Skip to main content

Use of Focus Groups in Developing Behavioural mHealth Interventions: A Critical Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Era in Focus Group Research

Abstract

The benefit of incorporating and embedding qualitative work in the development of complex interventions is now widely accepted. The MRC framework, for example, states that focus groups can be useful: in ‘defining the components of the intervention’ and in ‘defining the trial and intervention design’. In the case of ‘m-health’ interventions (behavioural interventions that incorporate the use of mobile technologies), this can include formative testing, pre-testing and piloting, through to implementation and evaluation. Despite this recognition, we question whether focus groups and data are being used to full advantage. Working chronologically through the stages of intervention development, we draw on relevant literature and our own experience, our main case study is the PROPELS trial (an mhealth project for people with pre-diabetes). We discuss how we used focus groups to develop an m-health support and maintenance arm, incorporating the use of tailored text messages and telephone support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbour, R. (2007) Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S. et al. (2008) ‘Medical Research Council Guidance. “Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance”’. British Medical Journal, 37: a1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, A., and De Vries, H. (1999) ‘The development of computer-generated tailored interventions’. Patient Education and Counseling, 36(2): 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, C. (with Das, R.) (1999) ‘Are focus groups suitable for “sensitive” topics?’, In R.S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 47–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldsoe, B.S., Miller, Y.D., O’Brien, J.L. et al. (2012) ‘Iterative development of MobileMums: A physical activity intervention for women with young children’. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9: 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonteyn, M., Kuipers, B., and Grobe, S.A. (1993) ‘Description of Think Aloud Method and Protocol Analysis’. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4): 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gócza, Z., and Kollin, Z. (2015) ‘UX Myths’: http://uxmyths.com/post/1319999199/myth-26-usability-testing-focus-groups.

  • Hevner, A.R. (2007) ‘A three cycle view of design science research’. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2): 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J., and Farquhar, C. (1999) ‘The analytical potential of “sensitive moments” in focus group discussions’, In R. Barbour and J. Kitzinger (eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 156–172.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M. et al. (2013) ‘The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions’. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., Audrey S., Barker, M. et al. (2014) Process Evaluation of Complex Interventions: Medical Research CouncilGguidance. London: MRC Population Health Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.L. (1988) The Focus Group Guidebook (Focus Group Kit, Book 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, K., Sutton, S., Hardeman, W. et al. (2015) ‘A text-messaging and pedometer program to promote physical activity in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes: A development and feasibility study for the PROPELS Trial’. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(4): e105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaeffli, L., Maddison, R., Whittaker, R. et al. (2012) ‘A mHealth cardiac rehabilitation exercise intervention: Findings from content development studies’. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 12: 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnall, R., Bakken, S., Rojas, M., Travers, J., and Carballo-Dieguez, A. (2015) ‘mHealth technology as a persuasive tool for treatment, care and management of persons living with HIV’. AIDS and Behavior, 19: 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnall, R., Rojas, M., Bakken, S. et al. (2016) ‘A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)’. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 60: 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C., Vannak U., Sokhey L. et al. (2016) ‘Mobile technology for improved family planning (MOTIF): The development of a mobile phone-based (mHealth) intervention to support post-abortion family planning (PAFP) in Cambodia’. Reproductive Health, 13: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mierlo, T., Fournier, R., Jean-Charles, A. et al. (2014) ‘I’ll txt u if i have a problem: How the Société Canadienne du Cancer in Quebec applied behavior-change theory, data mining and agile software development to help young adults quit smoking’. PLoS ONE, 9: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterlander, W., Whittaker, R., McRobbie, H. et al. (2014) ‘Development of an evidence-based mhealth weight management program using a formative research process’. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R., Merry, S., Dorey, E. et al. (2012) ‘A development and evaluation process for mhealth interventions: Examples from New Zealand’. Journal of Health Communication, 17(Suppl. 1): 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2011) ‘mHealth: New Horizons for Health through Mobile Technologies’, Second Global Survey on eHealth Global Observatory for eHealth Series. 3. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley, L., Morrison, L., Bradbury, K. et al. (2015) ‘The person-based approach to intervention development: Application to digital health-related behavior change interventions’. JMIR, 17(1): e30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T., Griffin, S, Bodicoat, D.H. et al. (2015) ‘PRomotion Of Physical activity through structured Education with differing Levels of ongoing Support for people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (PROPELS): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial’. Trials, 16: 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Eborall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eborall, H., Morton, K. (2017). Use of Focus Groups in Developing Behavioural mHealth Interventions: A Critical Review. In: Barbour, R., Morgan, D. (eds) A New Era in Focus Group Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58613-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58614-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics