Advertisement

The Political Decision-Makers

  • Gemma Birkett
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

In discovering the full range of strategies employed by penal reform campaigners, revealing what goes on ‘behind closed doors’ is of crucial importance. Yet uncovering the truth in the British political system, which can be ‘broadly characterised as closed, elitist and secretive’ (Kavanagh et al., 2006: 425), is an extremely difficult task. Hogwood stated in 1987 that ‘we should not confuse the public prominence of political activities with the intensity of government concern…much of the most important discussion about shaping public policy in Britain takes place in private’ (1987: 1).

Bibliography

  1. Best, J. (2013) Social Problems. (Second Edition). New York: W.W Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  2. Carlen, P. (Ed.) (2002) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Willan: Cullompton, Devon.Google Scholar
  3. Dorey, P. (2005) Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grant, W. (1978) ‘Insider Groups, Outsider Groups and Interest Group Strategies in Britain’ University of Warwick Department of Politics Working Party no. 19.Google Scholar
  5. Hilgartner, S., and Bosk., C. L. (1988) ‘The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model’. The American Journal of Sociology 94:1 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hilton, M., McKay, J., Crowson, N., and Mouhout, J. (2013) The Politics of Expertise: How NGOs Shaped Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hogwood, B. (1987) From Crisis to Complacency: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. House of Commons Justice Committee (2013) Women Offenders: After the Corston Report Second Report of Session 2013–14 HC 92 London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  9. Ismaili, K. (2006) ‘Contextualising the Criminal Justice Policy-Making Process’. Criminal Justice Policy Review 17:3 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. John, P. (2012) Analyzing Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kavanagh, D., Richards, D., Smith, M. J., and Geddes, A. (2006) British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keefe, W. J., and Ogul, M. (1964) The American Legislative Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Kitzinger, J. (2000) ‘Media Templates: Patterns of Association and the (Re)construction of Meaning over Time’. Media, Culture and Society 22:1 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loader, I. (2006) ‘Fall of the “Platonic Guardians”: Liberalism, Criminology and Political Responses to Crime in England and Wales’. British Journal of Criminology 46: 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maloney, W., Jordan, G., and McLaughlin, A. (1994) ‘Interest Groups and Public Policy: The Insider/Outsider Model Revisited’. Journal of Public Policy 14:1 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsh, D., and Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992) ‘Policy Networks in British Politics’. In D. Marsh and R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.) Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCombs, M. E. (2014) Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nettle, J. P. (1965) ‘Consensus or Elite Domination: The Case of Business’. Political Studies 13:1 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rock, P. (1995) ‘The Opening Stages of Criminal Justice Policy-Making’. British Journal of Criminology 35 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schattschneider, E. E. (1935) Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Solesbury, W. (1976) ‘The Environmental Agenda’. Public Administration 54:4 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soroka, S., Lawlor, A., Farnsworth, S., and Young, L. (2012) ‘Mass Media and Policymaking’. In W. Xun, M. Ramesh, M. Howlett, S. Fritzen, and E. Araral (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Walgrave, S., and Van Aelst, P. (2006) ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory’. Journal of Communication 56:1 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whiteley, P., and Winyard, S. (1987) Pressure for the Poor: The Poverty Lobby and Policymaking. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Zetter, L. (2008) Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Harriman House: Petersfield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemma Birkett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyCity, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations