Skip to main content

What’s the Rush? Reacting to a Slow-Moving Disaster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Communicating Climate Change
  • 833 Accesses

Abstract

Even when people accept the existence and causes of climate change, there seems to be little collective will to address it. Human beings are a unique species and we have been successful in overcoming many serious problems confronting us, including some major environmental problems. However, not just political obstacles but important psychological and social barriers seem to have prevented major action on climate in the United States to date. It is difficult for people to accept that the Earth can actually change and become irreversibly less hospitable. Society is not a self-correcting system and powerful interests encourage “skeptical” thinking on the issue of climate. Both our social environment—the perceived “climate” of public opinion—and our changing media system influence our perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allgaier, J.2013. On the Shoulders of YouTube: Science in Music Videos. Science Communication 35(2): 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S., and G. Möser.2007. Twenty Years After Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-Analysis of Psycho-Social Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(1): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M.T., and J.M. Boykoff.2004. Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press. Global Environmental Change 14(2): 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. 2011. Storm Warnings: Extreme Weather is a Product of Climate Change. Scientific America, June 28. www.scientificamerican.com/article/extreme-weather-caused-by-climate-change/

  • Carson, R.1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A., and T.R. Peterson.2012. Climate Change Politics: Communication and Public Engagement. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, O.H.1982. Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, E. 2008. A First Look at Communication Theory. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill. Also available online at www.afirstlook.com/docs/spiral.pdf

  • Lorenzoni, I., S. Nicholson-Cole, and L. Whitmarsh.2007. Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change Among the U.K. Public and Their Policy Implications. Global Environmental Change 17: 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S., and S. Nicholson-Cole.2009. Fear Won’t Do It”: Promoting Positive Engagement with Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations. Science Communication 30(3): 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S., H. Bonfadelli, and M. Rusanen.2003. The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors. Risk Analysis 23(4): 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J., and M. Morgan. 1999. Television and Its Viewers: Cultivation Theory and Research. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, M. 2007. Talking About a Revolution: Climate Change and the Media. International Institute for Environment and Development, December. dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/6263/Talking%20about%20a%20revolution.pdf?sequence=1&is%20allowed=y

  • Taylor, K., S. Priest, H. Fussell, S. Banning, and K. Campbell.2009. Reading Hurricane Katrina: Information Sources and Decision-Making in Response to a Natural Disaster. Social Epistemology 23(3–4): 361–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., and L. Kahlor.2013. What, Me Worry? The Role of Affect in Information Seeking and Avoidance. Science Communication 35(2): 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Priest, S. (2016). What’s the Rush? Reacting to a Slow-Moving Disaster. In: Communicating Climate Change. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58579-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics