Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

The first chapter offers an overview of the current transition towards a multipolar world order. It draws attention to recent economic and geopolitical shifts in international affairs and presents key notions of International Relations (IR) scholarship. In particular, the chapter tracks China’s unprecedented economic growth and more prominent geopolitical role in Africa, and its consequences for the European Union (EU). In addition to examining novel analytical concepts such as BRICS and rising powers, it identifies specific gaps in the current literature on EU foreign policy (EFP). Finally, the chapter exposes the new trend of trilateral relations between the EU, China and Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the Hunt–Lenox or Lenox Globe, dating from around 1510, the reference “HIC SVNT DRACONES” (i.e. hic sunt dracones/ “here are dragons”) was placed on Southeast Asia.

  2. 2.

    In 2006, a recently discovered ancient map was unveiled in China and the UK. It provides new evidence for the voyages of exploration undertaken by the Chinese Ming Admiral Zheng He during the period between 1405 and 1435 (The Economist 2006).

  3. 3.

    Although the concept of rising/emerging powers is central to understanding IR, the theoretical literature remains contentious and authors refer to different notions such as “new drivers of global change”, “emerging non-OECD countries” or “anchor countries”.

  4. 4.

    The Republic of Rhodesia was an unrecognised state in southern Africa from 1965 to 1979, equivalent in territorial terms to present-day Zimbabwe. It was named after Cecil Rhodes, who was a British businessman and politician.

  5. 5.

    It is important to note that unlike the EU China doesn’t make a clear distinction between development aid and economic relations. China’s development aid to African countries is closely linked to Chinese economic interests and the Chinese leadership therefore refers to a “win-win cooperation”.

  6. 6.

    China’s current economic model is commonly referred to as a “socialist market economy”. The concept was introduced by Deng Xiaoping. Originally, the PRC’s economic system was characterised by a centrally planned economy. Since the reforms introduced by Deng Xiaoping in the late 1970s, China’s economic model combines a dominant state-owned sector with an open market economy.

  7. 7.

    As part of Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms, so-called Special Economic Zones (SEZs) were established in Chinese coastal cities in the 1980s. Unlike in the rest of China, in the SEZs market-driven capitalist policies were implemented in order to entice foreign businesses to invest in China.

  8. 8.

    The PRC, commonly known as “China”, was established in 1949, controlling mainland China and the two special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau.

  9. 9.

    Burking Faso and Swaziland remain Taiwan’s only diplomatic allies in Africa.

  10. 10.

    According to the OECD DAC, financial flows qualify as ODA if (a) they are undertaken by official agencies, (b) with the aim of promoting economic development and welfare of developing countries and (c) have a concessional character.

  11. 11.

    See: http://www.sais-cari.org/data/

  12. 12.

    See: Kitano, N. (2016), “Estimating China's Foriegn Aid II: 2014 Update”, JICA-RI Working Paper No. 131, June 2016, Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Research Institute.

  13. 13.

    These loans – also referred to as “preferential” or “soft” loans – are granted by the Chinese government on terms substantially more generous than market loans.

  14. 14.

    1. Mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. 2. Mutual non-aggression. 3. Mutual non-interference in each other’s internal affairs. 4. Equality and cooperation for mutual benefit. 5. Peaceful co-existence.

  15. 15.

    1. Respect the principle of equality and mutual benefits. 2. Respect the sovereignty of recipient countries and never attach any conditions or ask for any privileges. 3. Provide economic aid in the form of interest-free or low-interest loans and extend the time limit for the repayment when necessary. 4. Help recipient countries embark step-by-step on the road of self-reliance and independent economic development. 5. Help recipient countries complete projects which require less investment but yield quick results. 6. Provide the best quality equipment and materials manufactured by China at international market prices. 7. Ensure that the personnel of the recipient country fully master the technology being transferred. 8. Chinese experts will have the same standard of living as the experts of the recipient country.

  16. 16.

    Although the time frame of this research generally covers the period prior to 2009, this book also covers important changes of EU foreign policy following the entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty on the 1st of December 2009. In particular, the second case study outlined in Chapter 4 addresses the post-Lisbon structures of EU foreign policy.

  17. 17.

    The exact starting and ending dates differ slightly in each of the three case studies examined in Chapters 46.

  18. 18.

    Only those interviews carried out in Korea can be considered as rather marginal. They were conducted in the context of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness held in Busan in November/December 2011. The evidence gathered in Korea largely contributed to the second case study, exposed in Chapter 4.

References

  • Adebajo, A. and K. Whiteman (2012), The EU and Africa: From Eurafrique to Afro-Europa, London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, C. and L. Barber (2015), “EU-China-Africa and the Challenges of African development”, in J. Wouters, J.-C. Defraigne and M. Burnay (eds.), China, the European Union and the Developing World: A Triangular Relationship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 402–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, C. and E. Sidiropoulos (2009), “Africa-China-EU Cooperation in Africa, Prospects and Pitfalls”, Policy Notes, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, available at: http://www.nai.uu.se/publications/series/notes/PN-EU-0911.pdf

  • Alexandroff, A. S. and A. F. Cooper (2010), Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance, Waterloo, Ontario, Washington D.C.: Centre for International Governance Innovative and Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. C. (2013), “China’s ‘Win-Win’ Cooperation: Unpacking the Impact of Infrastructure-for-resources Deals in Africa”, South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armijo, L. E. (2007), “The BRICs Countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as Analytical Category: Mirage or Insight?”, Asian Perspective, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asche, H. and M. Schüller (2008), “China’s Engagement in Africa – Opportunities and Risks for Development”, Eschborn: Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (1992), The Practice of Social Research, Sixth Edition, Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, D. (2010), “The EU’s “strategic partnership” with Africa: Model or Placebo?”, GARNET Working Paper, No.80/10, September 2010, available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/garnet/workingpapers/8010.pdf

  • Balducci, G. (2010), “The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China”, East Asia, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, R. (2010), “EU Strategic Partnerships: are they worth the name?”, EPC Commentary, Brussels European Policy Centre (EPC), available at: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_1145_eu_strategic_partnerships_-_are_they_worth_the_name.pdf

  • Barton, B. and A. d. Bellefroid (2015), “China and the European Union in Sub-Saharan Africa”, in J. Wouters, J.-C. Defraigne and M. Burnay (eds.), China, the European Union and the Developing World: A Triangular Relationship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 371–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckley, M. (2011), “China’s Century? Why America’s Edge Will Endure”, International Security, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 41–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, V. (2010), “The European International Identity Considered from Outside: European, African and Asian Interaction”, in V. Bello and B. Gebrewold (eds.), A Global Security Triangle: European, African and Asian interaction, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 56–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, V. and B. Gebrewold (2010), A Global Security Triangle: European, African and Asian interaction, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendiek, A. and H. Kramer (2010), “The EU as a Would-Be Global Actor: ‘Strategic Partnerships’ and ‘Interregional Relations”, in J. Husar, G. Maihold and S. Mair (eds.), Europe and New Leading Powers – Towards Partnerships in Strategic Policy Areas, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 21–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2001), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, P. (2009), “Working with Cases in Development Contexts: Some Insights from an Outlier”, in D. Byrne and C. C. Ragain (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pp. 467–493.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bingran, D. and Z. Shuangquan (2007), “EU Perceptions in China”, in M. Holland, P. Ryan, A. Z. Nowak and N. Chaban (eds.), The EU Through the Eyes of Asia: Media, Public and Elite Perceptions in China, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Thailand, Singapore and Warsaw: Asia-Europe Foundation and University of Warsaw, pp. 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biscop, S. (2012), “EU Grand Strategy: Optimism is Mandatory”, Egmont Security Policy Brief, Brussels: Royal Institute for International Relations (EGMONT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, A., B. Littig and W. Menz (2009), Interviewing Experts, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bräutigam, D. (2009), The Dragon’s Gift. The Real Story of China in Africa, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräutigam, D. (2011a), “Aid ‘with Chinese Characteristics’: Chinese Foreign Aid and Development Finance Meet the OECD-DAC Aid Regime”, Journal of International Development, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 613–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräutigam, D. (2011b), “Chinese Development Aid in Africa: What, Where, Why and How Much?”, in J. Golley and L. Song (eds.), Rising China: Global Challenges and Opportunities, Canberra: Australian National University Press, pp. 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretheron, C. and J. Vogler (1999), The European Union as a Global Actor, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2015), The EU-China Relationship: European Perspectives. A Manual for Policy Makers, London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. and C. C. Ragain (2009), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2013), The European Union in Africa: Incoherent Policies, Asymmetrical Partnership, Declining Relevance?, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlnaes, W., H. Sjursen and B. White (2004), Contemporary European Foreign Policy, London: Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casarini, N. (2009), Remaking Global Order: The Evolution of Europe-China Relations and its Implications for East Asia and the United States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castillejo, C. (2013), “Engaging China on development”, FRIDE Policy Brief n° 151, Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaban, N. and M. Holland (2008), The European Union and the Asia-Pacific: Media, Public and Elite Perceptions of the EU, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaban, N., M. Holland and P. Ryan (2009), The EU through the Eyes of Asia: New Cases, New Findings, Singapore and London: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2006), Policy Paper on China’s African Policy, Beijing, 12 January 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2010), White Paper on China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation, Beijing, December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2011), White Paper on China’s Foreign Aid, Beijing, 21 April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2013), White Paper on China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation, Beijing, 29 August 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2014b), White Paper on China’s Foreign Aid, Beijing, 10 July 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council (2015), China’s Second Africa Policy Paper, Johannesburg: Second FOCAC summit, 4 December 2015, Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. J. (2015), The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. F. (2016), The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the EU (2003), A secure Europe in a better world, European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossick, S. and E. Reuter (2008), China-EU: A Common Future, Hackensack and London: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vasconcelos, A. (2008), “Multilateralising’ Multipolarity”, in G. Grevi and A. d. Vasconcelos (eds.), Effective Multilatetalism: EU Relations with Brazil, China, India and Russia, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), pp. 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vasconcelos, A. (2010), A strategy for EU foreign policy, EUISS Report N°7, June 2010, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaere, P. (2015), EU Coordination in International Institutions: Policy and Process in Gx Forums, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delputte, S. and F. Söderbaum (2012), “European Aid Coordination in Africa: Is the Commission Calling the Tune?”, in S. Grimm, S. Gänzle and D. Makhan (eds.), The European Union and Global Development: an ‘Enlightened Superpower’ in the Making?, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiCicco-Bloom, B. and B. F. Crabtree (2006), “The Qualitative Research Interview”, Medical Education, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dresch, P., W. James and D. Parkin (2000), Antropologists in a Wider World: Essays on Field Research, Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2006), “China beat Columbus to it, perhaps”, The Economist, London, 12 January 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004a), An EU-India Strategic Partnership, COM(2004) 430 final, Brussels, 16.6.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004b), Towards an EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership, COM(2007) 281 final, Brussels, 30.5.2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006b), Towards an EU-South-Africa Strategic Partnership, COM(2006) 347 final, Brussels, 28.6.2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2012), EU Strategic Partnerships with third countries, Library Briefing, 26/09/2012, Brussels: Library of the European Parliament, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2012/120354/LDM_BRI(2012)120354_REV1_EN.pdf

  • Faber, G. and J. Orbie (2009), Beyond Market Access for Economic Development. EU-Africa Relations in Transition, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioramonti, L. (2012), “Is the EU a “Better” Global Player? An Analysis of Emerging Power’s Perceptions”, in T. Renard and S. Biscop (eds.), The European Union and Emerging Powers in the 21st Century: How Europe Can Shape a New Global Order, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R. and A. Walter (2011), China, the United States and Global Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, V., W. Butterfield, C. Chen and N. Pushak (2008), “Building Bridges: China’s Growing Role as Infrastructure Financier for Sub-Saharan Africa”, Trends and Policy Options No. 5, Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. and F. Godement (2009), A Power Audit of EU-China Relations, Policy Report, London: European Council on Foreign Relations (ecfr).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, G. (2007), “In the Eyes of the Dragon: Chinese Perceptions of the EU as a Global Actor”, BICCS Asia Paper 1(4), Brussels: Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies (BICCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, G. (2011), “China, the EU, and the New Multipolarity”, European Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, G. (2013), “EU-China Relations”, in T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner and P. Murray (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations, Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 492–508.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, G. and E. Gross (2011), Perspectives for a European Security Strategy Towards Asia: Views from Asia, Europe and the US, Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L. and A. Bennett (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004), What is a Case Study and What is it Good for?, American Political Science Review, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R. (1999), “Conceptualizing the European Union as an International Actor”, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, R. H. (2001), The European Union in International Politics – Baptism by Fire, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. (2001), “The Diplomatic Face of China’s Grand Strategy: A Rising Power’s Emerging Choice”, The China Quarterly, vol. 168, pp. 835–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratius, S. (2011a), “Can EU Strategic Partnerships deepen multilateralism?”, FRIDE Working Paper n° 109, Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratius, S. (2011b), “The EU and the ‘special ten’: deepening or widening Strategic Partnerships?”, FRIDE Policy Brief n° 76, Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevi, G. (2012), “Why EU strategic partnerships matter?”, ESPO Working Paper 1, European Strategic Partnership Observatory (ESPO), Madrid and Brussels: FRIDE and EGMONT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevi, G. and G. Khandekar (2011), “Mapping EU Strategic Partnerships”, FRIDE Report, Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. (2012a), “The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) – Political rationale and functioning”, CCS Policy Briefing No. 7, May 2012, Stellenbosch: Centre for Chinese Studies (CCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. (2012b), “Job change in Beijing – Zhong Jianhua is China’s new “Mr. Africa””, African East-Asian Affairs/The China Monitor Vol. 69, 23 February 2012, Stellenbosch: Centre for Chinese Studies (CCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S., R. Rank, M. McDonald and E. Schickerling (2011), Transparency of Chinese Aid: An analysis of the published information on Chinese external financial flows, August 2011, Stellenbosch: Centre for Chinese Studies (CCS) and Publish What YouFund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. (2013), “BRICS – what’s in a name?”, Brief Issue N°44, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. and J. Jian (2012), “Conceptual Gaps on Global Governance between China and the EU”, in Z. Pan (ed.), Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 202–215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, E. (2008), “Chinese assistance to Africa: characterization and position regarding the global governance of development aid”, Global Governance N° 03/2008, Paris: Institut du développement durables et des relations internationales (iddri).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haass, R. N. (2008), “The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 87, no. 3, May/June 2008, pp. 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T. (2013), Charting Transformation through Security: Contemporary EU-Africa Relations, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harst, J. v. d. and P. Swieringa (2012), China and the European Union: Concord or Conflict?, Maastricht: Shaker Publishing BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. F. and B. D. Jones (2011), “How Do Rising Powers Rise?”, Survival, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W. (2007), “The Balancing Act of China’s Africa Policy”, China Security, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, M. and S. Thogersen (2006), Doing Fieldwork in China, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herolf, G. (2011), “Multipolar World at the End of the First Decade of the 21st Century: How about Europe?”, Central European Journal of Public Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, N. M. (2012), “EU Relations with “Emerging” Strategic Partners: Brazil, India and South Africa”, GIGA Focus Number 4, Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. and M. Smith (2005), International Relations and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Z. (2012), “China’s Evolving Aid Landscape: Crossing The River By Feeling the Stones”, in C. Sachin, T. Fues and E. Sidiropulos (eds.), Development Cooperation and Emerging Powers: New Partners or old Patterns?, London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 134–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husar, J., G. Maihold and S. Maid (2010), Europe and New Leading Powers: Towards Partnership in Strategic Policy Areas, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2008), “The Rise of China and the Future of the West. Can the Liberal System Survive?”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, J. and T. Wright (2008), “Rising Powers and Global Institutions”, A Century Foundation Report, New York and Washington D.C.: The Century Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (2009), “Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective”, World Politics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 188–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. I. and R. S. Ross (1999), Engaging China: The Management of An Emerging Power, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, K. E., A. K. Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K. Laatikainen and B. Tonra (2015), The Sage Handbook of European Foreign Policy, London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J. and J. A. Caporaso (1998), “States, Agency and Rules: the European Union in Global Environmental Politics”, in C. Rhodes (ed.), The European Union in the World Community, Colorado: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, M. (2013), “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo”, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 711–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappel, R. (2011), “The Challenge to Europe: Regional Powers and the Shifting of the Global Order”, Intereconomics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (1987), The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keukeleire, S. and H. Bruyninckx (2011), “The European Union, the BRICs, and the Emerging New World Order”, in C. Hill and S. Michael (eds.), International Relations and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keukeleire, S. and T. Delreux (2014), The Foreign Policy of the European Union, 2nd Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, N. and Y. Harada (2014), “Estimating China’s Foreign Aid 2011–2013”, JICA-RI Working Paper No. 78, June 2014, Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauthammer, C. (1990/1991), “The Unipolar Moment”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvales, S. (1996), Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laïdi, Z. (2008), EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative Power and Social Preferences, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laïdi, Z. (2011), “The BRICS Against the West?”, CERI Strategy Paper 11, Paris: Centre d’études et de recherches internationales (CERI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, C. (2007), “The Chinese Aid System”, CGDEV Essay, Washington D.C.: Center for Global Development (CGDEV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, B. D. (1971), China and Africa 1949–1970, Berkeley: University California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W. (2007), “What China Will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A., L., H. Liu, H. Pan, A. Zengn and W. He (2012), “FOCAC Twelve Years Later Achievements, Challenges and the Way Forward”, Discussion Paper 74, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, available at: http://nai.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:538478/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  • Lucarelli, S. (2007), “The European Union in the Eyes of Others: Towards Filling a Gap in the Literature”, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarelli, S. and L. Fioramonti (2010), External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, T., H. Fischer, Julissa, Gomez-Granger and A. Leland (2009), China’s Foreign Aid Activities in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, Congressional Research Service Report, 25 February 2009, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, N., C. Woodsong, K. M. MacQueen, G. Guest and E. Namey (2005), Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide, North Carolina: Family Health International (FHI) and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangala, J. (2013), Africa and the European Union: A Strategic Partnership, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. D. (1993), “Concentration, Polarity, and the Distribution of Power”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2007), “China and Africa: Emerging Challenges to the Geographies of Power”, Geography Compass, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. (2008), “The Long Legacy of Dorian Gray: Why the European Union Needs to Redefine its Role in Global Affairs”, Journal of European Integration, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, J. (2006), “Chinese Perceptions of the European Union: A Review of Leading Chinese Journals”, European Law Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 788–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, J. and B. Barton (2011), China and the European Union in Africa: Partners or Competitors?, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, G. (2002), 1421: The Year China Discovered America, London: Transworld Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missiroli, A. and D. O’Sullivan (2013), “BRICS – the Next Layer”, Issue Altert 38, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, N. P. (2014), Theory of Unipolar Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2010), “Europe: Rising Superpower in a Bipolar World”, in A. S. Alexandroff and A. F. Cooper (eds.), Rising States, Rising Institutions. Challenges for Global Governance, Waterloo, Ontario and Washington D.C.: The Centre for International Governance Innovation and Brooking Institutions Press, pp. 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morini, M., R. Peruzzi and A. Poletti (2010), “Eastern Giants: The EU in the Eyes of Russia and China”, in S. Lucarelli and L. Fioramonti (eds.), External Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor, New York: Routledge, pp. 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, W. M. (2015), China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States, Congressional Research Service Report, 20, October 2015, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel, P. (2010), “Redistribution and Recognition: What Emerging Regional Powers Want”, Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 951–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel, P. and D. Nolte (2010), “Introduction: Special Section on Regional Powers in a Changing Global Order”, Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 877–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, S. (2000), European Foreign Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2001), “Building Better Global Economic BRICs”, Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper No. 66, New York: Goldman Sachs, available at: http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf

  • OECD (2011a), African Economic Outlook 2011, “Special Theme: Africa and its Emerging Partners”, Paris: African Development Bank Group, Development Centre, UNDP, Economic Commission for Africa, EU/ACP.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015), OECD Economic Surveys: China 2015, Paris: OECD Publication Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016a), African Economic Outlook 2016, African Development Bank Group, Development Centre, UNDP, Economic Commission for Africa, EU/ACP, Paris: OECD Publication Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, M. (2004), “Global Views on the European Union”, Chaillot Paper No. 72, Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Z. (2012), Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S. (2010), “Irresponsible Stakeholders: the Difficulty of Integrating Rising Powers”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzi, R., A. Poletti and S. Zhang (2007), “China’s View of Europe: A Maturing Partnership”, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. (2008), Research Methods in Politics: a Practical Guides, London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigato, M. and W. Tang (2015), “China and Africa: Expanding Economic Ties in an Evolving Global Context”, Working Paper 95161, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, S. (2009), China’s African Challenges, London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, T. (2010), “EU Strategic Partnerships: Evolution of a Concept, from Amsterdam to Lisbon”, EU-China Observer, vol. 5, pp. 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, T. (2012), “The EU Strategic Partnership Review: Ten Guiding Principles”, ESPO Policy Brief 2, European Strategic Partnership Observatory (ESPO), Madrid and Brussels: FRIDE and EGMONT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautenet, A. (2012), “The EU’s Strategic Partnerships with Emerging Powers: Institutional, Legal, Economic and Political Perspectives”, in T. Renard and S. Biscop (eds.), The European Union and Emerging Power in the 21st Century: How Europe Can Shape a New Global Order, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. (2010), “Strategic Partnerships - a Contested Policy Concept”, Working Paper, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholvin, S. (2010), “Emerging Non-OECD Countries: Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization”, GIGA Working Paper No 128, Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. (1996), “Containment or Engagement of China? Calculating Beijing’s Responses”, International Security, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 180–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. (2005), “The New Strategic Triangle: U.S. and European Reactions to China’s Rise”, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. (2008), “China Eyes Europe in the World: Real Convergence or Cognitive Dissonance?”, in D. Shambaugh, E. Sandschneider and Z. Hong (eds.), China-Europe Relations: Perceptions, Policies and Prospects, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. (2014), China Goes Global: The Partial Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D., E. Sandschneider and Z. Hong (2007), China-Europe Relations: Perceptions, Policies and Prospects, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, D. H. and J. Eisenmann (2012), China and Africa: A Century of Engagement, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sicurelli, D. (2010a), The European Union’s Africa Policies: Norms, Interests and Impact, Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, G. (1977), The External Role of the European Community, Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E. (2008), European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2013), “Beyond the Comfort Zone: Internal Crisis and External Challenge in the European Union’s Response to Rising Powers”, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and H. Xie (2010), “The EU and China: The Logics of Strategic Partnership”, Journal of Contemporary European Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 432–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, P. (1988), The Star Raft: China’s Encounter With Africa, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, A. K. (2016a), “China’s Relations with Sub-Saharan Africa”, IAI Working Paper 16/22, Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumbaum, M.-B. (2009), The European Union and China: Decision-Making in EU Foreign and Security Policy Towards the People’s Republic of China, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stumbaum, M. B. U. (2012a), “How Does Asia View the EU?”, NFG Working Paper No.1, NFG Research Group Asian Perceptions of the EU, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumbaum, M. B. U. (2012b), “How to Make Strategic Partnership Work: EU Cooperation with China in Security Affairs”, Clingendael Asia Forum, The Hague: Clingendael Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumbaum, M. B. U. and X. Wei (2012), “Conceptual Differences of Strategic Partnership in EU-China Relations”, in Z. Pan (ed.), Conceptual Gaps in EU-China Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 156–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. (2014), Africa in China’s Foreign Policy, April 2014, Washington D.C: Brookings Institute, John L. Thornton China Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2006), China and Africa, Engagement and Compromise, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2011), The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonra, B. and T. Christiansen (2004), Rethinking EU Foreign Policy, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torney, D. (2013), “Outsider’s Perceptions and EU Influence in the World: The Case of Climate Change”, NFG Working Paper No.4, NFG Research Group Asian Perceptions of the EU, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, P. (2008), “Case Studies and Process Tracing: Theories and Practices”, in D. d. Porta and M. Keating (eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–239.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vezirgiannidou, S.-E. (2013), “The United States and Rising Powers in a Post-Hegemonic Global Order”, International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 635–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, R. (2012), Europe and China: Strategic Partners or Rivals?, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2011), “Emerging World Order? From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF”, Politics & Society, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 347–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waever, O. (1998), “The Sociology of a not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations”, Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1964), “The Stability of a Bipolar World”, Daedalus, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 881–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. and Y. Zheng (2013), China: Development and Governance, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2005), “China’s Search for Stability With America”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and W. Song (2016), China, the European Union, and the International Politics of Global Governance, Basingstocke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Werthmann, K. (2004), “A Field Full of Researchers. Fieldwork as Collective Experience”, Working Paper, Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien, Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (2001), Understanding European Foreign Policy, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, L. S. (2008), “Semi-Structured Interviews: Guidance for Novice Researchers”, Nursing Standard, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, R. G. (1997), “The International Identity of the European Union: Instruments as Identity”, in A. Landau and R. G. Whitman (eds.), Rethinking the European Union: Institutions, Interests and Identities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 54–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W. C. (1999), “The Stability of a Unipolar World”, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W. C. (2009), “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War”, World Politics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, J., T. d. W. d’Estmael, P. Defraigne and J. C. Defraigne (2012), China, the European Union and Global Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, J., J. C. Defraigne and M. Burnay (2015), China, the European Union and the Developing World: A Triangular Relationship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. H. (2012), “Beyond European Conditionality and Chinese Non-Interference: Articulating EU-China-Africa Trilateral Relations”, in J. Wouters, T. d. W. d’Estmael, P. Defraigne and J.-C. Defraigne (eds.), China, the European Union and Global Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 106–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Fourth Edition, Thousand Oaks and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G. T. (1988), “Africa in Chinese Foreign Policy”, Asian Survey, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 849–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stahl, A.K. (2018). Introduction. In: EU-China-Africa Trilateral Relations in a Multipolar World. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58702-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics