Advertisement

Hate the Results? Blame the Methods: An Autoethnography of Contract Research

  • Will Thomas
  • Mirjam Southwell
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents an autoethnographic account of the experiences of the authors in preparing and presenting a piece of contract research. The work itself was commissioned by a local body engaged in the policy-formation process and the chapter offers a broad narrative recounting the experience of commissioning, conducting, and then presenting the research, with less than positive responses from the funders to the results shared. This autoethnographic account offers insight for researchers working on contract research projects: the authors’ conclusions are presented in the hope that they might help other researchers avoid similarly painful situations. The chapter also shows how the process of autoethnography can be used as part of a professional development or learning experience.

References

  1. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Black, N. (2001). Evidence Based Policy: Proceed with Care. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 323(7307), 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boncori, I., & Vine, T. (2014). ‘Learning Without Thought Is Labour Lost, Thought Without Learning Is Perilous’: The Importance of Pre-departure Training and Emotions Management for Expatriates Working in China. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 6(2), 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, S., Benita, S., Coates, E., Davies, P., & Penn, G. (2007). Analysis for Policy: Evidence-Based Policy in Practice. London: Government Social Research Unit.Google Scholar
  5. Cheek, J. (2011). The Politics and Practices of Funding Qualitative Inquiry (p. 251). London: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research.Google Scholar
  6. Clough, P. T. (1998). The End(s) of Ethnography: From Realism to Social Criticism. Newbury Park, CA: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.Google Scholar
  7. Delamont, S. (2007). Arguments Against Auto-ethnography. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical Appreciation of an Emerging Art. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(4), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, C. (1991). Sociological Introspection and Emotional Experience. Symbolic Interaction, 14(1), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 4, 273–290.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, C. S., & Bochner, A. P. (2006). Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esterling, B. A., L’abate, L., Murray, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Empirical Foundations for Writing in Prevention and Psychotherapy: Mental and Physical Health Outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt, N. (2001). Beyond Technical Reflection: Demonstrating the Modification of Teaching Behaviors Using Three Levels of Reflection. Avante-Ontario, 7(2), 66–76.Google Scholar
  14. Josselson, R. (1993). A Narrative Introduction. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The Narrative Study of Lives (Vol. 1, pp. xi–xv). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, R. (2003). Evidence and Policy: Interpreting the Delphic Oracle. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(9), 429–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Labuschagne, A. (2003). Qualitative Research-Airy Fairy or Fundamental? The Qualitative Report, 8(1), 100–103.Google Scholar
  17. Lomas, J. (2000). Connecting Research and Policy. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 1(1), 140–144.Google Scholar
  18. Miles, M. B. (1979). Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic Research: Design, Methodology, and Applications. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neal, S. (2010). Engaging in Effective Dialogues: How Can Qualitative Researchers, Policy Makers and Practitioners Talk Better to Each Other? Qualitative Research for Policy Making, Merlien Institute, 14–15 January.Google Scholar
  21. Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., Macintyre, S. J., Graham, H., & Egan, M. (2004). Evidence for Public Health Policy on Inequalities: 1 – The Reality According to Policymakers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(10), 811–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollitt, C. (2006). Academic Advice to Practitioners—What Is Its Nature, Place and Value Within Academia? Public Money and Management, 26(4), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  25. Rist, R. C. (1994). Influencing the Policy Process with Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 545–557). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Scott, D. (2002). Adding Meaning to Measurement: The Value of Qualitative Methods in Practice Research. The British Journal of Social Work, 32(7), 923–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Silverman, D. (2010). Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of Class & Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Sparkes, A. C. (1996). The Fatal Flaw: A Narrative of the Fragile Body-Self. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sparkes, A. C. (2000). Autoethnography and Narratives of Self: Reflections on Criteria in Action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stivers, C. (1993). Reflections on the Role of Personal Narrative in Social Science, Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18(2 Winter, 1993), 408–425.Google Scholar
  33. Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vicsek, L. (2010). Issues in the Analysis of Focus Groups: Generalisability, Quantifiability, Treatment of Context and Quotations. The Qualitative Report, 15(1), 122.Google Scholar
  35. Walker, D. (2007). Is Evidence for Policy Good for Democracy? Public Money and Management, 27(4), 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wall, S. (2006). An Autoethnography on Learning About Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wall, S. (2008). Easier Said Than Done: Writing an Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., & Prosser, J. (2012). Ethical Regulation and Visual Methods: Making Visual Research Impossible or Developing Good Practice? Sociological Research Online, 17(1), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Will Thomas
    • 1
  • Mirjam Southwell
    • 2
  1. 1.University of SuffolkIpswichUK
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherIpswichUK

Personalised recommendations