Skip to main content

Unveiling Consumers’ Insights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Eco-Innovations in Emerging Markets
  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

This section presents the results of data analysis for testing the theoretical concepts and framework of hypotheses built for the study. The technique to deal with missing values and normality are described. Descriptive statistical analysis for each construct and indicator is introduced. Afterwards, the analytical model related to the empirical framework is formalized in a set of simultaneous linear equations. Each equation is then analysed separately in terms of the two stages of PLS technique. The measurement model is assessed to estimate reliability and validity of the study constructs to continue with the structural model is determined and hypotheses are tested. A number of post-hoc analyses as confirmatory tetrad analysis, effect size, and predictive relevance tested the quality of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkesteijn, K., & Oerlemans, L. (2005). The early adoption of green power by Dutch households: An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy, 33(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. F. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, B., & Gillingham, K. (2012). Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Science, 31(6), 900–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, C. M., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H. (1999). Robustness of partial least squares method for estimating the latent variable quality structures. Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 435–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaño, R., Sujan, M., Kacker, M., & Sujan, H. (2008). Managing consumer uncertainty in the adoption of new products: Temporal distance and mental simulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (Applied social research method series). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modelling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares. Concepts, methods, and applications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C., Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2002). Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54(3), 243–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J. (2007). A new and simple approach to multi-group analysis in partial least squares path modeling. In Proceedings of the PLS’ 07 international symposium on PLS and related methods—Causalities explored by indirect observation (pp. 104–107).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Wilson, B., & Dijkstra, T. (2007). Testing nonlinear effects in PLS path models. PLS05—5th international symposium on PLS and related methods: Causalities explored by indirect observation. Norway: DECISIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in international marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). London: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J. (2011). Consumer eco-innovation adoption: Assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57(2), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables—Historical and comparative aspects. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, Part I (pp. 263–270). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvine, D., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2011). Helping ‘light green’ consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market. Ecological Economics, 70(3), 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3ed. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozaki, R. (2011). Adopting sustainable innovation: What makes consumers sign up to green electricity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, D. J., & Reise, S. P. (1994). Personality assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 45(1), 357–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). On measuring organizational properties: Methodological issues in the use of key informants. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, School of Business, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M. (2006). Segmentation for path models and unobserved heterogeneity: The finite mixture partial least squares approach. Research Papers on Marketing and Retailing, No. 35, University of Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2014). Smartpls 3. Hamburg: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönkkö, M., & Evermann, J. (2013). A critical examination of common beliefs about partial least squares path modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 16(3), 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Schwaiger, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2009). Determining the number of segments in FIMIX-PLS. In Proceedings of the 2009 annual conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, K. F. (1995). Confirmatory tetrad analysis with SAS. Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, C., Linn, R., & Jöreskog, K. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Henseler, J. (2007). Modeling reflective higher-order constructs using three approaches with PLS path modeling: A Monte Carlo comparison, Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy conference, University of Otago, Dunedin, pp. 791–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1975). Path models with latent variables, the NIPALS approach. In H. M. Blalock, A. Aganbegian, F. M. Borodkin, R. Boundon, & V. Cappecchi (Eds.), Quantitative sociology in international perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling (pp. 307–353). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1981). Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: Theory and application of partial least squares. In J. Kmenta & J. E. Ramsey (Eds.), Evaluation of econometric models (pp. 47–74). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wörsdorfer, J. S., & Kaus, W. (2011). Will nonowners follow pioneer consumers in the adoption of solar thermal systems? mpirical evidence for northwest Germany’. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2282–2291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reyes Mercado, P. (2016). Unveiling Consumers’ Insights. In: Eco-Innovations in Emerging Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58742-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics