Skip to main content

Reception and Representation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1112 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the representation of the three female party leaders in a sample of election coverage taken from UK national newspapers. The analysis identifies a number of key themes in this coverage—noting that both gender and gendered styles of speaking were among press commentators’ preoccupations—and discusses some of the rhetorical and linguistic devices that recurred in commentary on the women. While the personalized, trivializing, and stereotypical representations found by other researchers were a salient feature of the press discourse sampled, there was also a clear trend towards positive representations of women’s performances in the debates, which can be related to the ‘different voice’ ideology of gender, language, and politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baxter, J. (2012). Women of the corporation: A sociolinguistic perspective of senior women’s leadership language in the UK. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1), 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, C. (2015). The battle for the stage: Broadcasting. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British General Election of 2015 (pp. 278–301). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B. (2015). Did Britain’s right-wing newspapers win it for the Tories? LSE GE2015, May 13 [online]. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/generalelection/is-it-the-daily-hate-co-wot-won-it/. Accessed 26 September 2015.

  • Carlin, D. B., & Winfrey, K. L. (2009). Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage. Communication Studies, 60(4), 326–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushion, S., & Sambrook, R. (2015). The “horse race” contest dominated TV news election coverage. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 11). Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. E. (2015). Twitter as political discourse: The case of Sarah Palin. In J. Wilson & D. Boxer (Eds.), Discourse, politics and women as global leaders (pp. 93–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (1999). Tabloidization of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett (2015). The election campaign’s invisible women, 30 April [online]. http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/blog/the-invisible-women-in-the-election/. Accessed 27 July 2015.

  • Harmer, E. (2015a). Men writing about men: Media and the UK General Election 2015 [online]. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/. Accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Harmer, E. (2015b). The right man for the job: The gendered campaign. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 15). Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Thorsen, E. (Eds.) (2015). UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign. Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and Women of the corporation (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: “Possessive, jealous and pugnacious?”’. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. (2009). Sexism and gender bias in election 2008: A more complex path for women in politics. Politics & Gender, 5(1), 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. (2015). The motherhood trap. New Statesman, 16 July [online]. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/07/motherhood-trap. Accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Loughborough University Communication Research Centre. (2015). Media coverage of the 2015 campaign: Report 5 [online]. http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/general-election/media-coverage-of-the-2015-campaign-report-5/. Accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Lünenborg, M., & Maier, T. (2015). Governing in the gendered structure of power: The media discourse on Angela Merkel and her power-driven leadership style. In J. Wilson & D. Boxer (Eds.), Discourse, politics and women as global leaders (pp. 275–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä, J., Isotalus, P., & Ruoho, I. (2015). The ball is in the women’s court: The portrayal of women as political leaders in Finnish newspapers. In J. Wilson & D. Boxer (Eds.), Discourse, politics and women as global leaders (pp. 293–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, H., & Hale, S. (2015). Digital disconnect: Parties, pollsters and political analysis in #GE2015. Elections and the Internet: Research from the Oxford Internet Institute, 12 May [online]. http://elections.oii.ox.ac.uk/digital-disconnect-parties-pollsters-and-political-analysis-in-ge2015/. Accessed 26 September.

  • McLachlan, S., & Golding, P. (2000). Tabloidization in the British Press: A quantitative investigation into changes in British newspapers, 1952-1987. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, L. (2012). Is she “Man Enough”? Women candidates, executive political offices, and news coverage. Journal of Communication, 62, 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, L. (2013). All the gender that fit to print: How the New York Times covered Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(3), 520–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (2015). Girls on top, who knew? The unpredictability of pollsters and publics. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 18). Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigny, H. (2015). Why can’t I vote for a female candidate? In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 19). Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetko, H. A., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2007). Reporting Germany’s 2005 Bundestag Election Campaign: Was gender an issue? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12 (4), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2015). The kitchen as the new campaign battleground: Changing notions of masculinity. In D. Jackson & E. Thorsen (Eds.), UK election analysis 2015: Media, voters and the campaign (p. 24). Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (2003). Sexism with an alibi. Guardian, 31 May [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/may/31/advertising.comment. Accessed 6 September 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cameron, D., Shaw, S. (2016). Reception and Representation. In: Gender, Power and Political Speech. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58751-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58752-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics