Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Working-through Collective Wounds

Part of the book series: Studies in the Psychosocial ((STIP))

  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

Soreanu offers an overview of the contributions of Ferenczi’s trauma theory to psychoanalysis, to social theory, and, ultimately, to a psychosocial understanding of the creativities of the collective. Soreanu arrives at a phenomenology of psychic splitting, where one can follow, in a collective frame, what different psychic fragments ‘do’, or what becomes of their social life. Soreanu also discusses a surprising form of social diagnostics centred on the confusion of tongues, or the confusion between the registers of the social. This leads to important conclusions about the intergenerational transmission of trauma and violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As Fassin and Rechtman argue, ‘trauma becomes something that testifies to the universality of suffering and to the equivalence of victims’ (Fassin and Rechtman 2009, p. 207).

  2. 2.

    For some crucial formulations on trauma theory see Bohleber (2007, 2010), Caruth (1995, 1996), Felman and Laub (1992), Fletcher (2013), LaCapra (2014), Laub (1992), Laub and Lee (2003), and Luckhurst (2013). For commentaries on trauma theory in the work of Ferenczi, see Avelar (2013), Bokanowski (2004, 2005), Bonomi (2003, 2004), Borgogno (2007), Frankel (1998), Haynal (1989, 2014), Schneider (1988, 1993), and Szekacs-Weisz and Keve (2012). For commentaries on Ferenczi’s ‘Orpha’ see Gurevich (2016), Koritar (2016), and Smith (1998, 1999).

References

  • Avelar, A. (2013). Trauma e prática clínica: um percurso entre Freud e Ferenczi. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Psicologia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohleber, W. (2007). Remembrance, trauma and collective memory: The battle for memory in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88(2), 329–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohleber, W. (2010). Destructiveness, intersubjectivity, and trauma: The identity crisis of modern psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokanowski, T. (2004). Splitting, fragmenting, and mental agony: The clinical thinking of Sándor Ferenczi. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 13(1–2), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokanowski, T. (2005). Variations on the concept of traumatism: Traumatism, traumatic, trauma. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86(2), 251–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, C. (2003). Between symbol and antisymbol: The meaning of trauma reconsidered. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 12(1), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, C. (2004). Trauma and the symbolic function of the mind. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 13(1–2), 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgogno, F. (2007). Ferenczi’s clinical and theoretical conception of trauma: A brief introductory map. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 67(2), 141–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caruth, C. (Ed.). (1995). Trauma: Explorations in memory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative and history. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D., & Rechtman, R. (2009). The empire of trauma: An inquiry into the condition of victimhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felman, S., & Laub, D. (Eds.). (1992). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1915a). The analysis of comparisons. Further contributions to the theory and technique of psycho-analysis (trans: Suttie, J. I., pp. 397–407). London: Karnac, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1930e). Fantasies on a biological model of super-ego formation. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (trans: Mosbacher, E., pp. 227–230). London: Karnac, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932e). The two extremes: Credulity and scepticism. Final contributions to the problems and methods of psycho-analysis (trans: Mosbacher, E., pp. 263–264). London: Karnac, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (2013). Freud and the scene of trauma. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (1998). Ferenczi’s trauma theory. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58(1), 41–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, H. (2016). Orpha, orphic functions, and the orphic analyst: Winnicott’s ‘regression to dependence’ in the language of Ferenczi. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76(4), 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. (1989). The concept of trauma and its present meaning. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 16, 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. (2014). Trauma-revisited: Ferenczi and modern psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34(2), 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koritar, E. (2016). Relaxation in technique leading to new beginnings. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76(4), 341–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaCapra, D. (2014). Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, D. (1992). Bearing witness or the vicissitudes of listening. In S. Felman & D. Laub (Eds.), Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history (pp. 57–74). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, D., & Lee, S. (2003). Thanatos and massive psychic trauma: The impact of the death instinct on knowing, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51(2), 433–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, R. (2013). The trauma question. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1988). Le trauma et la filiation paradoxale: de Freud à Ferenczi. Paris: Ramsay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1993). Trauma e filiação em Freud e Ferenczi. Revista percurso, 10(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. A. (1998). ‘Orpha reviving’: Toward an honorable recognition of Elizabeth Severn. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7(4), 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. A. (1999). From Oedipus to Orpha: Revisiting Ferenczi and Severn’s landmark case. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59(4), 345–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szekacs-Weisz, J., & Keve, T. (Eds.). (2012). Ferenczi for our time: Theory and practice. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soreanu, R. (2018). Conclusions. In: Working-through Collective Wounds. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58523-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics