Advertisement

The Communication Challenge of Our Century

  • Susanna Priest
Chapter
  • 662 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication book series (PSMEC)

Abstract

This introductory chapter articulates the book’s emphasis on the role of communication and communication research in addressing climate change. Communicators (including scientists and science communication practitioners) and communication researchers seeking to identify research-based strategies and solutions for communicating climate are the audiences for this book. While public opinion continues to evolve, and U.S. public acceptance of the climate problem is trending up, major barriers remain. Because the problem requires a collective solution, Priest urges increased emphasis on understanding collective processes, alongside studies of the psychology of individuals. In science communication research, a dialogic approach and an emphasis on public engagement programs are replacing our old “deficit” assumptions. Despite tension between strategic and democratic goals in science communication, there is a path forward.

Keywords

Climate Change Public Opinion Opinion Leader Public Engagement Scientific Consensus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. 2012. The Theory of Planned Behavior. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, eds. P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, vol. 1, 438–459. Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Boykoff, M. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Coverage of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brulle, R. 2012. Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-Movement Organizations. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7 (December).Google Scholar
  4. Davison, W.1983. The Third Person Effect in Communiation. Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desjardins, L. 2015. What Does Ben Carson Believe? Where the Candidate Stands on 10 Issues. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/ben-carson-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
  6. Desjardins, L., and N. Boyd. 2015. What Does Donald Trump Believe? Where the Candidate Stands on 10 Issues. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/donald-trump-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
  7. Dewey, J. 1997. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Free Press. (First published 1916).Google Scholar
  8. Dunwoody, S.2005, Winter. Weight-of-Evidence Reporting: What Is It? Why Use It? Nieman Reports 59(4): 89–91 .http://niemanreports.org/articles/weight-of-evidence-reporting-what-is-it-why-use-it/
  9. Frumhoff, P. C., and N. Oreskes. 2015. Fossil Fuel Groups are Still Bankrolling Climate Denier Lobby Groups. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/25/fossil-fuel-firms-are-still-bankrolling-climate-denial-lobby-groups
  10. Gandy, O. 1982. Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Horlick-Jones, T., J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, and T. O’riordan.2006. On Evaluating the GM Nation: Public Debate About the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain. New Genetics and Society 25(3): 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe, P., M. Mildenberger, J. Marlon, and A. Leiserowitz.2015. Geographic Variation in Opinions on Climate Change at State and Local Scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change 5: 596–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iyengar, S., and D. Kinder. 1989. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. McCombs, M., and D. Shaw.1972. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. Rev. ed. W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Noelle-Neumann, E. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Our Social Skin. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pearson, A.R., and J.P. Schuldt.2015. Bridging Climate Communication Divides: Beyond the Partisan Gap. Science Communication 37(6): 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Priest, S. 2000. U.S. Public Opinion Divided Over Biotechnology? Nature Biotechnology 13: 939–942. (September).Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2013. Critical Science Literacy: What Citizens and Journalists Need to Know to Make Sense of Science. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 33(5–6): 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sturgis, P., and N. Allum.2004. Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Subramanian, C. 2013. Rebranding Climate Change as a Public Health Issue. Time, August 8. http://healthland.time.com/2013/08/08/rebranding-climate-change-as-a-public-health-issue/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanna Priest
    • 1
  1. 1.Camano IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations