Abstract
The historical variations in the definition of the notion of culture, along with the variations of so-called cultural geography are well known; these have led to the disapproval of naturalistic and ecological perspectives, and to a greater consideration of intersubjectivity and of political and social processes in the construction of identity. But this renewal of academic paradigms should not blind us to the fact that many of them sprung from contemporary societies as imaginary figures, enabling social and geographical forms to take place. In looking through identity and territorial tensions in mountain regions in the world, this chapter aims to show the presence and role of those imaginary figures in contemporary societies.
This paper is an almost complete translation of a paper published in Annales de Géographie, 2008, 660–661, 90–115, called “Construits identitaires et imaginaires de la territorialité: variations autour de la figure du « montagnard »”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In French, montagnards has been the main word used for designating individuals living in mountain regions for centuries, both among scientists and in ordinary language. The same word has been common for pointing at mountain climbers since the mid-nineteenth century. It is only from the mid-twentieth century that it has become common to talk about populations de montagne. In English, ‘mountaineer’ was equivalent to ‘montagnards’ until the mid-nineteenth century; then, the word became reserved for climbers and sportsmen, individuals living in the so-called mountain regions being mostly named ‘mountain populations’ or ‘mountain people’. Some regional appellations have been adopted such as hillbilly in the Appalachian mountains and highlander in Scotland, both loaded with many connotations which will be commented later in this chapter.
- 2.
See for example David Barkin and Michèle Dominy, 2001, ‘Mountain lands: regions of refuge or ecosystems for humanity?’ in B. Debarbieux and F. Gillet, op. cit., pp. 71–77.
Bibliography
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berg, P., & Dasmann, R. (1978). Reinhabiting California. In P. Berg (Ed.), Reinhabiting a separate country: A bioregional anthology of Northern California (pp. 217–220). San Francisco: Planet Drum.
Bernbaum, E. (1998). Sacred mountains of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blanckaert, C. (1993). Buffon and the natural history of man: Writing history and the ‘foundational myth’ of anthropology. History of the Human Sciences, 6(1), 13–50.
Bretherton, C. (2001). Ecocentric identity and transformation politics. International Journal of Peace Studies, 6. http://www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol6_2/Bretherton.htm
Broc, N. (1974). La géographie des philosophes: géographes et voyageurs français au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Éditions Ophrys.
Broc, N. (1991). Les montagnes au siècle des Lumières. Paris: CTHS.
Byers, E. A. (1998). The mountain forum. Unasylva, 49(195), 13–19.
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Célérier, J. (1938). La montagne au Maroc, essai de définition et de classification. Hesperis, XXV, 109–180.
Clark, R. W. (1953). The Victorian mountaineers. London: BT Batsford.
Cognat, B. (1973). La Montagne colonisée. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.
Debarbieux, B. (2008). Construits identitaires et imaginaires de la territorialité: variations autour de la figure du ‘montagnard’. Annales de géographie, 660–661, 90–115.
Debarbieux, B., & Gillet, F. (Eds.). (2000). Mountain regions: A research subject? Brussels: European Commission.
Debarbieux, B., & Price, M. (2008). Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good. Geopolitics, 13(1), 148–168.
Debarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2008). Linking mountain identities throughout the world: The experience of Swiss municipalities. Cultural Geography, 15(4), 497–517.
Debarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2015). The mountain: A political history from the enlightenment to the present. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.
Evans, M.-L., Santelli, R., & George-Warren, H. (2004). The Appalachians: America’s first and last frontier. London: Random House.
Funnell, D., & Parish, R. (2001). Mountain environments and communities. London: Routledge.
Georges Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon. (1778). Supplément à l’ Histoire naturelle, tome IV. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.
Guérin, J.-P. (1984). L’Aménagement de la montagne en France: politique, discours et production d’espaces dans les Alpes du Nord. Gap: Ophrys.
Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Ives, J. (2002). Along a steep pathway. Our Planet, UNEP Magazine, 131, 3–5.
Kapos, V., et al. (2000). Developing a map of the world’s mountain forests. In M. Price & N. Butt (Eds.), Forests in sustainable mountain development: A state-of knowledge report for 2000. Wallingford: CAB International.
Leclerc, G. L. comte de Buffon. (1749). Histoire naturelle générale et particulière, tome III. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.
Lejeune, D. (1988). Les alpinistes en France: 1875–1919. Etude d’histoire sociale, étude de mentalité. Paris: CTHS.
Lewis, H. M., Johnston, L., & Askins, D. (1978). Colonialism in modern America: The Appalachian case. Boone: Appalachian Consortium Press.
McGinnis, M. V. (Ed.). (1999). Bioregionalism. London: Routledge.
Messerli, B., & Bernbaum, E. (2004). The role of culture, education, and science for sustainable mountain development. In M. F. Price, L. Jansky, & A. Iatsenia (Eds.), Key issues for mountain areas. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Messerli, B., & Ives, J. (Eds.). (1997). Mountains of the world: A global priority. London: Parthenon.
Mondada, L. (2001). La ‘montagne’ comme objet de savoir co-construit dans le débat scientifique. Revue de Géographie Alpine, 89(2), 79–92.
Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Otero, G. (2004). Global economy, local politics: Indigenous struggles, civil society and democracy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 325–346.
Price, M., Jansky, L., & Iatsenia, A. (2004a). Key issues for mountain areas. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Price, M., Lysenko, I., & Gloersen, E. (2004b). Delineating Europe’s mountains. Revue de Géographie Alpine/Journal of Alpine Studies, 2, 61–86.
Ramakrishnan, P. S., Saxena, K. G., & Rao, K. S. (2006). Shifting agriculture and sustainable development of North-Eastern India: Tradition in transition. New Delhi/Oxford: UNESCO and IBH Publishers.
Remy, P. (2001). Un lobby territorial et l’expertise scientifique. In B. Debarbieux & P.-A. Landel (Eds.), La montagne entre science et politique. Grenoble: Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities. London: Sage.
Rudaz, G., & Debarbieux, B. (2013). La montagne suisse: un objet politique incertain. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires romandes.
Sale, K. (1985). Dwellers in the land: The bioregional vision. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
Sarmiento, F., Romero, H., & Messerli, B. (1999). The Andean Mountain Association, the International Geographical Union, and Alexander Von Humboldt on Mount Chimborazo. International Geographical Union Bulletin, 49(2), 161–164.
Stone, P. (Ed.). (1992). The state of the world’s mountains. London: Zed Books.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tissot, L. (2004). Du touriste au guide de montagne: la question de l’identité Alpine (1850–1920). In D. Grange (Ed.), L’espace alpin et la modernité. Bilans et perspectives au tournant du siècle. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Trevor-Roper, H. (1983). The highland tradition of Scotland. In E. Hobsbawn & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walter, F. (2004). Les figures paysagères de la nation. Paris: EHESS.
Whisnant, D. E. (1980). Modernizing the mountaineer. New York: Burt Franklin.
Whymper, E. (1900). Scrambles amongst the Alps in the years 1860–69. London: John Murray.
Zimmer, O. (1998). In search of natural identity: Alpine landscape and the reconstruction of the Swiss nation. Comparative Studies of Society and History, 40, 637–665.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Debarbieux, B. (2018). How Can One Be a ‘Montagnard’? Social and Political Expressions of Modern Imaginaries of Territoriality. In: Kakalis, C., Goetsch, E. (eds) Mountains, Mobilities and Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58634-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58635-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)