 Accesses

Abstract

This final chapter carries out three tasks. First, it asks how far the empirical focus taken in the research has been useful in underpinning an analysis of democratic participation in Blackbird Leys, spelling out the ways in which such a starting point can make a valuable contribution to existing work. Second, it draws on the results from the fieldwork to ask what the case study of Blackbird Leys reveals about the ways in which deprivation really affects participation. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, it considers the theoretical implications of the findings, drawing on the fieldwork to consider how proponents of participatory democracy might respond to some of the criticisms they face, and in particular, to the challenges of minimal democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a fuller account of methodology and case selection, see the Appendix.

References

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. (2008). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., & Wright, E. (Eds.). (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I. (2016). Bread-and-butter politics: Democratic disenchantment and everyday politics on an English council estate. American Ethnologist, 43(2), 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2014). Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H., & Shumer, S. M. (1982). On participation. Democracy, 2, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, F. (1986). The problem housing estate: An account of Omega and its people. Oxford: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston Barrio. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dacombe, R. (2018). Responding to Democracy’s Critics. In: Rethinking Civic Participation in Democratic Theory and Practice. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58825-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics