Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Best Practices for Synchronous Online Focus Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A New Era in Focus Group Research

Abstract

With continuous technological improvements, online data collection has become an expanding and valuable field in social sciences. Online focus groups are now increasingly used to complement or even replace face-to-face research interactions with technologically mediated ones. When referring to online focus group, we aim for a computer mediated ‘communication event’ (Terrance et al., Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 1993: 53) that is similar to an offline group, by attempting to mimic a face-to-face interaction format online. The main characteristic of online focus group, although many other aspects are very similar or equal to face-to-face groups, is the online venue which calls for different skills from the researcher and participants. Both are expected to have at least some level of computer literacy (Lobe 2008). When conducting online focus groups, there are some conceptual, practical and technological issues to be considered. In this chapter, I first present the temporal structure and the forms of synchronous online focus groups. Then, I consider the issues in Computer Medicated Communication (CMC) interaction as the salient feature of successful online focus groups. Following, I discuss several conceptual, practical and technological concerns, including: recruitment issues, research design issues, moderating issues and ethical issues. The chapter draws on knowledge and insights gathered via three sets of online focus groups that I have conducted personally or have been actively involved as a mentor: a set of more than 50 synchronous focus groups conducted via online messaging tools; a set of 10 audio focus groups conducted via the Skype application; and, a set of 15 video focus groups, conducted via the ZOOM conferencing tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, K. M., Wang, Z., Song, Y. J., & Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2015) ‘Data Richness Trade-Offs between Face-to-Face, Online Audivisual and Online Text Only Focus Groups’. Social Science computer review, 33(1): 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., & Hinton, S. M. (1999) ‘Realtime interviewing using the world wide web’. Sociological Research Online, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html 4/3 (accessed15 January 2006): 21.

  • Christians, C. G., & Chen, S. S.-L. (2004) ‘Introduction: Technological environments and the evolution of social research methods’, In M. D. Johns, S. S.-L Chen & G.J. Hall (eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics. New York/Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1909) Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind. New York, NY: Scribner’s.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R. (1997) ‘Using the internet for survey research’. Sociological Research Online, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2.

  • Ess, C. (2004) ‘Epilogue: Are we there yet? Emerging ethical guidelines for online research’, In M. D. Johns, S. S.-L Chen & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics. New York/Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C., & Committe, A. E. W. (2002) Ethical Decision Making and Internet Research. Association of Internet Researchers. Available at: http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.

  • Hine, C. (2005) ‘Virtual methods and the sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific knowledge’, In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual Methods. Oxford: Berg, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (ed.) (2005a) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, D. (1999) ‘Doing research in cyberspace’. Field Methods, 11(2): 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, N. W. (1999) ‘In search of methodological innovation in new media research’. The European Journal of Communication Research, 24(3): 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001) ‘Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31: 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2003) Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behaviour: Virtual Worlds, Real Lives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. N. (2005) ‘Internet behaviour and the design of virtual methods’, In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. (2005). ‘Interaction in cyberspace: An online focus group’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4): 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986) ‘Response effects in the electronic survey’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3): 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., Siegal, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) ‘Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication’. American Psychologist, 39: 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. M. (1998) ‘Towards geographies of cyberspace’. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3): 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobe, B. (2008). Integration of online research methods. Information technology/social/informatics collection. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Nagao, D. H. (1989) ‘Some effects of computerized interviewing on job application responses’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2010) ‘Focus groups and social interaction’, In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti & K. D. McKinney (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage Publications, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2012) ‘Focus groups and social interaction’, In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L., & Lobe, B. (2011) ‘Online focus groups’, In S. N. Hesse-Biber (ed.), The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwanga, J. R., Mugasche, C. L., Magnussen, P., Gabone, R.M., & Aagaard-Hansen, J. (1998) ‘Perls, Pith and Provocation: Experiences from Video-Recorded Focus Group Discussions on Schistosomiases in Magu, Tanzania’. Qualitative Health Research, 8(5): 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D. T., & Alexander, J. (1996) ‘The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of polity’, In R. Shields (ed.), Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies. London: Sage, pp. 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner, H., & Madge, C. (2003) ‘“Focus groups in cyberspace”: Using the Internet for qualitative research’. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6(2): 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oringderff, J. (2004) ‘“My Way”: Piloting an online focus group’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(3). Article 5. Retrieved 17/07/2016 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_3/html/oringderff.html.

  • Short, S. E. (2006) ‘Focus group interviews’, In E. Perecman & S. R. Curran (eds.), A Handbook for Social Science Field Research: Essays & Bibliographic Sources on Research Design and Methods. London: Sage, pp. 103–115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (2002) ‘Social relationships and identity online and offline’, In L. A. Lievrouw & S. M. Livingstone (eds.), Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London: Sage, pp. 533–546.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. S. (1986) ‘Using electronic email for data collection in organizational research’. Academy of Management Review, 74: 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. (1986) ‘Reducing social context clues: Electronic mail in organizational communications’. Management Science, 32(11): 1492–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005) ‘Researching online populations: The use of focus groups for social research’. Qualitative Research, 5(4): 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stover, C., & Goodman, L. (2012, August). ‘The use of online synchronous focus groups in a sample of lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students’. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrance, A. L., Johnson, G. M., & Walther, J. B. (1993) ‘Understanding the communication process in focus groups’, In D. L. Morgan (ed.), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2004) ‘Re-examining the ethics of internet research: Facing the challenge of overzealous oversight’, In M. D. Johns, S. S.-L. Chen & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online Social Research: Methods, Issues, & Ethics. New York/Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttas, C. A. (2015) ‘Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews’. Qualitative Health Research, 25(1): 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1995) ‘Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time’. Organizational Science, 6(2): 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1996) ‘Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction’. Communication Research, 23(1): 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002) ‘Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships’, In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage Publications, pp. 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. J. (1999) ‘The cyber-ethnographic (re)construction of two feminist online communities’. Sociological Research Online, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/1.

  • Williams, S., & Reid, M. (2012). ‘“It’s like there are two people in my head”: A phenomenological exploration of anorexia nervosa and its relationship to the self’. Psychology & Health, 27(7): 798–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ljubljana (UL), Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Bojana Lobe

Authors
  1. Bojana Lobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bojana Lobe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. WELS, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

    Rosaline S. Barbour

  2. Portland State University, Portland, USA

    David L. Morgan

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lobe, B. (2017). Best Practices for Synchronous Online Focus Groups. In: Barbour, R., Morgan, D. (eds) A New Era in Focus Group Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58613-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58614-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation