Advertisement

Media, Politics and Penal Reform

  • Gemma Birkett
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

This book has, for the first time, cast light on the particular difficulties experienced by those working to reform women’s penal policy. In so doing, it recognises the number of complexities inherent to the policy process, including the political culture and dominant ideology of the time (acting as an enabler or inhibitor to policy change); the ‘carrying capacities’ of the institutional agenda (Hilgartner and Bosk, 1988); the framing and (re)construction of competing messages and the omnipresent threat of public opinion.

Bibliography

  1. Altheide, D., and Coyle, M. (2006) ‘Smart on Crime: The New Language for Prisoner Release’. Crime, Media, Culture 2:3 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, E. (2007) ‘A new direction for penal politics? Putting the popular back into populism’. In R. Roberts and W. McMahon (Eds.) Social Justice and Criminal Justice. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Best, J. (2013) Social Problems. (Second Edition). New York: W.W Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  5. Birkett, G. (2016) ‘We have no awareness of what they actually do’ Magistrates Knowledge of and Confidence in Community Sentences for Women Offenders in England and Wales’. Criminology and Criminal Justice 16:4 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corcoran, M. (2011) ‘Dilemmas of Institutionalization in the Penal Voluntary Sector’. Critical Social Policy 31:1 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Easton, S., and Piper, C. (2012/2016) Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gelsthorpe, L. (2004) ‘Back to Basics in Crime Control: Weaving in Women’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7:2 76–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelsthorpe, L., and Loucks, N. (1997) ‘Magistrates’ Explanations of Sentencing Decisions’. In C. Hedderman and L. Gelsthorpe (Eds.) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. Home Office Research Study 170. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  10. Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  11. Green, D. (2009) ‘Feeding Wolves: Punitiveness and Culture’. European Journal of Criminology 6:6 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimshaw, R. (2004) ‘Whose Justice? Principal Drivers of Criminal Justice Policy, Their Implications for Stakeholders, and Some Foundations for Critical Policy Departures’ British Society of Criminology paper Available at: http://britsoccrim.org/volume7/005.pdf.
  13. Hallahan, K. (1999) ‘Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations’. Journal of Public Relations Research 11 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedderman, C., and Barnes, R. (2015) ‘Sentencing Women: An Analysis of Recent Trends’. In J. Roberts (Ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Hedge, J. (2007) Increasing the confidence of sentencers in community penalties: A programme of work with magistrates in the Thames Valley 2006/7. Available at: http://rethinking.org.uk/publications/index.shtml.
  16. Hilgartner, S., and Bosk., C. L. (1988) ‘The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model’. The American Journal of Sociology 94:1 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilton, M., McKay, J., Crowson, N., and Mouhout, J. (2013) The Politics of Expertise: How NGOs Shaped Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobbs, S., and Hamerton, C. (2014) The Making of Criminal Justice Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Home Office (2001a) Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  20. Home Office (2001c) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework of England and Wales London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  21. Home Office (2007) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System. by Baroness Jean Corston London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  22. House of Commons Justice Committee (2013) Women Offenders: After the Corston Report Second Report of Session 2013–14 HC 92 London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  23. Hudson, B. (1993) Penal Policy and Social Justice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter, G., and Radcliffe, P. (2013) ‘Are magistrates doing justice to women?’. Criminal Justice Matters 92:1 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutton, N. (2005) ‘Beyond Populist Punitiveness?’. Punishment and Society 7:3 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2002) ‘Strategies for Changing Public Attitudes to Punishment’. In J. Roberts and M. Hough (Eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  27. Ipsos MORI. (2010) Where are the Public on Crime and Punishment? Available at: https://www.ipsos-mori.com/_emails/sri/latestthinking/aug2010/content/2_where-are-the-public-on-crime-punishment.pdf.
  28. Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (2005) News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Kitzinger, J. (2000) ‘Media Templates: Patterns of Association and the (Re)construction of Meaning over Time’. Media, Culture and Society 22:1 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loader, I. (2010) ‘For Penal Moderation: Notes Towards a Public Philosophy of Punishment’. Theoretical Criminology 14:3 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marougka, M. (2012) Sentencing women: Considering the factors that influence decision-making The Griffins Society Research Paper 2012/03.Google Scholar
  32. McCombs, M. E. (2014) Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mills, H., and Roberts, R. (2011) ‘Is Penal Reform Working? Community Sentences and Reform Sector Strategies’. Criminal Justice Matters 84:1 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mills, H., and Roberts, R. (2012) ‘Reducing the Numbers in Custody: Looking Beyond Criminal Justice Solutions’ Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.Google Scholar
  35. Minson, S. (2015) ‘Sentencing and dependents: Motherhood as mitigation’. In J. Roberts (Ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, J. M., and Roberts, R. (2016) ‘What lies beyond criminal justice? Developing Transformative Solutions’. Justice, Power and Resistance Foundation Volume: 115–136.Google Scholar
  37. New Economics Foundation (2008) Unlocking Value: How We All Benefit from Investing in Alternatives to Prison for Women Offenders’ Available at: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/unlocking-value.
  38. Newburn, T., and Jones, T. (2005) ‘Symbolic politics and penal populism: the long shadow of Willie Horton’. Crime, Media, Culture 1:1 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nimmo, D., and Combs, J. (1983) Mediated Political Realities. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Player, E. (2014) ‘Women in the Criminal Justice System: The Triumph of Inertia’. Criminology and Criminal Justice 14:3 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Richardson, J. (2000) ‘Government, Interest Groups and Policy Change’. Political Studies 48 1006–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, J. V. (2008) ‘Prisons and the Public’ Public Opinion and the Media Seminar: Commission on English Prisons Today Available at: http://www.howardleague.org/fileadmin/howard_league/user/pdf/Commission/Prisons_and_the_Public_-_Julian_Roberts.pdf.
  44. Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. J., Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Russell, L. (2005) ‘Tabloid Tactics: Pushing Prison Reduction’. Criminal Justice Matters 59:1 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutherford, A. (1993) Criminal Justice and the Pursuit of Decency. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, M. (2010) ‘Policy making Processes, Mobilising Consent, and Contesting Penal Populism’ Speech to the 6th Annual North/South Criminology Conference, Belfast. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3425/1/RYAN_Policy_Making_Processes.pdf.
  48. Schlesinger, P., and Tumber, H. (1994) Reporting Crime: The Media Politics of Criminal. Justice Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Seal, L., and Phoenix, J. (2013) ‘Raw Deal: The Curious Expansion of Penal Control Over Women and Girls’. In A. Dockley and I. Loader (Eds.) The Penal Landscape: The Howard League Guide to Criminal Justice in England and Wales. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Snow, D. A., and Benford, R. D. (1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1 197–217.Google Scholar
  51. Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford Jr., E., Worden, S. K., and Benford, R. D. (1986) ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’. American Sociological Review 51:4 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solomon, E. (2005) ‘Is the Press the Real Power Behind Punitivism?’. Criminal Justice Matters 59:1 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terkildsen, N., and Schnell, F. (1997) ‘How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women’s Movement’. Political Research Quarterly 50: 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zetter, L. (2008) Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Harriman House: Petersfield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemma Birkett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyCity, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations