Advertisement

Penal Policy, Politics and Public Opinion

  • Gemma Birkett
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

This chapter considers the development of post-war penal policy in England and Wales through the lens of Rutherford’s penal paradigms. Drawing on Loader’s notion of the platonic guardians, it documents the changing nature of penal policymaking, from a private process involving elite experts to what we now recognise as ‘the culture of impatience’ (Loader, 2006). Demonstrating how the competing penal philosophies have enjoyed political favour at different junctures (from the post-war philosophy of rehabilitation to the punitive shift of the 1980s), it highlights the confused nature of the current penal position, framed – once again – in the language of reform. This refocus (manifested through the Transforming Rehabilitation agenda and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014) provides an example of the ‘new rehabilitation’ (Garland, 2001) and sits alongside the dominant punitive rhetoric espoused by

Bibliography

  1. Blom-Cooper, L. (1977) ‘The Role of Voluntary Organisations as Pressure Groups in Penal Reform’. In N. Walker (Ed.) Penal Policy-Making in England. (papers presented to the Copwood Round-Table Conference, December 1976). Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  2. Canovan, M. (1981) Populism. London: Junction Books.Google Scholar
  3. Castells, M. (2008) ‘The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavadino, M., and Dignan, J. (1992) The Penal System: An Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cavender, G. (2004) ‘Media and Crime Policy: A Reconsideration of David Garland’s The Culture of Control’. Punishment and Society 6:3 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chibnall, S. (1977) Law-and-Order-News. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  7. Critcher, C. (2002) ‘Media, Government and Moral Panic: The Politics of Paedophilia in Britain in 2000–1’. Journalism Studies 3:4 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cullen, F., Fisher, B. S., and Applegate, B. K. (2000) ‘Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections’. Crime and Justice 27: 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditton, J., and Duffy, J. (1983) ‘Bias in the Newspaper Reporting of Crime News’. British Journal of Criminology 23:2 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downes, D., and Morgan, R. (2007) ‘No Turning Back: The Politics of Law and Order into the Millennium’. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, and R. Reiner (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Fouth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Duffy, B., Wake, R., Burrows, T., and Bremner, P. (2008) Closing the Gaps: Crime and Public Perceptions. London: Ipsos MORI.Google Scholar
  12. Easton, S., and Piper, C. (2012/2016) Sentencing and Punishment: The Quest for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esmee Fairbairn Foundation (2004) Rethinking Crime and Punishment: The Report. London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Faulkner, D., and Burnett, R. (2012) Where Next for Criminal Justice? Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, I. (1994) ‘Containing the Crisis: Crime and the Tories’. International Socialism Journal 62: 51–70.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, C., and Albertson, K. (2011) ‘Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy?’. Criminology and Criminal Justice 11:5 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franklin, B., and Lavery, G. (1989) ‘Legislation by Tabloid’. Community Care 24 March: 26–28.Google Scholar
  18. Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garland, D. (1996) ‘The limits of the sovereign state strategies of crime control in contemporary society’. British Journal of Criminology 36:4 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garland, D. (1997) ‘Governmentality and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology’. Theoretical Criminology 1:2 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gelsthorpe, L. (2004) ‘Back to Basics in Crime Control: Weaving in Women’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7:2 76–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, W. (1978) ‘Insider Groups, Outsider Groups and Interest Group Strategies in Britain’ University of Warwick Department of Politics Working Party no. 19.Google Scholar
  24. Green, D. (2009) ‘Feeding Wolves: Punitiveness and Culture’. European Journal of Criminology 6:6 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., and Roberts, B. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobbs, S., and Hamerton, C. (2014) The Making of Criminal Justice Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Home Office (1990) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  28. Home Office (2001a) Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  29. Hood, C. (1991) ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’. Public Administration 69:1 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hough, M., and Roberts, J. (1999) ‘Sentencing Trends in Britain: Public Knowledge and Public Opinion’. Punishment and Society 1:1 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hough, M., Bradford, B., Jackson, J., and Roberts, J. (2013) Attitudes to Sentencing and Trust in Justice: Exploring Trends from the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Ministry of Justice Analytical Services London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  32. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (1998) Alternatives to Prison Sentences Third Report of Session 1997–98 London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  33. Hudson, B. (1993) Penal Policy and Social Justice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutton, N. (2005) ‘Beyond Populist Punitiveness?’. Punishment and Society 7:3 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2002) ‘Strategies for Changing Public Attitudes to Punishment’. In J. Roberts and M. Hough (Eds.) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  36. Ipsos MORI. (2010) Where are the Public on Crime and Punishment? Available at: https://www.ipsos-mori.com/_emails/sri/latestthinking/aug2010/content/2_where-are-the-public-on-crime-punishment.pdf.
  37. Jennings, W., Gray, E., Farrall, S., and Hay, C. (2015) ‘Penal Populism and the Public Thermostat: Crime, Public Punitiveness and Public Policy’ Paper for the P.S.A. Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Specialist Group annual conference, Cardiff. Available at: http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/epop2015/files/2016/02/Penal-Populism-and-the-Public-Thermostat-Crime-Public-Punitiveness-and-Public-Policy-Will-Jennings.pdf.
  38. Jewkes, Y. (2004) Media and Crime London: Sage to the revised 2015 edition of the book ‘Media & Crime’ (Jewkes, Y. (2015) Media and Crime London: Sage).Google Scholar
  39. Johnstone, G. (2000) ‘Penal Policy Making: Elitist, Populist or Participatory’. Punishment and Society 2:2 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lipton, D., Martison, R., and Wilks, J. (1975) Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survet of Treatment Evaluation Studies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  41. Loader, I. (2006) ‘Fall of the “Platonic Guardians”: Liberalism, Criminology and Political Responses to Crime in England and Wales’. British Journal of Criminology 46: 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loader, I. (2010) ‘For Penal Moderation: Notes Towards a Public Philosophy of Punishment’. Theoretical Criminology 14:3 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’. Public Interest 35:1 22–54.Google Scholar
  44. Mathiesen, T. (1995) ‘Driving forces behind prison growth: the mass media’ Conference Paper, International Conference on Prison Growth April 1995, Oslo. Available at: http://www.fecl.org/circular/4110.html.
  45. Mathiesen, T. (2000) Prison on Trial. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mathiesen, T. (2004) Silently Silenced: Essays on the Creation of Acquiescence in Modern Society. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  47. Matthews, R. (2005) ‘The Myth of Punitiveness?’. Theoretical Criminology 9:2 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ministry of Justice (2010) Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  49. Nimmo, D., and Combs, J. (1983) Mediated Political Realities. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  50. Pratt, J. (2007) Penal Populism. Routledge: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  51. Roberts, J. V. (2008) ‘Prisons and the Public’ Public Opinion and the Media Seminar: Commission on English Prisons Today Available at: http://www.howardleague.org/fileadmin/howard_league/user/pdf/Commission/Prisons_and_the_Public_-_Julian_Roberts.pdf.
  52. Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. J., Indermaur, D., and Hough, M. (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rutherford, A. (1993) Criminal Justice and the Pursuit of Decency. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ryan, M. (1978) The Acceptable Pressure Group: A Case Study of the Howard League and RAP Saxon House.Google Scholar
  55. Ryan, M. (1983) The Politics of Penal Reform. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  56. Ryan, M. (1999) ‘Penal Policy Making Towards the Millennium: Elites and Populists; New Labour and the New Criminology’. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 27 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ryan, M. (2003) Penal Populism and Political Culture. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ryan, M. (2005) ‘Engaging with punitive attitudes towards crime and punishment: Some strategic lessons from England and Wales’. In J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Wallsworth, and W. Morrison (Eds.) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan, M. (2008) ‘Does the Penal Lobby Matter Anymore?’. Criminal Justice Matters 72:1 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan, M. (2010) ‘Policy making Processes, Mobilising Consent, and Contesting Penal Populism’ Speech to the 6th Annual North/South Criminology Conference, Belfast. Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3425/1/RYAN_Policy_Making_Processes.pdf.
  61. Scull, A. (1984) Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant: A Radical View. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson, J. B. (2000) Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  63. Wood, J. L., and Viki, G. T. (2001) Public Attitudes to Crime and Punishment: A Review of the Research Report prepared for the Esmee Fairbairn Charitable Trust Available at: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/4591/1/Attitudes%20to%20Crime%20and%20Punishment%20Esmee%20Fairbairn%20-%20FV.pdf.
  64. Garland, D. (2002) The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemma Birkett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyCity, University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations