Abstract
O’Shea, May, Stone and Delahunty have indicated how attending university for first-in-family (FiF) students can lead to significant personal transformation but highlight how the embodied nature of this experience can remain hidden or overlooked in the literature. Equally, the effects that university participation has on those around the student remain unclear, particularly understandings about how their attendance impacts upon the perceptions and ambitions of significant others. This chapter seeks to explore the reactions of family members to this higher education (HE) odyssey, particularly how this decision reverberated within the household. Findings indicate that university participation does not only impact on students in an emotional and potentially transformative sense but also on those closest to them, leading to new conversations in the home place and in some cases, broader educational futures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1), 377–400.
Bennett, T., & Silva, E. (2011). Introduction: Cultural capital—histories, limits, prospects. Poetics, 39, 427–443.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–257). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Croll, P. (2004). Families, social capital and educational outcomes. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(4), 390–416.
Dyke, M. (2011). The extent to which higher education is conceived as ‘within the bounds of possible’. In A. Fuller, S. Heath, & B. Johnston (Eds.), Rethinking widening participation in higher education: The role of social networks (pp. 104–120). London: Routledge.
Feinstein, L., Duckworth, K., & Sabates, R. (2008). Education and the family: Passing success across the generations. London: Routledge.
Gofen, A. (2009). Family capital: How first-generation higher-education students break the intergenerational cycle. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 58, 104–120.
Heath, S., Fuller, A., & Johnston, B. (2011). Introduction. In A. Fuller, S. Heath, & B. Johnston (Eds.), Rethinking widening participation in higher education: The role of socail networks (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Johnston, D., Lee, W., Shah, C., Shields, M., & Spinks, J. (2014). Are neighbourhood characteristics important in predicting the post-school destinations of young Australians? Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
Mercer, J. (2007). Re-negotiating the self through educational development: Mature students’ experiences. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(1), 19–32.
O’Shea, S. (2014). Filling up silences—First in family students, capital and university talk in the home. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(2), 139–155.
O’Shea, S. (2015). “It [university] wasn’t spoken about at home, it was just assumed that we would start working….” First in family students, family capital and higher education participation. In M. Hill, T. Hudson, S. McKendry, N. Raven, D. Saunders, J. Storan, & T. Ward (Eds.), Collaborate to widen participation: To, through and beyond higher education (pp. 223–239). London: FACE Publications.
Pascarella, E., Pierson, C., Wolniak, G., & Terenzini, P. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Schoon, I. (2004). Biographical agency and developmental outcomes. ESRC funded Gender and Equality Network (pp. 1–15). London: City University.
Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative construction of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649.
Wainwright, E., & Marandet, E. (2010). Parents in higher education: Impacts of university learning on the self and the family. Educational Review, 62(4), 449–465.
Wilks, J., & Wilson, K. (2012). Going on to uni? Access and participation in university for students from backgrounds of disadvantage. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 79–90.
Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
Yosso, T., & Garcia, D. (2007). “This is no slum!” A critical race theory analysis of community cultural wealth in Culture Clash’s Chavez Ravine. Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 32(1), 145–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Shea, S., May, J., Stone, C., Delahunty, J. (2017). ‘So How Was Big School Today?’ Family Perceptions of HE Participation. In: First-in-Family Students, University Experience and Family Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58284-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58284-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58283-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58284-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)