Abstract
This chapter follows the debates surrounding transnational family communication, with questions regarding the degree to which the ICTs bond families from afar. Two women’s stories represent the struggles all of the participants experienced in communicating with their families through ICTs. Each woman’s experience reflects the new female migration to the U.S.; one which is diverse rather than homogenous. They use ICTs in accordance with their gender but also their affordances to communicate. It becomes clear that their families’ sense of place and intimacy are destabilized. They reconstruct the family through their communication, which is embedded in ICTs and this has consequences for their relations, emotions, and identities. Terms are defined and problematized and the chapter ends with a summary of chapters.
My mother says, “daughter, how I wish I was a bird so I could fly.
back and forth!” (participant in this study).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. A. Agnew & D. N. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 313–330). London: Sage.
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
Alba, F. (2013). Mexico: The new migration narrative. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/mexico-new-migration-narrative.
Altheide, L. D. (1994). An ecology of communication: Toward a mapping of the effective environment. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(4), 665–683.
American Immigration Council. (2015). New Americans in Washington. Retrieved from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/new_americans_in_washington_2015.pdf.
Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy: Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1905–1923.
Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family Process, 50(1).
Baldassar, L. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247.
Baldassar, L. (2014). Too sick to move: distant ‘crisis care in transnational families. International Review of Sociology, 24(39), 391–405.
Baldassar, L. (2016). De-monizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 16(2), 145–163.
Baron, L. F., Neils, M., & Gomez, R. (2014). Crossing New Borders: Computers, Mobile Phones, Transportation, and English Language Among Hispanic Day Laborers in Seattle, Washington. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 98–108.
Boehm, D. A. (2012). Intimate migrations gender, family, and illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: NY Press.
Bradner, E. (2001). Social affordances of computer-mediated communication technology: Understanding adoption. In Proceedings From CHI EA’01, Extended abstracts on human factor in computing systems (pp. 67–68). ACM, New York: NY.
Brown, A.., & Lopez, M. H. (2013). Mapping the Latino population by state, country and city. Pew Research Center. Retrieved July 2, 2016, from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/08/29/mapping-the-latino-population-by-state-county-and-city/.
Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). Transnational families in the twenty-first century. In D. Bryceson & U. Vuorela (Eds.), The transnational family new European frontiers and global networks 3 (pp. 3–30). New York: Berg.
Cabanes, A. V. J., & Acedera, F. A. K. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media and society, 14, 916–930.
Carling, J., Menjvar, C., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012). Central themes in the study of transnational parenthood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(2), 191–217.
Castells, M., Fernanded-Ardevol, M., Jack, & Sey, A. (2009). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Castles, S. (2010). Understanding global migration: A social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1565–1586.
Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
City of Seattle. Department of Information and Technology. (2014). Information technology access and adoption in Seattle: Progress towards digital opportunity and equity. Retrieved from http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Tech/CofS_TechUse_r8single.pdf.
Cuban, S. (2013). Deskilling migrant women in the Global Care Industry. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dreby, J. (2009). Gender and transnational gossip. Qualitative Sociology, 32(1), 33–52.
Erel, U. (2010). Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology, 44, 642–660.
Ryan. L., Erel, U., & D’Angelo, A. (2015). Introduction: Understanding migrant capital. In L. Ryan, U. Erel, & A. D’ Angelo (Eds.). Migrant capital: Networks, identities, and strategies (pp. 3–17). Migration, Diaspora and Citizenship. New York: Routledge.
Faist, T., Fauser, M., & Reisenauer, E. (2013). Transnational migration. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Falicov, J. C. (2005). Emotional transnationalism and family identities. Family Process, 44(4), 399–406.
Foner, N., & Dreby, J. (2011). Relations between the generations in immigrant families. The Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 545–564.
Fortunati, L. (1995). The arcane of reproduction: Housework, prostitution, labor and capital. New York: Automedia.
Fortunati, L. (2007). Immaterial labor and its machinations. Ephemera, 7(1), 139–175.
Fortunati, L. (2011). ICTs and immaterial labor from a feminist perspective. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35(4), 426–432.
Francisco, V. (2015). ‘The internet is magic’: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173–190.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances (pp. 79–84). Cambridge: ACM.
Gergen, K. J. (2002). Cell phone technology and the challenges of absent presence, Swathmore, PA: Swarthmore College. Retrieved from http://www.swarthmore.edu/Documents/faculty/gergen/Cell_Phone_Technology.pdf.
Giddens, A. (1995). A contemporary critique of historical materialism: The nation-state and violence. Berkely: University of California Press.
Goulbourne, H., Reynolds, T., Solomos, J., & Zontini, E. (2010). Transnational families: Ethnicities identities and social capital. London: Routledge.
Grande, R. (2012). The distance between us: A memoir. New York: Atria Books.
Hannaford, D. (2015). Technologies of the spouse: Intimate surveillance in Senegalese transnational marriages. Global Networks, 15(1), 43.
Haug, S. (2008). Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 585–605.
Hearn, G. N., & Foth, M. (2007). Communicative ecologies: Editorial preface. Electronic Journal of Communication, 17, 1–2.
Hjorth, J. (2012). Mobile specters of intimacy: A case study of women and mobile intimacy. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 37–60). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Hoang, S. & Yeoh, B. (2012). Sustaining Families across Transnational Spaces: Vietnamese Migrant Parents and their Left-Behind Children. Asian Studies Review 36, 307–325.
Holmes, M. S. (2007). Oaxacans like to work bent over: The naturalization of social suffering among berry farm worker. International Migration, 45(3). Berkely: University of California Press.
Holmes, M. S. (2012). The clinical gaze in the practice of migrant health: Mexican migrants in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 873–881.
Holmes, S. (2013). Fresh fruits, broken bodies migrant farmworkers in the United States. Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000). Feminism and migration. The ANNALS of the American Academy and Social Science.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in shadows of affluence. Berkley: University of California Press.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (2003). “I am here, but I’m there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. In P. Hondagneu-Sotelo (Ed.), Gender and US immigration: Contemporary trends (pp. 317–340). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Horst, H.A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks 6(2), 143–159.
Hunter, A. (2015). Empowering or impeding return migration? ICT, mobile phones, and older migrants’ communication with home. Global Networks, 15(4), 485–502.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2014). Status of women in the States: Spotlight on immigrant women. Retrieved from http://statusofwomendata.org/immigrant-women/.
IOM. (2011). Glossary on migration. In R. Perruchoud & J. Redpath-Cross (Eds.), Internationl Migration Law. Retrieved from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/sitios/Observaciones/11/Anexo5.pdf.
Jarrett, K. (2014). The relevance of “women’s work”: Social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29.
Jones, A. J. (2008). A Silent but Mighty River: The Costs of Women’s Economic Migration. Signs, 33(4), 761–769.
Kao, G., Vacquero, E., & Goyette, K. (2013). Education and immigration. Cambridge: Polity.
King-O’riain, C. R. (2015). Emotional streaming and transconnectivity: Skype and emotion practices in transnational families in Ireland. Global Networks, 15(2), 256–273.
Kofman, E. (1999). Female birds of passage a decade later: Gender and immigration in the European Union. International Migration Review, 33(2), 269.
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and loses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Compositions, 22, 5–22.
Lasen, A. (2004). Affective technologies: Emotions and mobile phone. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/472410/Affective_Technologies._Emotions_and_Mobile_Phones.
Leach, L. (2016). Broadband Internet for economic growth in rural Washington: More please! Retrieved from http://thelens.news/2016/03/16/broadband-internet-economic-growth-rural-washington-please/.
Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holiday: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs, 12(3), 440–453.
Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. In A. Portes & J. Dewind (Eds.), Rethinking migration: New theoretical and empirical perspective (pp. 181–218). New York: Berghahn Books.
Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscope. Society and Space, 22, 135–156.
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language and Social Interactions, 45(4), 399–429.
Longhurst, R. (2013). Using Skype to mother: Bodies, emotions, visuality, and screens. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31, 664–679.
Lopez, H. M., Gonzalez-Barrerra, A. & Patten, E. (2013). Closing the digital divide: Latinos and technology adoption. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2013/03/Latinos_Social_Media_and_Mobile_Tech_03–2013_final.pdf.
Madianou, M. (2015). Digital inequality and second-order disasters: Social media in the typhoon haiyan recovery. Social Media + Society, 1–11.
Madianou, M. & Miller, D. (2011). Crafting love: Letters and cassette tapes in transnational Filipino family communication.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. London: Routledge.
Mahler, J. S. (2001). Transnational relationships: The struggle to communicate across borders. Identities, 7(4), 583–619.
Mahler, S. J., & Pessar, P. R. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers brings gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 27–63.
Mahler, J. S., Chaudhri, M., & Patil, V. (2015). Scaling intersectionality: Advancing feminist analysis of transnational families. Sex Roles, 73, 100–112.
Manjoo, F. (2016). For millions of immigrants, a common language: WhatsApp. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/21/technology/for-millions-of-immigrants-a-common-language-whatsapp.html?_r=0.
Mares, M. T. (2013). “Here we have the food bank”: Latino/a immigration and contradictions of emergency food. Food and Foodways, 21(1), 1–21.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
McHugh, M., & Morawski, M. (2016). Comparison of sociodemographic characteristic of native-and foreign-born adults in King County, Washington. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/immigrants-and-wioa-services-comparison-sociodemographic-characteristics-native-and-foreign.
McKay, D. (2005). Migration and the sensuous geographies of re-emplacement in the Philippines. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26(1), 75–91.
Mckay, D. (2007). ‘Sending dollars shows feelings’—Emotions and economies in Filipino migration. Mobilities, 2, 175–194.
Migration Policy Institute. (2014). State immigration data profiles. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/state-immigration-data-profiles.
Morgan, G. H. D. (2011). Locating ‘family practices’. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 14.
Morokvasic, M. (1986). Birds of Passage are also Women. International Migration Review, 18(4), 886.
Muse-Orlinoff, L., & Fischer, L. P. (2010). Introduction. In W. A. Cornelius, D. FitzGerald, J. Hernandez-Diaz, & C. Borger (Eds.), Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A transnational community in Oaxaca and California (Ccis Anthologies). San Diego: Center for Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, UC San Diego.
Newell, C. B. & Gomez, R. (2015). Informal networks, phones and Facebook: Information seeking and technology use by undocumented migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73434/123_ready.pdf?sequence=2.
Nielsen, K., Tiwari, A., Pasquini, D., Solorzano, L., & Wejebe, M. (2010). The family dynamics of Tunkaseno migration. In W. A. Cornelius, D. S. FitzGerald, P. L. Fischer, & L. Muse-orlinoff (Eds.), Mexican migration and the US economic crisis: A transnational perspective. San Diego: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, UC San Diego.
Palackal, A., Mbatia, P. N., Dzorgbo, D. B., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Are mobile phones changing social networks? A longitudinal study of core networks in Kerala. New Media & Society, 13(3), 391–410.
Parchoma, G., & Wright, S. (2011). Technologies for learning? An actor-network theory critique of affordances. Research on Mobile learning Research in Learning Technology, 19, 247–258.
Parkhurst, E. (2015). Seattle is fourth-richest city in the U.S. Puget Sound Business Journal. November 5, 2015. Retrieved at: https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/techflash/2015/11/seattle-is-fourth-richest-city-in-the-u-s.html.
Parrenas, R. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27, 361–390.
Parrenas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gender woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Parrenas, R. S. (2008). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Perez, M. A. (2015). The cosmopolitan dilemma: Fantasy, work and the experiences of Mexican au pairs in the USA. In R. Cox (Ed.), Au pairs’ lives in global context: Sisters or servants (pp. 310–334). Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pew Research Center, U.S Census. (1960–2014). Statistical portrait of the foreign-born population in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-the-foreign-born-population-in-the-united-states-trends/.
Portes, A., Luis, E., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promises of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.
Rosenblum, J. (2017). Beyond $15: Immigrant workers: workers, Faith activists, nd the revival of the labor movement. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ruiz, A. G., Zong, J., & Batalova, J. (2015). Immigrant women in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrant-women-united-states.
Sandu, A. (2013). Transnational homemaking practices: Identity, belonging and informal learning. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(4), 496–512.
Segura, A. D., & Zavella, P. (2008). Introduction: Gendered borderlands. Gender & Society, 22, 537–545.
Skrbis, Z. (2008). Transnational families: Theorizing migration, emotions and belonging. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29, 231–246.
Smith, A., & Page, D. (2015). U.S smartphone use in 2015. PewResearchCenter. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.
Thomas, M., & Lim, S. S. (2011). Migrant workers’ use of ICTs for interpersonal communication: The experience of female domestic workers in Singapore. In Communication and New Media Program, National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.media-anthropology.net/thomas_lim_migrant_workers_ICT.pdf.
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods -Routledge advances in research method. New York: Routledge.
Vertovec, S. (2004). Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 4(2), 219–224.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Research Review in Education, 34, 179–225.
Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians. (2012). How immigrants are capitalizing on new technology. Diaspora Digital, Retrieved from http://welcomingcenter.org/.
Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, Kristen, Boase, J., Carrasco, J., Cote, R., et al. (2005). Connected lives: The project. In P. Purcell (Ed.), Networked neighbor (pp. 1–50). Berlin: Springer.
White, A., Laoire, C. N., Tyrell, N., & Carpena-Mendez, F. (2011). Children’s roles in transnational migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 37(8), 1159–1170.
Wilding, R. (2006). Virtual intimacies. Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6, 125–142.
Wilken, R. (2012). Bonds and bridges: Mobile phone use and social capital debates. In R. Ling & S. W. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile communication: Bringing us together and tearing us apart (pp. 127–150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactional Publishers.
Williams, A., Amderson, K., & Dourish, P. (2008). Anchored mobilities. Mobile technology and transnational migration. Proceedings from the 7th ACM conference on Designing Interactive Systems.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cuban, S. (2017). Introduction: “I Wish I Was a Bird”. In: Transnational Family Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58644-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58644-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58643-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58644-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)