Advertisement

Hard Cases

Chapter
  • 363 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter examines two prominent surrogacy cases from the perspective of the professional model. The Baby M case from 1985 shows that a poor legal framework can do a great deal of harm to the people involved in surrogacy. Even though it was atypical, the Baby M case established the terms on which all future cases of surrogacy would be judged. The influence of this case is still evident in current practices and regulation, such as bans on commercial surrogacy and preference for gestational surrogacy where the surrogate is not the genetic mother. In the recent case of Baby Gammy and Baby Pipah where transnational surrogacy is involved, domestic law is still unable to provide a just outcome because policy makers are not prepared to make the changes needed to protect the welfare of surrogates, babies, and intended parents. The professional model is designed to prevent such outcomes.

Keywords

Transnational Surrogacy Baby Gammy Gammie Commercial Surrogacy Professional Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Back, A. (2014, September 2). Australian surrogate father allegedly abused twins from Thailand. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/world/australian-surrogate-father-allegedly-abused-twins-from-thailand-20140901-10b7m3.html.
  2. Bucci, N. (2016, April 22). Man pleads guilty to sexually abusing his twin surrogate babies. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/national/man-pleads-guilty-to-sexually-abusing-his-twin-surrogate-babies-20160421-goc83m.html.
  3. Farnell & Anor and Chanbua. [2016]. FCWA 17 (14 April 2016).Google Scholar
  4. Imrie, S., & Jadva, V. (2014). The long-term experiences of surrogates: Relationships and contact with surrogacy families in genetic and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29(4), 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jadva, V., Imrie, S., & Golombok, S. (2015). Surrogate mothers 10 years on: A longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and child. Human Reproduction, 30(2), 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelly, M. (2012, March 30). Kelly: 25 years after Baby M, surrogacy questions remain unanswered. NorthJersey.com. http://www.northjersey.com/news/kelly-25-years-after-baby-m-surrogacy-questions-remain-unanswered-1.745725?page=all.
  7. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. (2016). Pregnancy and reproductive issues. http://www.nationalmssociety.org/Living-Well-With-MS/Family-and-Relationships/Pregnancy.
  8. Sainsbury, M. (2016, September 25). New fears for Gammy: Loan sharks split family of Australia’s abandoned surrogacy baby. Sunday Herald Sun. http://www.pressreader.com/australia/sunday-herald-sun/20160925/282471413340694.
  9. Salkin, A. (1999, March 21). She’s come a long way, baby M!: Gifted child born amid a two-family uproar thrives. New York Post. http://nypost.com/1999/03/21/shes-come-a-long-way-baby-m-gifted-child-born-amid-a-two-family-uproar-thrives/.
  10. Sunstein, C. R. (2007). The catastrophic harm precautionary principle. Issues in Legal Scholarship, 6(3).Google Scholar
  11. Van Wichelen, S. (2016). Postgenomics and biolegitimacy: Legitimation work in transnational surrogacy. Australian Feminist Studies, 31(88), 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations