Prison Food in Denmark: Normal Responsibility or Ethnocentric Imaginations?

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

All Scandinavian countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) have incarceration rates below 71 per 100,000 inhabitants, with the notable exception of Greenland. These rates are significantly lower than most developed countries and scholars have associated this trend with the non-punitive ideals associated with the Nordic Welfare Model. Indeed, the Nordic Welfare Model has been historically characterized by social cohesion and a substantial reallocation of resources that perpetuates relatively small socio-economic differences between individuals (Kvist et al. 2012). In terms of criminal justice systems, these tenets suggest a system of corrections that is focused on rehabilitation and reintegration, not punishment (Pratt and Eriksson 2012; Pratt 2008).

References

  1. Barker, V. (2009). The politics of imprisonment: how the democratic process shapes the way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, V. (2012). Nordic exceptionalism revisited: explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime. Theoretical Criminology, 17(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, M., & Leonardsen, D. (2012). Inequality and punitivism in late modern societies. Scandinavian exceptionalism revisited. European Journal of Probation, 4(2), 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  6. Brisman, A. (2008). Fair fare?: Food as contested terrain in U.S prisons and jails. Georgetown. Journal on Poverty, Law & Policy, XV(1), 49–93.Google Scholar
  7. Danish Prison and Probation Service. (1993). Principprogrammet [The program of principles]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Prison and Probation Service.Google Scholar
  8. Danish Prison and Probation Service. (2015). Statistik [Statistics]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Prison and Probation Service.Google Scholar
  9. Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide. USA: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  10. Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen. (1993). [Danish Prison and Probation Service] Kriminalforsorgens princip program [The Principle programme]. København, Denmark.Google Scholar
  11. Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen. (2014). [Danish Prison and Probation Service]. Statistik [Statistics]. København, Denmark.Google Scholar
  12. Earle, R., & Phillips, C. (2012). Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food: Perspectives from a ‘prison ethnography.’ Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godderis, R. (2006). Dining in: the symbolic power of food in prison. The Howard Journal, 45(3), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Centre for Prison Studies. (2015). World prison brief. Denmark: International Centre for Prison Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Justitsministeriet [Ministry of Justice], Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen [Danish Prison and Probation Service], Koncernledelsessekretariatet [management services], Jura og statistik [Law and Statistics] (2015). Indsatte og klienters etniske baggrund [Inmates and clients’ ethnic background]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Direktoratet for Kriminalforsorgen.Google Scholar
  16. Kvist, J., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., Kangas, O. (2012). Changing social equality. The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Great Britain Policy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lindstad, J. (2015). Brugerundersøgelsen 2014 [User Survey 2014]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Prison and Probation Service.Google Scholar
  18. Mathiesen, T. (2012). Scandinavian exceptionalism in penal matters: reality or wishful thinking? In T. Ugelvik and J. Dullum (Eds.), Penal exceptionalism? Nordic prison policy and practice (pp. 13–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. McDonnell, M., Brookes, L., Lurigio, A. J. (2014). The promise of healthcare reform in transforming services for jail releases and other criminal justice populations. Health & Justice, 2(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Minke, K. L. (2014). Cooking in prison—from crook to cook. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 10(4), 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pratt, J. (2008). Scandinavian exceptionalism in an era of penal excess. Part I: the nature and roots of Scandinavian exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pratt, J., & Eriksson, A. (2012). In defence of Scandinavian exceptionalism. In T. Ugelvik and J. Dullum (Eds.), Penal exceptionalism? Nordic prison policy and practise (pp. 235–260). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ritzau. (2015). Pind vil sortere fanger i fængsler [Pind want to sort prisoners in prisons]. Information den 15 November 2015, p. 6.Google Scholar
  24. Scharff Smith, P., Horn, T., Nielsen, J. F., Rua, M. (2013). Isolation i Skandinaviske fængsler [Solitary Confinement in Scandinavian Prisons]. Tidsskriftet Social Kritik, 136, 4–20.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, C. (2002). Punishment and pleasure: women, food and the imprisoned body. Sociological Review, 50(2), pp. 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smoyer, A. B. (2014). Good and healthy. Foodways and construction of identity in a women’s prison. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53(5), 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smoyer, A. B. (2015). Making fatty girl cakes: food and resistance in a women’s prison. Prison Journal. doi:  10.1177/0032885515596520.
  28. Smoyer, A. B., & Minke, L. K (2015), Food systems in correctional settings—a literature review and a case study. World Health Organization. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/prisons-and-health/publications. Accessed 15 December 2015.
  29. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  30. Ugelvik, T. (2011). The hidden food: Mealtime resistance and identity work in a Norwegian Prison. Punishment & Society, 13(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valentine, G., & Longstaff, B. (1998). Doing porridge: food and social relations in a male prison. Journal of Material Culture, 3(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vanhouche, A. (2015). Acceptance or refusal of convenience food in present-day prison. Appetite, 94, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wacquant, L. (2008 [1999]). Fattigdommens fængsler [Les prisons de la misère]. København: Socialpolitisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  34. Wadel, C. (1991). Feltarbeid i egen kultur [Fieldwork within own Culture]. Seek A/S, Norge: Flekkfjord.Google Scholar
  35. Walmsley, R. (2014). World pre-trial/remand imprisonment list (2nd ed.). London: University of Essex, International Center for Prison Studies.Google Scholar
  36. International Centre for Prison Studies. http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All. Accessed 15 December 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Social WorkSouthern Connecticut State UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations