Advertisement

Chóng ér fēi: Cultural Performances of Belonging in Intercountry Adoptive Families

  • Sarah Richards
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter scrutinises three ‘canonical’ narratives crucial to the discourse of adoption in general and intercountry adoption in particular, as they are revealed in the ‘performances’ of a group of adoptive families. These specific narratives focus on the primacy of the biological family, birth as a point where ethnicity and culture is fixed; and that the loss of each of these endangers a complete identity. Using performance theory, I illustrate the strategies employed by families who live in the UK and have adopted children from China to address the deficit of these origin narratives for their adopted children. This ethnography explores how these families construct familial and cultural belonging across ethnic, cultural, and biological boundaries. I argue that these families display and perform their belonging narratives whilst finding cultural strategies to connect their daughters to China and an absent biological family. By these means they conform to the expectations of the ‘good adoptive parent’.

References

  1. Allen, N. (2007). Making Sense of the New Adoption Law a Guide for Social and Welfare Services. Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Anagnost, A. (2000). Scenes of Misrecognition: Maternal Citizenship in the Age of Transnational Adoption. Positions, 8(2), 241–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barn, R. (2013). Doing the Right Thing: Transracial Adoption in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(8), 1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.770543
  4. Bartholet, E. (1999). Family Bonds: Adoption, Infertility and the New World of Child Production. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackmore, S. (2000, October). The Power of Memes. Scientific American, 283(4), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton, J. (2013). Researching White Mothers of Mixed-Parentage Children: The Significance of Investigating Whiteness. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(8), 1311–1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.752101
  7. Bruner, E. M. (1986). Experiences and Its Expressions. In V. M. Turner & E. M. Bruner (Eds.), The Anthropology of Experience (pp. 3–30). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (2004). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Caballero, C., Edwards, R., Goodyer, A., & Okitikpi, T. (2012). The Diversity and Complexity of the Everyday Lives of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Families: Implications for Adoption and Fostering Practice and Policy. Adoption & Fostering, 36(3–4), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carstens, C., & Julia, M. (2000). Ethnoracial Awareness in Intercountry Adoption: US Experiences. International Social Work, 43(1), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, V. J. (2004). Inauthentic, The Anxiety over Culture and Identity. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coffey, A. (1999). The Ethnographic Self Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, P. (1995). Yesterday’s Worlds, Tomorrow’s World: From Racialisation of Adoption to the Politics of Difference. In I. Gaber & J. Aldridge (Eds.), In the Best Interests of the Child: Culture Identity and Transracial Adoption (pp. 43–76). London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  15. Conquergood, D. (1992). Ethnography, Rhetoric, and Performance. Quarterly Journal on Speech, 78, 80–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive Ethnography, Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying Families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (2003). Governmentality. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984 (pp. 229–245). London: The New Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frank, A. W. (2010). Letting Stories Breathe a Socio-Narratology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frith, S. (1996). Music and Identity. In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 108–127). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Geertz, C. (1988). Works and Lives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gillis, J. R. (1996). A World of Their Own Making Myth, Ritual, and the Quest for Family Values. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  24. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greene, S., Kelly, R., Nixon, E., Kelly, G. Borska, Z., Murphy, S., et al. (2007). A Study of Intercountry Adoption Outcomes in Ireland Summary Report. Retrieved April 3, 2013, from http://www.tcd.ie/childrensresearchcentre/assets/pdf/Publications/Adoptionsummary.pdf
  26. Hague Conference on Private International Law. (1993). Retrieved April 26, 2013, from http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.status&cid=69
  27. Harman, V. (2013). Social Capital and the Informal Support Networks of Lone White Mothers of Mixed-Parentage Children. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(8), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.752100
  28. Hollingsworth, L. D. (1998). Promoting Same-Race Adoption for Children of Color. Social Work, 43(2), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hollingsworth, L. D. (2008). Does the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption Address the Protection of Adoptees’ Cultural Identity? And Should It? Social Work, 53, 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobson, H. (2008). Culture Keeping. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Li, T. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madden, R. (2010). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Marston, G. (2002). Critical Discourse Analysis and Policy-Orientated Housing Research. Housing Theory and Society, 19(2), 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian Governmentality: What Does It Offer Critical Social Policy Analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richards, S. (2012). What the Map Cuts up the Story Cuts Across: Narratives of Belonging in Intercountry Adoption. In J. Simmonds & A. Phoenix (Eds.), Multiculturalism, Identity and Family Placement, in Adoption & Fostering, 36 (3–4): 104–111.Google Scholar
  36. Richards, S. (2013). Stories of Paper and Blood: Narratives of Belonging in Families with Daughters Adopted from China. PhD diss., Institute of Education University College, London.Google Scholar
  37. Richards, S. (2014). HCIA Implementation and the Best Interests of the Child. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series, vol. 597, 1–18. International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University (ISS). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77407
  38. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  39. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  40. Santino, J. (2004). Performative Commemoratives, the Personal, and the Public: Spontaneous Shrines, Emergent Ritual. In H. Bial (Ed.), The Performance Studies Reader (pp. 125–133). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Schechner, R. (2006). Performance Studies an Introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Selwyn, J., & Wijedasa, D. (2008). ‘The Language of Matching’, Why Am I Waiting? 7 July 2008 LVSRC. London: British Association Adoption & Fostering Conference.Google Scholar
  43. Singer, M. (Ed.). (1959). Traditional India; Structure and Change (Vol. X). Philadelphia: American Folklore Society.Google Scholar
  44. Smolin, D. M. (2004). Intercountry Adoption as Child Trafficking. Valparaiso University Law Review, 39 (2): 281–325. Retrieved from http://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol39/iss2/1
  45. Sullivan, L. E. (1986). Sound and Senses: Toward a Hermeneutics of Performance. History of Religions, 26(1), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, D. (2004). Translating Performance. In H. Bial (Ed.), The Performance Studies Reader (pp. 381–386). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, K. A., & Tessler, R. C. (2007). Bicultural Socialization Among Adoptive Families: Where There Is a Will There Is a Way. Journal of Family Issues, 28(9), 1189–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07301115
  48. Turner, V. (1982). From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Turner, V. (1986). The Anthropology of Performance. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.Google Scholar
  50. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://www.unicef.org.uk/UNICEFs-Work/Our-mission/UN-Convention/
  51. Volkman, T. A. (2005). Embodying Chinese Culture Transnational Adoption in North America. In T. A. Volkman (Ed.), Cultures of Transnational Adoption (pp. 81–113). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet. Social Text, 29(4), 3–17.Google Scholar
  53. Yuval-Davis, N. (1994). Identity Politics and Women’s Ethnicity. In V. M. Moghadam (Ed.), Identity Politics and Women Cultural Reassertions and Feminisms in International Perspective (pp. 408–424). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  54. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Politics of Belonging Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Richards
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SuffolkIpswichUK

Personalised recommendations