Abstract
Drawing from 55 in-depth interviews with residents of the new-build neighborhoods of Courbevoie and Levallois-Perret (Hauts-de-Seine) carried out in 2004-2008, Bruno Cousin analyze their sense of spatial justice, as well as the arrangements and compromises they display when their residential choices and their attitude towards local integration are challenged. By focusing on a segment of the upper-middle class that chose to live in new, remarkably socially homogeneous neighborhoods this chapter offers an unprecedented insight into the justifications, attempted justifications, and refusals to justify themselves of a population playing an active role in the upkeep and increase of urban segregation. It also shows that the distinction between classical liberalism and neoliberalism is crucial when analyzing precisely the subjective meaning-making and the sense of justice of the denizens of contemporary cities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I would like to thank Luc Boltanski, Edmond Préteceille, Marco Oberti, Enzo Mingione, Arnaldo Bagnasco, Anne Raulin, Sébastien Chauvin, Tommaso Vitale, Michèle Lamont, Nicolas Duvoux, Jacques Rodriguez and Gülçin Erdi for their advice or comments on previous versions of this chapter.
- 2.
The refoundation process and the areas I call in this chapter refounded neighbourhoods correspond to what is sometimes referred to as ‘new-build gentrification’ (Davidson and Lees 2005, 2010; Butler 2007). But because, like other scholars, I am averse to the indiscriminate use of the term ‘gentrification’ to indicate all forms of local social upgrading, I prefer ‘refoundation’. On the differences between traditional bourgeois neighbourhoods, refounded neighbourhoods and gradually gentrified neighbourhoods, see also B. Cousin and Serge Paugam (2014). In addition, on refounded neighbourhoods in Milan (Italy) see B. Cousin and Edmond Préteceille (2008) and B. Cousin (2012, 2014a, 2016b).
- 3.
According to the socio-spatial typology and the detailed description of Paris’ urban mosaic elaborated by Edmond Préteceille (2003) using 1999 census data, the area I studied in Levallois was part of type SBE (espaces de la bourgeoisie à prédominance de chefs et cadres d’entreprise), while the two I studied in Courbevoie were classified as type SCE (espaces des cadres d’entreprise et ingénieurs, chefs d’entreprise et professions intermédiaires des entreprises). Among the 18 types identified by Préteceille, SBE was the second most socially selective, with an average of 46.1% of managers and professionals within its economically active population, while SCE was the fourth with an average of 33.5%. SCE, however, was the type the most distinctly characterised by an overrepresentation of private sector executives.
- 4.
Of course, questions also avoided using value-laden words such as ‘discrimination ’, ‘segregation’ or ‘diversity’. On the relation between any discourse that is not strictly private with a critical space, which by definition demands justifications , see Jürgen Habermas (1985 [1981]).
- 5.
On the different regimes of action (including the regime of justification), see Luc Boltanski (2012).
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
For an introduction to analytic political philosophy, see, for instance, Will Kymlicka (2001).
- 9.
Conversely, none of the Levallois respondents saw the ubiquity of CCTV in their municipality as a problem. They all considered that since they had ‘done no wrong’, surveillance was not an issue.
- 10.
With many apartment block buildings of 12 or 13 floors, the Faubourg de l’Arche has 15,000 residents (around 13,000 at the start of my research) spread over 38 hectares: a population density almost twice that of the Paris average within the périphérique ring road.
- 11.
The linear relation between the forms of the public spaces and their respective (and intended) functions, which prevents their conversion to another purpose, as well as the sequential organisation of daily time shared by most residents (Cousin, 2013) mean that public facilities are used by most people at the same time, exacerbating the feeling of overcrowding and shortage. On linearity and sequentiality, see Richard Sennett (1990).
- 12.
On the concept of negative liberty, see Isaiah Berlin (2002).
- 13.
On the criminalisation of the poor as a central element of neoliberalism , see, for instance, Loïc Wacquant (2009).
References
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Community. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Elijah. 2011. The Cosmopolitan Canopy: Race and Civility in Everyday Life. New York: Norton & Company.
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Liberty, 166–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boltanski, Luc. 2008. Rendre la réalité inacceptable. Paris: Demopolis.
———. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation (1st French edition: 2009). Cambridge: Polity.
———. 2012. Love and Justice as Competences (1st French edition: 1990). Cambridge: Polity.
———. 2014. Croissance des inégalités, effacement des classes sociales? In Inégalités et justice sociale, ed. François Dubet, 25–47. Paris: La Découverte.
Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism (1st French edition: 1999). London: Verso.
Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth (1st French edition: 1991). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1st French edition: 1979). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. John G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.
Brenner, Neil, Peter Marcuse, and Margit Mayer, eds. 2012. Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. Abingdon: Routledge.
Butler, Tim. 2007. Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (4): 759–781.
Castel, Robert. 2003. L’insécurité sociale. Qu’est-ce qu’être protégé? Paris: Seuil.
Collins, Randall. 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
Cousin, Bruno. 2012. Classes supérieures de promotion et entre-soi résidentiel: l’agrégation affinitaire dans les quartiers refondés de Milan’. Espaces et Sociétés 150: 85–105.
———. 2013. Ségrégation résidentielle et quartiers refondés. Usages de la comparaison entre Paris et Milan. Sociologie du travail 55 (2): 214–236.
———. 2014a. Refonder Milan: Silvio Berlusconi et la promotion de nouveaux quartiers pour les classes supérieures. Questions de communication 25: 41–60.
———. 2014b. Entre-soi mais chacun chez soi. L’agrégation affinitaire des cadres parisiens dans les espaces refondés. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 204: 88–101.
———. 2016a. Les habitants des quartiers refondés face à l’injustice spatiale. Refuser, ménager et détourner la critique. Communications 98: 81–94.
———. 2016b. Ségrégation discriminante et rapport à l’injustice spatiale dans les quartiers supérieurs refondés de Milan. Méditerranée 127.
Cousin, Bruno, and Sébastien Chauvin. 2015. Vers une hyper-bourgeoisie globalisée? In Un monde d’inégalités. L’état du monde 2016, ed. Bertrand Badie and Dominique Vidal, 148–154. Paris: La Découverte.
Cousin, Bruno, and Serge Paugam. 2014. Liens locaux et déclinaisons de l’entre-soi dans les quartiers de classes supérieures. In L’intégration inégale. Force, fragilité et rupture des liens sociaux, ed. Serge Paugam, 155–171. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Cousin, Bruno, and Edmond Préteceille. 2008. La division sociale de l’espace milanais. Comparaison avec le cas parisien. Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome – Italie et Méditerranée 120 (1): 315–333.
Davidson, Mark, and Loretta Lees. 2005. New-Build ‘Gentrification’ and London’s Riverside Renaissance. Environment and Planning A 37 (7): 1165–1190.
———. 2010. New-Build Gentrification: Its Histories, Trajectories and Critical Geographies. Population, Space and Place 16 (5): 395–411.
Dubet, François. 1994. Sociologie de l’expérience. Paris: Seuil.
——— (with Valérie Caillet, Régis Cortéséro, David Mélo, and Françoise Rault). 2006. Injustices. L’expérience des inégalités au travail. Seuil: Paris.
———. 2007. L’expérience sociologique. Paris: La Découverte.
———. 2010. Les places et les chances. Repenser la justice sociale. Paris: Seuil.
Fainstein, Susan. 2011. The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
———. 2013. Justice spatiale et aménagement urbain. In Justice spatiale et politiques territoriales, ed. Frédéric Dufaux and Pascale Philifert, 249–288. Nanterre: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.
Genestier, Philippe. 2010. La mixité: mot d’ordre, vœu pieux ou simple argument? Espaces et Sociétés 140–141: 21–35.
Goblot, Edmond. 2010. La barrière et le niveau. Étude sociologique sur la bourgeoisie française moderne (1st edition: 1925). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. London: Harper & Row.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action (1st German edition: 1981). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hall, Peter A., and Michèle Lamont. 2013. Introduction. In Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era, ed. P.A. Hall and M. Lamont, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, David. 2001. Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. New York: Routledge.
———. 2009. Social Justice and the City (revised edition) (1st edition: 1973). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
———. 2012. Rebel Cities. From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jerolmack, Colin, and Shamus Khan. 2014. Talk Is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research 43 (2): 178–209.
Khan, Shamus. 2012. The Sociology of Elites. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 361–377.
Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals, & Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.
Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing. Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171.
Le Galès, Patrick. 2016. Neoliberalism and Urban Change: Stretching a Good Idea Too Far? Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (2): 154–172.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1968. Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
———. 1991. The Production of Space (1st French edition: 1974). Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 2003. The Urban Revolution (1st French edition: 1970). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lofland, Lyn H. 1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Marcuse, Peter, James Connolly, Johannes Novy, Ingrid Olivo, Cuz Potter, and Justin Steil, eds. 2009. Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton. 1988. The Dimensions of Residential Segregation. Social Forces 67 (2): 281–315.
Oberti, Marco. 2007. L’école dans la ville. Ségrégation – mixité – carte scolaire. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Paugam, Serge, Bruno Cousin, Camila Giorgetti, and Jules Naudet. 2017. How Do the Rich See the Urban Poor? Investigating the Meaning of Inequality in Paris, Delhi and São Paulo. In Comparative Urban Studies, ed. Hilary Silver. Abingdon: Routledge.
Pinçon, Michel, and Monique Pinçon-Charlot. 1989. Dans les beaux quartiers. Paris: Seuil.
———. 2007. Les ghettos du Gotha. Comment la bourgeoisie défend ses espaces. Paris: Seuil.
Préteceille, Edmond. 2003. La division sociale de l’espace francilien. Typologie socioprofessionnelle 1999 et transformations de l’espace résidentiel 1990–1999. Paris: Observatoire Sociologique du Changement.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2013. The Society of Equals (1st French edition: 2011). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sennett, Richard. 1990. The Conscience of the Eye: The Design and Social Life of Cities. New York: Knopf.
Soja, Edward. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 2014. Seeking Spatial Justice in Los Angeles. In My Los Angeles, 219–246. Oakland: University of California Press.
Storper, Michael. 2016. The Neo-Liberal City as Idea and Reality. Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (2): 241–263.
Taboada Leonetti, Isabel (with Michèle Guillon). 1987. Les immigrés des beaux quartiers. La communauté espagnole dans le XVI e. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cousin, B. (2017). Refounded Neighbourhoods and Spatial Justice: The Inhabitants’ Attitudes Towards Urban Segregation. In: Erdi, G., Şentürk, Y. (eds) Identity, Justice and Resistance in the Neoliberal City. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58632-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58632-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58631-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58632-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)