Skip to main content

Participation, Democracy and Neighbourhood Poverty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Civic Participation in Democratic Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses some of the problems faced by participatory democracy by examining the relationship between participation and poverty in some detail. It introduces some of the methodological and analytical problems that need to be addressed if the relationship between poverty and democracy is to be analysed successfully. The chapter begins with an account of the prominent theoretical explanations for inequalities in democratic participation within the political science literature, suggesting that these can struggle to present nuanced accounts of poverty and its relationship to democratic life. It then corrects this by introducing the literature on neighbourhood effects, highlighting two prominent factors affecting the levels of participation in poor areas; social isolation, and social disorganisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Unsurprisingly, the residents of the estate have a long history of resistance against such labels. On 18 October 1972, a public meeting was held to protest the description of Blackbird Leys as a ‘slum’ by a local government officer. This is one of the few instances of the population of the estate attending such a meeting in large numbers.

References

  • Achen, C., & Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J., & Snyder, J. (2003). Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellettini, G., et al. (2016). Neighbourhood Heterogeneity and Electoral Turnout. Electoral Studies, 42, 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. (2004) An Analytical Perspective on Participatory Inequality and Income Inequality. Social Inequality: 667–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D., & Glennerster. H. (1998). Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, M. (2014). From Crisis to Crisis: Democracy. Crisis and the Occupy Movement Political Studies Review, 13(1), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C. (1977). The Local State: The Management of Cities and People. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C., & Dawson, M. (1993). Neighbourhood Poverty and African-American Politics. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 286–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs? London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearlove, J. (1973). The Politics of Policy in Local Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filetti, A. (2016). Participating Unequally? Assessing the Macro-Micro Relationship between Income Inequality and Political Engagement in Europe. Partecipazione et Conflitto, 9(1), 72–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1962). Urban Villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, B. (2002). The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy: a Case Study of Decentralisation/Participation in Montevideo. Politics and Society, 30(1), 51–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M., & Dantico, M. (1982). Political Participation and Neighbourhood Social Context Revisited. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M., & Lewis, M. (2000). Brownfields Redevelopment. Preferences and Public Involvement: A Case Study of an Ethnically Mixed Neighbourhood Urban Studies, 37(13), 2501–2514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R. (1979). Political Participation and Neighbourhood Social Context. American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The Social Consequences of Growing Up in a Poor Neighbourhood. Inner City Poverty in the United States, 111, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasinitz, P., & Rosenberg, J. (1996). Social Isolation and Employment on the Brooklyn WaterfrontSocial Problems, 43(2), 180–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, C. (1992). Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2006). Local political participation: The impact of rules-in-use. Public Administration, 84(3), 539–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J. (1995). Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1997). Public Opinion. London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S., & Schneider, W. (1987). The Confidence Gap during the Reagan Years, 1981-1987. Political Science Quarterly, 102(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., & Ladd, H. F. (2003). The effects of MTO on children and parents in Baltimore. In J. Goering & Feins (Eds.), Choosing a better life? Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment, 153–76. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing Up in Poor Neighbourhoods: How Much Does it Matter? Science, 243(4987), 1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, S. (2003). Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political research quarterly, 56(4), 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, W. (2014). Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, 1(2), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, de Graf, L. (2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy Local Government Studies, 36(4): 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L., & Goel, M. (1977). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. (2002). The Consequence of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. (1992) Culture and structure in the truly disadvantaged. City & Society, 6(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York, NY: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goodnds a the Theory of Groups Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2004). Citizenship in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patillo-McCoy, M. (1999). Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril among the Black Middle Class Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuschemeyer, D. (2004). Addressing Inequality. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, E., & Wright, G. (2013). Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. (1968). A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. American Political Science Review 62(1): 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1993). The Anatomy of Britain: Democracy in Crisis. New York, NY: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (1999) ‘What Community Supplies’. In Ferguson, R. and Dickens, W. (Eds.), Urban Problems and Community Development. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., & Groves, W. (1989). Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social Disorganisation Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. (2002). Citizen Participation in America: What do we know? Why do we care? London: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2002). Culture, cohorts, and social organization theory: Understanding local participation in a Latino housing project. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1): 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2004). Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. (2008). Four reasons to abandon the idea of ‘The Ghetto’. City and Community, 7(4), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. & McDermott, M. (2006). The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces, 84(3), 1697–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M., & Newman, K. (2001). Urban Poverty and the Truly Disadvantaged: The Rediscovery of The Family, the Neighbourhood, and Culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F. (2015). Economic Inequality and Nonviolent Protest. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1314–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigges, L., Brown, I., & Green, G. (1998). Social Isolation of the Urban Poor: Race, Class, and Neighbourhood Effects on Social Resources. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(1), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (2001). Political Equality: What Is It? Why Do We Want It? A Review Paper for the Russell Sage Foundation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J.-O. (1978). A Seven-Nation Comparison: Participation and Political Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (1995). The ghetto, the state and the new capitalist economy. In P. Kasinitz (Ed.), Metropolis: Center and Symbol of Our Time. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2006). Equinox. London: Cornerstone Digital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (1942). Street Corner Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Wilmott, P. (1957). Family and Kinship in East London. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dacombe, R. (2018). Participation, Democracy and Neighbourhood Poverty. In: Rethinking Civic Participation in Democratic Theory and Practice. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58825-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics