Skip to main content

Friedrich Hayek (1899–1992)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Companion to LSE Economics

Abstract

In the 1930s, Friedrich Hayek emerged as one of the leading economists of his generation. Alongside Lionel Robbins, Hayek made LSE a major player in the marketplace of ideas due to his role in a variety of technical and policy debates against such figures as John Maynard Keynes, Frank Knight, Oskar Lange and Abba Lerner. Boettke and Piano argue that one of these debates, the so-called socialist calculation debate, played a major role in determining the trajectory of Hayek’s career in the decades to come, pushing him to explore a wide array of themes often perceived as beyond the scope of economics proper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an overview of Hayek’s life and intellectual development, see Caldwell (2004).

  2. 2.

    Hayek had also expressed an early interest in analytical psychology after spending the winter of 1920 at the laboratory of brain scientist Constantin von Monakow at the University of Zurich (see Caldwell 2004: 240). His experience in Zurich inspired Hayek to write a short paper in the following summer, which he would later expand in The Sensory Order (Hayek 1952a).

  3. 3.

    On Hayek’s view of the spontaneous evolution of ordered structures in economics and beyond, see Boettke (1990) and Sugden (1989).

  4. 4.

    On Hayek’s relevance to legal theory, see Zywicki and Sanders (2008). For his legacy in political science, see Munger (2016). For economics, see Boettke and O’Donnell (2013) and Bowles et al. (2017).

  5. 5.

    Robbins can thus be seen as belonging to the ‘British Austrian’ tradition as well, as he had attended Mises’ private seminar in Austria in the 1920s and had been strongly influenced by Mises’ methodological teachings plus his writings about socialist economics (see O’Brien 1988).

  6. 6.

    See also Hansen’s review of Hayek’s Prices and Production: ‘The present volume is, it seems to me, the only book of recent years which at all approaches Keynes’s A Treatise on Money in the impetus it has given to renewed interest and discussion of business-cycle theory. This in itself is high praise. Altogether aside from the soundness of its conclusions, the value of the book and its important place in the recent literature of cycle theory is unquestioned’ (Hansen 1933: 332). Moreover, despite Keynes’s perceived ‘victory’ in his battle with Hayek, the latter’s contribution to macroeconomics was not completely ignored during the post-war period. Robert Lucas (1977) explicitly identified Hayek as one of the inspirations for his general equilibrium model of economic fluctuations. Writing around the same time, James Buchanan referred to Hayek’s business cycle theory as follows: ‘As of now, there is really no alternative theory worthy of much respect, and we can predict that more attention will be paid to the seminal Hayekian ideas during the next decades’ (Buchanan 2015: 258).

  7. 7.

    On Knight, see Emmett (2009).

  8. 8.

    See also Boettke et al. (2016).

  9. 9.

    For a discussion of old institutionalism, see Rutherford (2008). On the relationship between Austrian economics and old institutionalism, see Boettke (1989).

  10. 10.

    Hayek himself had worked closely with Mitchell during his stay in the USA in the mid-1920s (see Caldwell 2004: 154).

  11. 11.

    Hayek was not the only economist to have this view. See, among others, Mises (1933 [1976]) and Viner (2013).

  12. 12.

    For a detailed overview of Lerner’s private and scholarly life, see Landes (1994).

  13. 13.

    ‘[T]hough Marxist theory may have provided the foundations for the analysis of capitalism, it was neoclassical economics that provided the blueprint for a working model of socialism’ (Boettke et al. 2010: 79).

  14. 14.

    For a history of the socialist calculation debate, see Lavoie (1985) and Boettke (2000).

  15. 15.

    Although he never endorsed the equation-solving approach during the socialist calculation debate, Oskar Lange revived it almost three decades later (see Lange 1967).

  16. 16.

    For a critical assessment of the Lange model from a standard neoclassical perspective, see Bergson (1967).

  17. 17.

    Indeed, the socialist economy will outperform real-world market economies as it would not suffer from the detrimental effects of the widespread presence of market power and technological externalities and will not produce macroeconomic crises (see Lange 1937).

  18. 18.

    Lerner (1937: 253) argued that the optimal allocation of resources must be the goal of any rational direction of the economy: ‘If we so order economic activity of the alternative that is sacrificed, we shall have completely achieved the ideal that the economic calculus of a socialist state sets before itself’.

  19. 19.

    Hayek believed that his argument was complementary to that of Mises: ‘I found out that the whole Mises argument about calculation really ultimately rested on the same idea [about the dispersed and subjective nature of knowledge], and that drove me to the ‘37 article, which then became the systematic basis of my further development’ (Hayek 1978: 383).

  20. 20.

    For modern formulations of the Austrian notion of economic knowledge, see, among others, Lachmann (1986), Boettke (2001), and O’Driscoll and Rizzo (2014).

  21. 21.

    In a market economy, prices serve three functions: ex-ante guides to exchange and production; ex-post assessments of previous decisions through the profit and loss mechanism; and signals for the existence of discrepancies between ex-ante and ex-post prices, which set in motion the discovery process within the market.

References

Main Works by Friedrich Hayek

  • Hayek, F.A. (1931a). ‘Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J.M. Keynes’. Economica, 33(August): 270–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1931b). ‘A Rejoinder to Mr. Keynes’. Economica, 34(November): 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1931c). Prices and Production. New York: Kelley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1933). ‘The Trend of Economic Thinking’. Economica, 40(May): 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (ed.) (1935). Collectivist Economic Planning. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1937). ‘Economics and Knowledge’. Economica, New Series, 4(13): 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1941). ‘The Counter-Revolution of Science’. Economica, New Series, 8(31): 281–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1942). ‘Scientism and the Study of Society. Part I’. Economica, New Series, 9(35): 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1943). ‘Scientism and the Study of Society. Part II’. Economica, New Series, 10(37): 34–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1944a). The Road to Serfdom. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1944b). ‘Scientism and the Study of Society. Part III’. Economica, New Series, 11(41): 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1945). ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’. American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952a). The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952b). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1960) [2011]. The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. Volume 17 of the Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. Edited by Ronald Hamowy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1973–1979) [2013]. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1978). UCLA Oral History Interview. University of California, Los Angeles: Oral History Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Volume 1 of the Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. Edited by W.W. Bartley III. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Other Works Referred To

  • Barone, E. (1935). ‘The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State’. Appendix in F.A. Hayek (ed.) Collectivist Economic Planning. Abingdon: Routledge: 245–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1967). ‘Market Socialism Revisited’. Journal of Political Economy, 75(5): 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (1989). ‘Evolution and Economics: Austrians as Institutionalists’. In Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Volume 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (1990). ‘The Theory of Spontaneous Order and Cultural Evolution in the Social Theory of F.A. Hayek’. Cultural Dynamics, 3(1): 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (1997). ‘Where did Economics go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight from Reality’. Critical Review, 11(1): 11–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (ed.) (2000). Socialism and the Market: The Socialist Calculation Debate Revisited. Nine volumes. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (2001). Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. (2006). ‘Hayek and Market Socialism’. Chapter 3 in E. Feser (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. and K.W. O’Donnell (2013). ‘The Failed Appropriation of F.A. Hayek by Formalist Economics’. Critical Review, 25(3–4): 305–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J., E.C. Shaeffer and N.A. Snow (2010). ‘The Context of Context: The Evolution of Hayek’s Epistemic Turn in Economics and Politics’. Chapter 3 in R. Koppl, S. Horwitz and P. Desrochers (eds) What Is So Austrian About Austrian Economics? Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 14. Bingley: Emerald Group: 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J., V. Tarko and P. Aligica (2016). ‘Why Hayek Matters: The Epistemic Dimension of Comparative Institutional Analysis’. Chapter 7 in Revisiting Hayek’s Political Economy. Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 21. Bingley: Emerald Group: 163–185.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P.J. and K.I. Vaughn (2002). ‘Knight and the Austrians on Capital, and the Problem of Socialism’. History of Political Economy, 34(1): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., A. Kirman and R. Sethi (2017). ‘Friedrich Hayek and the Market Algorithm’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3): 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (2015). ‘NOTES ON HAYEK—Miami, 15 February 1979’. Review of Austrian Economics, 28(3): 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1937). ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica, New Series, 4(16): 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1988). ‘The Nature of the Firm: Origin’. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1): 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, H.D. (1933). ‘Price Formation in a Socialist Community’. Economic Journal, 43(170): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, H.D. (1939). Economics of Socialism. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, E.F.M. (1936). ‘Economic Calculus in a Planned Economy’. Economic Journal, 46(184): 676–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, R.B. (2009). Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M.I. (1971). Comparative Economic Systems: A Reader. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.H. (1933). ‘Review of Prices and Production, by F.A. Hayek’. American Economic Review, 23(2): 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. (1967). ‘The Hayek Story’. Chapter 12 in Critical Essays in Monetary Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1970). Investment, Interest and Capital. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L. (1973). ‘The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation’. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 63(2): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1930) [1971]. A Treatise on Money: The Applied Theory of Money. Volume VI of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1931). ‘The Pure Theory of Money. A Reply to Dr. Hayek’. Economica, 34(November): 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1988). ‘The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Austrians’. Review of Austrian Economics, 2(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I.M. (1999). ‘Philip Wicksteed: The British Austrian’. Chapter 7 in R.G. Holcombe (ed.) 15 Great Austrian Economists. Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F.H. (1937). ‘Unemployment: And Mr. Keynes’s Revolution in Economic Theory’. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 3(1): 100–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1977). Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (1986). The Market as an Economic Process. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D.S. (1994). ‘Abba Ptachya Lerner’. Biographical Memoirs. Volume 64. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. (1936). ‘On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part One’. Review of Economic Studies, 4(1): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. (1937). ‘On the Economic Theory of Socialism: Part Two’. Review of Economic Studies, 4(2): 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. (1967). ‘The Computer and the Market’. In C.H. Feinstein (ed.) Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1985). Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A. (1932). ‘The Diagrammatical Representation of Cost Conditions in International Trade’. Economica, 37(August): 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1934a). ‘The Diagrammatical Representation of Demand Conditions in International Trade’. Economica, New Series, 1(3): 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1934b). ‘The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power’. Review of Economic Studies, 1(3): 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1934c). ‘Economic Theory and Socialist Economy’. Review of Economic Studies, 2(1): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1936a). ‘The Symmetry between Import and Export Taxes’. Economica, New Series, 3(11): 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1936b). ‘A Note on Socialist Economics’. Review of Economic Studies, 4(1): 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1937). ‘Statics and Dynamics in Socialist Economics’. Economic Journal, 47(186): 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A.P. (1938). ‘Theory and Practice in Socialist Economics’. Review of Economic Studies, 6(1): 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., Jr. (1977). ‘Understanding Business Cycles’. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 5: 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S. (2011). ‘Chicago Price Theory and Chicago Law and Economics: A Tale of Two Transitions’. Chapter 6 in R. van Horn, P. Mirowski and T.A. Stapleford (eds) Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America’s Most Powerful Economics Program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1920) [1935]. ‘Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth’. Chapter III in F.A. Hayek (ed.) Collectivist Economic Planning. Abingdon: Routledge: 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1933) [1976]. Epistemological Problems of Economics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, M.C. (2016). ‘Hayek’s Political Insights: Emergent Orders and Laid On Laws’. Chapter 6 in P.J. Boettke and V.H. Storr (eds) Revisiting Hayek’s Political Economy. Advances in Austrian Economics, Volume 21. Bingley: Emerald: 145–161.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D.P. (1988). Lionel Robbins. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, G.P., Jr. and M. Rizzo (2014). Austrian Economics Re-Examined: The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of Political Economy. Translated by A.S. Schwier and edited by A.S. Schwier and A. Page. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piano, E.E. and P.J. Boettke (forthcoming). ‘Rationality of the Individual and Rationality of the System’. In D. Iorio (ed.) The Mystery of Rationality: Mind Beliefs and Social Science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B. (2010). ‘Some Implications of Capital Heterogeneity’. Chapter 9 in P.J. Boettke (ed.) Handbook on Contemporary Austrian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 124–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. (2008). ‘Institutionalism, Old’. In S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Online edition. Available at: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057%2F978-1-349-95121-5_2747-1.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1936). ‘Review of The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, by J.M. Keynes’. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 31(196): 791–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1989). ‘Spontaneous Order’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1936). ‘Mr. Keynes on the Causes of Unemployment’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(1): 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (2013). Jacob Viner: Lectures in Economics 301. Edited by D.A. Irwin and S.G. Medema. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L.H. (2012). The Clash of Economic Ideas: The Great Policy Debates and Experiments of the Last Hundred Years. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zywicki, T.J. and A.B. Sanders (2008). ‘Posner, Hayek, and the Economic Analysis of Law’. Iowa Law Review, 93(2): 559–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Boettke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boettke, P.J., Piano, E.E. (2019). Friedrich Hayek (1899–1992). In: Cord, R.A. (eds) The Palgrave Companion to LSE Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58274-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58274-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58273-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58274-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics