Skip to main content

How Can One Be a ‘Montagnard’? Social and Political Expressions of Modern Imaginaries of Territoriality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The historical variations in the definition of the notion of culture, along with the variations of so-called cultural geography are well known; these have led to the disapproval of naturalistic and ecological perspectives, and to a greater consideration of intersubjectivity and of political and social processes in the construction of identity. But this renewal of academic paradigms should not blind us to the fact that many of them sprung from contemporary societies as imaginary figures, enabling social and geographical forms to take place. In looking through identity and territorial tensions in mountain regions in the world, this chapter aims to show the presence and role of those imaginary figures in contemporary societies.

This paper is an almost complete translation of a paper published in Annales de Géographie, 2008, 660–661, 90–115, called “Construits identitaires et imaginaires de la territorialité: variations autour de la figure du « montagnard »”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In French, montagnards has been the main word used for designating individuals living in mountain regions for centuries, both among scientists and in ordinary language. The same word has been common for pointing at mountain climbers since the mid-nineteenth century. It is only from the mid-twentieth century that it has become common to talk about populations de montagne. In English, ‘mountaineer’ was equivalent to ‘montagnards’ until the mid-nineteenth century; then, the word became reserved for climbers and sportsmen, individuals living in the so-called mountain regions being mostly named ‘mountain populations’ or ‘mountain people’. Some regional appellations have been adopted such as hillbilly in the Appalachian mountains and highlander in Scotland, both loaded with many connotations which will be commented later in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    See for example David Barkin and Michèle Dominy, 2001, ‘Mountain lands: regions of refuge or ecosystems for humanity?’ in B. Debarbieux and F. Gillet, op. cit., pp. 71–77.

Bibliography

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P., & Dasmann, R. (1978). Reinhabiting California. In P. Berg (Ed.), Reinhabiting a separate country: A bioregional anthology of Northern California (pp. 217–220). San Francisco: Planet Drum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbaum, E. (1998). Sacred mountains of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert, C. (1993). Buffon and the natural history of man: Writing history and the ‘foundational myth’ of anthropology. History of the Human Sciences, 6(1), 13–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, C. (2001). Ecocentric identity and transformation politics. International Journal of Peace Studies, 6. http://www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol6_2/Bretherton.htm

  • Broc, N. (1974). La géographie des philosophes: géographes et voyageurs français au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Éditions Ophrys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broc, N. (1991). Les montagnes au siècle des Lumières. Paris: CTHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. A. (1998). The mountain forum. Unasylva, 49(195), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Célérier, J. (1938). La montagne au Maroc, essai de définition et de classification. Hesperis, XXV, 109–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. W. (1953). The Victorian mountaineers. London: BT Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognat, B. (1973). La Montagne colonisée. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B. (2008). Construits identitaires et imaginaires de la territorialité: variations autour de la figure du ‘montagnard’. Annales de géographie, 660–661, 90–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B., & Gillet, F. (Eds.). (2000). Mountain regions: A research subject? Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B., & Price, M. (2008). Representing mountains: From local and national to global common good. Geopolitics, 13(1), 148–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2008). Linking mountain identities throughout the world: The experience of Swiss municipalities. Cultural Geography, 15(4), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2015). The mountain: A political history from the enlightenment to the present. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.-L., Santelli, R., & George-Warren, H. (2004). The Appalachians: America’s first and last frontier. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funnell, D., & Parish, R. (2001). Mountain environments and communities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon. (1778). Supplément à l’ Histoire naturelle, tome IV. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, J.-P. (1984). L’Aménagement de la montagne en France: politique, discours et production d’espaces dans les Alpes du Nord. Gap: Ophrys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives, J. (2002). Along a steep pathway. Our Planet, UNEP Magazine, 131, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapos, V., et al. (2000). Developing a map of the world’s mountain forests. In M. Price & N. Butt (Eds.), Forests in sustainable mountain development: A state-of knowledge report for 2000. Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, G. L. comte de Buffon. (1749). Histoire naturelle générale et particulière, tome III. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, D. (1988). Les alpinistes en France: 1875–1919. Etude d’histoire sociale, étude de mentalité. Paris: CTHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. M., Johnston, L., & Askins, D. (1978). Colonialism in modern America: The Appalachian case. Boone: Appalachian Consortium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. V. (Ed.). (1999). Bioregionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, B., & Bernbaum, E. (2004). The role of culture, education, and science for sustainable mountain development. In M. F. Price, L. Jansky, & A. Iatsenia (Eds.), Key issues for mountain areas. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerli, B., & Ives, J. (Eds.). (1997). Mountains of the world: A global priority. London: Parthenon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2001). La ‘montagne’ comme objet de savoir co-construit dans le débat scientifique. Revue de Géographie Alpine, 89(2), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero, G. (2004). Global economy, local politics: Indigenous struggles, civil society and democracy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., Jansky, L., & Iatsenia, A. (2004a). Key issues for mountain areas. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., Lysenko, I., & Gloersen, E. (2004b). Delineating Europe’s mountains. Revue de Géographie Alpine/Journal of Alpine Studies, 2, 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, P. S., Saxena, K. G., & Rao, K. S. (2006). Shifting agriculture and sustainable development of North-Eastern India: Tradition in transition. New Delhi/Oxford: UNESCO and IBH Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remy, P. (2001). Un lobby territorial et l’expertise scientifique. In B. Debarbieux & P.-A. Landel (Eds.), La montagne entre science et politique. Grenoble: Dossiers de la Revue de Géographie Alpine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudaz, G., & Debarbieux, B. (2013). La montagne suisse: un objet politique incertain. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, K. (1985). Dwellers in the land: The bioregional vision. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, F., Romero, H., & Messerli, B. (1999). The Andean Mountain Association, the International Geographical Union, and Alexander Von Humboldt on Mount Chimborazo. International Geographical Union Bulletin, 49(2), 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. (Ed.). (1992). The state of the world’s mountains. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tissot, L. (2004). Du touriste au guide de montagne: la question de l’identité Alpine (1850–1920). In D. Grange (Ed.), L’espace alpin et la modernité. Bilans et perspectives au tournant du siècle. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor-Roper, H. (1983). The highland tradition of Scotland. In E. Hobsbawn & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, F. (2004). Les figures paysagères de la nation. Paris: EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisnant, D. E. (1980). Modernizing the mountaineer. New York: Burt Franklin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whymper, E. (1900). Scrambles amongst the Alps in the years 1860–69. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, O. (1998). In search of natural identity: Alpine landscape and the reconstruction of the Swiss nation. Comparative Studies of Society and History, 40, 637–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Debarbieux, B. (2018). How Can One Be a ‘Montagnard’? Social and Political Expressions of Modern Imaginaries of Territoriality. In: Kakalis, C., Goetsch, E. (eds) Mountains, Mobilities and Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58635-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics