Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Multilateral EU-China Dialogue on Africa within the OECD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU-China-Africa Trilateral Relations in a Multipolar World

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 4 is dedicated to the study of multilateral EU engagement with China on Africa. Based on the particular case of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC), the chapter focuses on the EU’s efforts to involve China in two multilateral development initiatives: the China-DAC Study Group and the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These include European founding countries of the OEEC, the USA and Canada.

  2. 2.

    Current OECD member states include Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the UK and the USA.

  3. 3.

    Out of the 34 OECD members, 21 belong to the EU: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK.

  4. 4.

    The two exceptions concern the vote in the formal adoption of acts of the OECD and the contribution to the general budget of the OECD. Unlike the UN and the World Bank, the EU does not contribute to the budget of the OECD. The EU does, however, provide financial support to a number of specific OECD programmes and projects, through non-compulsory budget contributions.

  5. 5.

    South Africa is one of the few exceptions as it also acts as a donor of aid to other African countries.

  6. 6.

    DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, EU, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zeeland, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Korea is the last member that joined the DAC in 2010.

  7. 7.

    EU member states belonging to the DAC are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK.

  8. 8.

    The Policy Division (POL), the Aid Quality and Architecture Division (AQuA), The REED and the STAT.

  9. 9.

    OECD peer reviews are soft-law mechanisms, which were developed by the OECD’s predecessor, the OEEC, as a tool to allocate funds under the Marshall Plan.

  10. 10.

    The NDB is also referred to as the BRICS Development Bank.

  11. 11.

    Special Session with Non-DAC Providers of Development Assistance of the Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris, 27 November 2007.

  12. 12.

    Initially, the UK, Nigeria and Indonesia acted as role of co-chairs. They were followed by The Netherlands, Malawi and Mexico.

  13. 13.

    The EU’s membership in the DAC is based on the European Development Fund (EDF), which is solely managed by the European Commission and runs in parallel to the aid programmes of individual EU member states (see Chapter ).

  14. 14.

    The same applies for the EU delegation to the UN in New York.

References

  • Abdel-Malek, T. (2015), “The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation: Origins, Actions and Future Prospects”, die Studies 88, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashoff, G. (2013), “50 Years of Peer Reviews by the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee: instrument of Quality Assurance and Mutual Learning”, die Briefing Paper 12/2013, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, J. B. (2012), “Creating a Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation”, Essay, Washington D.C.: Centre for Global Development (cgdev), October 2012, available at: http://www.cgdev.org/files/1426543_file_Atwood_Busan_FINAL.pdf

  • Birdsall, N. (2011), “Aid Alert: China Officially Joins the Donor Club”, Global Development: View from the Centre, Washington D.C.: Centre for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, M. and D. McNeill (2004), Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World?, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräutigam, D. (2010), “China, Africa and the International Aid Architecture”, Working Paper Series N°107, Tunis: African Development Bank (AfdB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2015), Ambition with credibility: explaining (variation of) EU effectiveness in international development negotiations, Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Fourteenth Biennial Conference, Boston, 5–7 March 2015, available at: https://eustudies.org/conference/11.

  • Carroll, P. and A. Kellow (2011), The OECD: A Study of Organisational Adaptation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, P. and A. Kellow (2013), “The OECD”, in K. E. Jorgensen and K. V. Laatikainen (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power, Abingdon and Oxon: Routledge, pp. 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillejo, C. (2013), “Engaging China on development”, FRIDE Policy Brief n° 151, Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahoud, T. (2008), “Serie Entwicklungsfinanzierung: Neue Geber in der Entwicklungskooperation”, die Analysen und Stellungnahmen 13/2008, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. and D. Diaz-Fuentes (2011a), “From ‘Club of the Rich’ to ‘globalization à la carte’: On the Successes and Limits of the Reform at the OECD”, Global Policy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. and D. Diaz-Fuentes (2011b), “The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 1961–2011: Challenges for the Next 50 Years”, Global Policy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. and D. Diez-Fuentes (2011c), “The OECD and Phases in the International Political Economy, 1961–2011”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 552–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CONCORD (2012), “EU sidelined at Busan Aid Summit”, 1 September 2012, Brussels: Concord, available at: http://old.concordeurope.org/shaping-development-policy/development-effectivness/item/118-eu-at-busan-summit

  • CONCORD and AidWatch (2011), “CONCORD AidWatch reaction to the European Commission’s Communication Proposal for the EU Common Position for the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Busan”, Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness, September 2011, Brussels: CONCORD, available at: http://www.cso-effectiveness.org/IMG/pdf/aw_reaction_to_ec_communication_final.pdf

  • CONCORD and AidWatch (2012), “Making Sense of EU Development Cooperation Effectiveness, Concord AidWatch Special Report on the post-Busan development effectiveness agenda”, Brussels: CONCORD, 27 November 2012, available at: http://www.concordeurope.org/187-aidwatch-special-report-2012

  • Cornelli, M. and R. Matarazzo (2011), “Rehashed Commission Delegations or Real Embassies? EU Delegations Post-Lisbon”, IAI Working Papers 11/23, Rome: Instituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU (2011), Council Conclusions, EU Common Position for the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Brussels, 14 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig-McQuaide, P., N. Costello and N. Köhler (2011), “Towards a truly global partnership for development”, Trade Negotiations Insights, vol. 10, no. 3, Maastricht: European Centre for Development Management (ecdpm), pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2008), “Aid Effectiveness and Non-DAC Providers of Development Assistance”, Consultative Findings Document for the Informal Working Group on non-DAC Providers of Development Assistance, Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Accra, 2–4 September 2008, available at: http://www.ipc-undp.org/publications/southlearning/penny.pdf

  • Deutscher, E. (2010), 10 Theses on the Future of Development Co-operation, Office of the DAC Chair, DAC/CHAIR(2010)7, Paris: OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC), 16 December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID (2012), Press release: UK International Development Secretary visit Beijing, London, 29 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O. and M. Strömvik (2003), “The EU as an International Negotiator”, Paper presented at the Eighth Biennial International Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Nashville, Tennessee, 27–29 March 2003, available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/6483/1/001526_1.PDF

  • European Commission (2011d), Proposal for the EU Common Position for the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Busan, COM(2011)541 final, Brussels, 7.9.2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyben, R. (2011), “Enabling Effective Development. What Goes On Inside DAC Spaces and Where Cares?”, Paper present at the LSE Workshop “Unpacking Foreign Aid Effectiveness”, London: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), 21 June 2011, available at: http://aidconference.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/eyben-paper.pdf

  • Eyben, R. (2012), “Struggle in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid”, European Journal of Development Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fejerskov, A. M. and N. Keijzer (2013), “Practice Makes Perfect? The European Union’s Engagement in Negotiations on a Post-2015 Framework for Development”, DIIS Report 2013:04, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, R. and L. Mah (2012), “European responses to Asia’s enhanced role as an aid donor”, CIES e-Working Paper n° 132/2012, Centre de investigacao e estudos de sociologia (CIES), Lisbon: Instituto Universitario de Lisboa (IUL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurría, A. (2011), “The OECD at 50: Past Achievements, Present Challenges and Future Directions”, Global Policy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 318–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenesch, C. and S. Grimm (2011), “Busan and the “new actors”: the story path to a shared understanding of effective development policy”, The Current Column, 17 October 2011, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, R. (2009), “From Rome to Accra via Kigali: ‘Aid Effectiveness’ in Rwanda”, Development Policy Review, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 581–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister, F. (2007), “Outsider or Frontrunner? Recent Developments under International and European Law on the Status of the European Union in International Organizations and Treaty Bodies”, Common Market Law Review, vol. 44, pp. 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPRCC and OECD (2009), The China-DAC Study Group. Sharing experiences and promoting learning about growth and poverty reduction in China and Africa countries, Draft concept note by Li Xiaoyun and Michael Laird, Paris and Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, H., S. Klingebiel and T. C. Mahn, eds. (2014), “How to Shape Development Cooperation? The Global Partnership and the Development Cooperation Forum”, Briefing Paper 3/2014, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • JICA (2012), An Overview of South-South Cooperation and Triangular Cooperation, February 2012, Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

    Google Scholar 

  • John de Sousa, S-L. (2010), “Brazil as an Emerging Actor in International Development Cooperation: A Good Partner for European Donors?”, die Briefing Paper 5/2010, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, K. E. and K. V. Laatikainen (2013), Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski, P. M. (2010), “Single voice, single chair? How to reorganize the EU in international negotiations under the Lisbon rules”, CEPS Policy Brief No. 207, March 2010, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keijzer, N. (2011), “Offense is the Best Defense? The EU’s Past and Future Engagement in Promoting Effective Development Cooperation: Ideas for Busan”, Ecdpm Briefing Note 30, Maastricht: European Centre for Development Management (ecdpm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2007), “Trends and Issues in Development Aid”, Working Paper 1, November 2007, Washington D.C: Wolfensohn Center for Development and Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2012), “The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation”, Policy Paper 2012–04, Global Views, Global Economy and Development, June 2012, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragelund, P. (2011b), “The Potential Role of Non-Traditional Donors’ Aid in Africa”, Issue Paper No.11, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. and R. Carey (2014), “The BRIC and the International Development System: Challenge and Convergence”, Evidence Report No. 58, Rising Powers in International Development, Brighton: Institute for Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2012), “The OECD: A Classic Sunset Organisation”, Global Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 117–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R. and S. McBride (2008), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. (2006), “Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co-operation?”, Development Policy Review, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. (2008), “The DAC as a Central Actor in Development Policy Issues: Experiences over the Past Four Years”, DIE Discussion Paper 7/2008, Bonn: Deutsches Institute für Entwicklungsppolitik (die).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. and A. P. Jakobi (2010a), “Introduction: The OECD as an Actor in International Politics”, in K. Martens and A. P. Jakobi (eds.), Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy-Making?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. and A. P. Jakobi (2010b), Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy-Making?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2012b), From Recipients to Donors: Emerging Powers and the Changing Development Landscape, London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E., L. Savage and S. M. Kim (2013), “A ‘Post-Aid World”? Paradigm Shift in Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum”, The Geographic Journal, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. S. and N. Nanda (2005), “Trilateral Development Cooperation: An Emerging Trend”, CUTS-CITEE Briefing Paper No.1/2005, Jaipur: CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics & Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1960), Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003), Rome Declaration on Harmonisation, High-Level Forum on Harmonization, Rome, 24–25 February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005a), The DAC Outreach Strategy, DCD/DAC(2005)18/REV1, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD), Paris, 29 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005c), The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, Paris, 28 February - 2 March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006), DAC in Dates: The History of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee, Paris: OECD Publication Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007a), Council Resolution on Enlargement and Enhanced Engagement, C/MIN(2007)4/FINAL, Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 16 May 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007b), Deepening Enhanced Engagement: Guidelines to Committees, C(2010)100/FINAL, Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 7 December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007c), The OECD’s Global Relations Programme 2007–2008, CCNM(2007)2, Centre for Co-operation with Non-Members (CCNM), Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008a), Accra Agenda for Action, Third High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Accra, 2–4 September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008b), The DAC Outreach Strategy: Revision of Outreach to non-DAC Donors in the Light of OECD Enlargement and Enhanced Engagement, DCD/DAC(2008)22/REV1, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD), Paris, 7 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008c), Establishing a China-DAC Study Group, DCD/DIR(2008)19, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD), Paris, 1 October 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008e), Strategic Reflexion Exercise: Progress Report, DCD/DAC(2008)60, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD), Paris, 26 November 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008f), Summary of the workshop on “Reducing Poverty and Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: China’s Experience in Rural Poverty Reduction at Home and in Africa”, DCD/DCA/POVNET/M(2008)2, DAC Network on Poverty Reduction (POVNET), Paris, 28 February 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009a), 2008 DAC Report on Multilateral Aid, Paris: Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009b), DAC Relection Exercise - Investing in Development: A Common Cause in a Changing World, Paris: Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD) and Development Assistance Committee (DAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011a), African Economic Outlook 2011, “Special Theme: Africa and its Emerging Partners”, Paris: African Development Bank Group, Development Centre, UNDP, Economic Commission for Africa, EU/ACP.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011b), Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Busan, 29 November, 1 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011c), Compendium of Written Proposals Received Based on the Third Draft Outcome Document for HLF-4, Meeting of the Group of HLF-4 outcome document Sherpas, Paris, 4 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011d), DAC Global Relations Strategy, DCD/DAC(2011)36/FINAL, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD) and Development Assistance Committee (DAC), Paris, 23 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011e), Fifth Draft Outcome Document for The Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, Busan, Korea, 29 November - 1 December 2011”, Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD), Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and Working Party on Aid Effectiveness (EFF), DCD/DAC/EFF(2011)18, Paris, 23 November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012a), Directory of Bodies of the OECD, July 2012, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012b), European Union DAC Peer Review 2012, Paris: Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012c), OECD Strategy on Development, Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 23–24 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012d), The OECD’s Relations with its Key Partners, Council at Ministerial Level, Paris 23–24 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ougaard, M. (2010), “The OECD’s Global Role: Agenda-Setting and Policy Diffusion”, in K. Martens and A. P. Jakobi (eds.), Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy-Making? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani, F. (2002), Peer Review: A Tool for Co-operation and Change, An Analysis of an OECD Working Method, Directorate for Legal Affairs (LEG), OECD, Paris, 11 September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulo, S. and H. Reisen (2010), “Eastern Donors and Western Soft Law: Towards a DAC Donor Peer Review of China and India”, Development Policy Review, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisen, H. (2009), “The Multilateral Donor Non-System: Towards Accountability and Efficient Role Assignment”, Economics, Nr. 2009–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckert, A. (2008), “Making Neo-Gramscian Sense of the DAC: Towards an Inclusive-Neoliberal World Development Order”, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds.), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabathil, G. (2014), “New and Old Donors: Complementing or Competing Approaches To Development – An European View”, Discussion Paper, 8th Berlin Conference on Asian Security (BCAS) “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility” 100 years after World War I – Pathways to a secure Asia, Berlin, 22–24 June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvat, V. (2002), “The Development of the Centre”, in J. B. d. Macedo, C. Foy and C. P. Oman (eds.), Development is Back, Development Centre Studies, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schricke, C. (1989), “La CEE et l’OCDE à l’heure de l’Acte Unique”, Revue Générale de Droit International Public, vol. 93, pp. 802–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. K. (2013), “Fostering African Development, Governance and Security through Multilateral Cooperation between China and Western Donors: The Case of the China-DAC Study Group”, in M. G. Berhe and L. Hongwu (eds.), China-Africa Relations: Governance, Peace and Security, Addis Ababa: Institute for Peace and Security Studies (IPSS) of Addis Ababa University and the Institute of African Studies (IAS) of the Zhejiang Normal University (ZNU), pp. 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stähle, S. (2008), “Towards China’s Integration into the Aid Donor Architecture: Learning from Chinese Participation in International Regimes”, China aktuell 3/2008, pp. 131–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney, D. (2015), European Climate Leadership in Question: Policies Toward China and India, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verschaeve, J. and T. Takacs (2013), “The EU’s International Identity: The Curious Case of the OECD”, in H. d. Waele and J. J. Kuipers (eds.), The European Union’s Emerging International Identity: View from the Global Arena, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. (2008), “From Reconstructing Europe to Constructing Globalization: The OECD in Historical Perspective”, in R. Mahon and S. McBride (eds.), The OECD and Transnational Governance, Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. (2009), The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R. (2011), “Fifty More Years? Reform and Modernisation of the OECD”, Political Insight, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. (2012), “The Anatomy of China’s Influence on the International Development Finance System”, RCCPB Working Paper, Research Centre for Chinese Politics and Business (RCCPB), Indiana University, at: http://www.indiana.edu/~rccpb/pdf/Xu RCCPB 28 Aid June 2012.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Europe, Bruges, Belgium

    Anna Katharina Stahl

Authors
  1. Anna Katharina Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stahl, A.K. (2018). The Multilateral EU-China Dialogue on Africa within the OECD. In: EU-China-Africa Trilateral Relations in a Multipolar World. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58702-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation