Media, Politics and Penal Reform
This book has, for the first time, cast light on the particular difficulties experienced by those working to reform women’s penal policy. In so doing, it recognises the number of complexities inherent to the policy process, including the political culture and dominant ideology of the time (acting as an enabler or inhibitor to policy change); the ‘carrying capacities’ of the institutional agenda (Hilgartner and Bosk, 1988); the framing and (re)construction of competing messages and the omnipresent threat of public opinion.
- Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, E. (2007) ‘A new direction for penal politics? Putting the popular back into populism’. In R. Roberts and W. McMahon (Eds.) Social Justice and Criminal Justice. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
- Best, J. (2013) Social Problems. (Second Edition). New York: W.W Norton and Company.Google Scholar
- Gelsthorpe, L., and Loucks, N. (1997) ‘Magistrates’ Explanations of Sentencing Decisions’. In C. Hedderman and L. Gelsthorpe (Eds.) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. Home Office Research Study 170. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
- Grimshaw, R. (2004) ‘Whose Justice? Principal Drivers of Criminal Justice Policy, Their Implications for Stakeholders, and Some Foundations for Critical Policy Departures’ British Society of Criminology paper Available at: http://britsoccrim.org/volume7/005.pdf.
- Hedderman, C., and Barnes, R. (2015) ‘Sentencing Women: An Analysis of Recent Trends’. In J. Roberts (Ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hedge, J. (2007) Increasing the confidence of sentencers in community penalties: A programme of work with magistrates in the Thames Valley 2006/7. Available at: http://rethinking.org.uk/publications/index.shtml.
- Hobbs, S., and Hamerton, C. (2014) The Making of Criminal Justice Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Home Office (2001a) Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office (2001c) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework of England and Wales London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. by Baroness Jean Corston London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- House of Commons Justice Committee (2013) Women Offenders: After the Corston Report Second Report of Session 2013–14 HC 92 London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2002) ‘Strategies for Changing Public Attitudes to Punishment’. In J. Roberts and M. Hough (Eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
- Ipsos MORI. (2010) Where are the Public on Crime and Punishment? Available at: https://www.ipsos-mori.com/_emails/sri/latestthinking/aug2010/content/2_where-are-the-public-on-crime-punishment.pdf.
- Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (2005) News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Marougka, M. (2012) Sentencing women: Considering the factors that influence decision-making The Griffins Society Research Paper 2012/03.Google Scholar
- McCombs, M. E. (2014) Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Mills, H., and Roberts, R. (2012) ‘Reducing the Numbers in Custody: Looking Beyond Criminal Justice Solutions’ Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
- Minson, S. (2015) ‘Sentencing and dependents: Motherhood as mitigation’. In J. Roberts (Ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Moore, J. M., and Roberts, R. (2016) ‘What lies beyond criminal justice? Developing Transformative Solutions’. Justice, Power and Resistance Foundation Volume: 115–136.Google Scholar
- New Economics Foundation (2008) Unlocking Value: How We All Benefit from Investing in Alternatives to Prison for Women Offenders’ Available at: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/unlocking-value.
- Nimmo, D., and Combs, J. (1983) Mediated Political Realities. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Roberts, J. V. (2008) ‘Prisons and the Public’ Public Opinion and the Media Seminar: Commission on English Prisons Today Available at: http://www.howardleague.org/fileadmin/howard_league/user/pdf/Commission/Prisons_and_the_Public_-_Julian_Roberts.pdf.
- Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. J., Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rutherford, A. (1993) Criminal Justice and the Pursuit of Decency. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, M. (2010) ‘Policy making Processes, Mobilising Consent, and Contesting Penal Populism’ Speech to the 6th Annual North/South Criminology Conference, Belfast. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3425/1/RYAN_Policy_Making_Processes.pdf.
- Schlesinger, P., and Tumber, H. (1994) Reporting Crime: The Media Politics of Criminal. Justice Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Seal, L., and Phoenix, J. (2013) ‘Raw Deal: The Curious Expansion of Penal Control Over Women and Girls’. In A. Dockley and I. Loader (Eds.) The Penal Landscape: The Howard League Guide to Criminal Justice in England and Wales. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Snow, D. A., and Benford, R. D. (1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1 197–217.Google Scholar
- Zetter, L. (2008) Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Harriman House: Petersfield.Google Scholar