Abstract
It is widely recognised that access to university has become necessary for fuller, healthier and more satisfying participation in post-industrial society, as well as for the attainment and maintenance of national prosperity. As a result of this understanding, universities have been strongly encouraged by governments across the globe to widen participation to sectors of society which traditionally did not participate in Higher Education (HE). At the time of writing, cohorts of students, who are the first in their families to access university, are enrolling in unprecedented numbers, and in some cases, make up over 50 per cent of university populations (Spiegler and Bednarek 2013). While the metaphorical door of the tertiary sector has been opened more widely to these students, the welcome mat can be difficult to locate. Indeed, these students have for too long been regarded as ill-equipped guests to the HE party.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brun, C., & Rapp, R. (1999). Strengths-based case management: Individuals’ perspectives on strengths and the case manager relationship. Social Work, 46(3), 278–288.
Cassells, R., Duncan, A., Abello, A., D’Souza, G., & Nepal, B. (2012). Smart Australians: Education and innovation in Australia (AMP. NATSEM income and wealth report (32)). Melbourne: AMP.
Clifton, D., & Nelson, P. (1992). Soar with your strengths. Delacorte Press.
Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82(3), 233–242.
Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. (2003). Welcome home? Examining the “reentry court” concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 91–107.
McKay, J., & Devlin, M. (2016). ‘Low income doesn’t mean stupid and destined for failure’: Challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 347–363.
O’Shea, S., Lysaght, P., Roberts, P., & Harwood, V. (2016a). Shifting the blame in higher education—Social inclusion and deficit discourses. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 322–336.
O’Shea, S., Stone, C., Delahunty, J., & May, J. (2016b). Discourses of betterment and opportunity: Exploring the privileging of university attendance for first-in-family learners. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1212325.
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2008). Strengths based leadership. New York: Gallup Press.
Smit, R. (2012). Toward a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 369–380.
Spiegler, T., & Bednarek, A. (2013). First-generation students: What we ask, what we know and what it means. An international review of the state of research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 23(4), 318–337.
Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2012). Transformations and self-discovery: Stories of women returning to education. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing.
Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Shea, S., May, J., Stone, C., Delahunty, J. (2017). Concluding Thoughts. In: First-in-Family Students, University Experience and Family Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58284-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58284-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58283-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58284-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)