Skip to main content

A Human Capabilities Conceptualization of Graduate Employability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities, Employability and Human Development
  • 890 Accesses

Abstract

In the research project we were concerned with what was described as ‘inclusive development’ in the original proposal; as the project unfolded we sought to provide the idea with more conceptual grip. We also wanted to ask whether graduates obtaining employment was sufficient to make claims about higher education and development, whether opportunities were fair for all, and how we might understand interpersonal differences with regard to opportunities and outcomes. To do this, as we touched on in Chapter 1, we turned to human development (Haq 2003) and the capability approach in which development is understood as a process of expanding the real freedoms and genuine choices that people enjoy in order to lead a flourishing life (Sen 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My thanks to Merridy Wilson-Strydom for the basis from this vignette was developed.

  2. 2.

    My thanks to Talita Calitz for the vignette from which this story is extracted.

  3. 3.

    Based on theory and empirical data, Walker identified these ‘ideal’ multidimensional higher education capabilities: practical reason; educational resilience, knowledge and imagination; learning disposition; social relations and social networks; respect, dignity and recognition, emotional integrity and emotions and bodily integrity (2006, pp. 128–129).

References

  • Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques and related concepts. Human Development Research Paper 2010/01. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2009). The human development and capability approach. In S. Deneulin & S. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach (pp. 22–48). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boni, A., & Gasper, D. (2012). Rethinking the quality of universities: How can human development thinking contribute?. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boni, A., & Walker, M. (2016). Universities and global human development: Theoretical and empirical insights for social change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J. M., & Favarque, N. (2006). Promoting capability for work: The role of local actors. In S. Deneulin, N. Sagovsky, & M. Nebel (Eds.), Transforming unjust structures: The capability approach (pp. 121–142). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). The forms of capital. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), The Routledge Falmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighouse, H. (2006). On education. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. (2016). Culture, capitals and graduate futures. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calitz, M. L. (2016). An application of the capabilities approach to academic literacy at a South African university. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Bloemfontein, South Africa: University of the Free State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2009). Democracy and political participation. In S. Deneulin & L. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency (pp. xx–xx). London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2014). Wellbeing, justice and development ethics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Crespo, P. (2007). Education, employment and human development: Illustrations from Mexico. Journal of Education and Work, 20(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. (2015). How much will it cost to go to a South African university in 2016? Africa Check. https://africacheck.org/.../how-much-will-it-cost-to-go-to-a-south-african-university-in-2016/. Accessed 12 July 2016.

  • Haq, Ul. M. (2003). The human development paradigm. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. V. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in Human Development (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2013). Aspirations, education and social justice. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., Humphries, J. E., Kautz, T., & Kiknadse, L. (Eds.) (2014). The myth of achievement tests: The GED and the role of character in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, G. (2013). Employability: A capability approach. In A. Boni & M. Walker (Eds.), Human development and capabilities. Reimagining the university of the twenty-first century (pp. 140–159). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loots, S., & Walker, M. (2016). A capabilities-based gender equality policy for higher education: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2015.1076777.

  • McCowan, T., & Unterhalter, E. (2009). Education for democratic citizenship: A capabilities perspective. Background Paper to the Brazil Human Development Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutanga, O., & Walker, M. (2015). Towards a disability-inclusive higher education policy through the capabilities approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2015.1101410.

  • Naidoo, R. (2004). Fields and institutional strategy: Bourdieu on the relationship between higher education, inequality and society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panyane, M. (2016). Young, black, educated, jobless. The Star, June 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, T. (2015). Unlocking the gates to the peasants. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(2), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World Development, 28(2), 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Early Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2006). Three models of education. Theory and Research in Education, 4(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003a). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 3–16). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003b). Human capital and human capability. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 35–37). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004). Why we should preserve the spotted owl. London Review of Books, 26(3), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Early Human Development., 6(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2013). The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1990). Human development report 1990: Concept and measurement of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2015). Human development report 2015: Rethinking work for human development. New York: UNDP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unterhalter, E. (2007). Gender, schooling and global social justice. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, R. P., & Walker, M. (2012). Capabilities, values and education policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press and the Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2016). Context, complexity and change: Education as a conversion factor for non-racist capabilities in a South African university. Race Ethnicity and Education. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2015.1095176.

  • Walker, M. (forthcoming). Aspirations and equality in higher education: Gender in a South African University. Cambridge Journal of Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1254159.

  • Walker, M., & Loots, S. (2016). Social citizenship formation at university: A South African case study. Compare, 46(1), 48–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional education, capabilities and the public good. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (Eds.) (2017). Socially just pedagogies, capabilities and quality in higher education. Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S. (2011). The good university. Paper Presented at the Annual Society in Higher Education (SRHE) Conference, Newport, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Strydom, M. (2015). University access and success: Capabilities, diversity and social justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisor, S., Bessell, S., Castillo, F., Crawford, J., Donaghue, K., Hunt, J., Jaggar, A., Liu, A., & Pogge, T. (2016). The individual deprivation measure. Melbourne: International Women’s Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., & De-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, M., Fongwa, S. (2017). A Human Capabilities Conceptualization of Graduate Employability. In: Universities, Employability and Human Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58452-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58452-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58451-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58452-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics