Advertisement

9 Shame, Disgust and the Moral Economies of Young Women’s Sexual Health in the North of England

  • Louise Laverty
Chapter

Abstract

The range of austerity measures implemented in the UK following the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 has been accompanied by, and justified through, emotive and stigmatising discourses that recast blame on those suffering the greatest inequalities (Clayton et al. 2015; Tyler 2013). As a number of authors have noted, heightened stigmatisation in recent UK public and political discourse has created a division between the ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor in society (Hancock and Mooney 2012; Tyler 2013; Wacquant 2009; Wacquant 2008). Most notably, as part of this shift in attitudes, poverty has been recast as the moral failure of the individual rather than the result of structural inequalities (Slater 2014; Valentine and Harris 2014; Wacquant 2008). This discourse is particularly evident in the UK’s Child Poverty Strategy (2011, p.4) where behavioural rather than structural causes are outlined. The cause of child poverty, according to this strategy, is ‘a lack of opportunity, aspiration and stability’ among children and their families, a lack that can be tackled by reducing criminality, teenage pregnancies and risky behaviour. To experience poverty, therefore, is to occupy a stigmatised social position (Ridge 2011; Ridge 2009; Sutton 2009) that people seek to distance and differentiate themselves from (Shildrick and MacDonald 2013).

References

  1. Adam, B.D. 2005. Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers. Culture, Health & Sexuality 7: 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, R. 2008. Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we. Social Science & Medicine 67: 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. 2012. UN says Liverpool has drug-related ‘no-go areas’ like those in Brazilian favelas. The Independent [online]. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/un-says-liverpool-has-drug-related-no-go-areas-like-those-in-brazilian-favelas-7462654.html. Accessed 6 June 2014.
  5. Burris, S. 2008. Stigma, ethics and policy: A commentary on Bayer’s “Stigma and the ethics of public health: Not can we but should we”. Social Science & Medicine 67: 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabinet Office. 2011. PM’s speech on the fightback after the riots. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pms-speech-on-the-fightback-after-the-riots. Accessed 12 Mar 2014
  7. Chowdry, H., and C. Emmerson. 2010. An Efficient Maintenance Allowance? London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, P.H. 1993. The social construction of help among Danish children: The intentional act and the actual content. Sociology of Health & Illness 15: 488–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clayton, J., C. Donovan, and J. Merchant. 2015. Emotions of austerity: Care and commitment in public service delivery in the North East of England. Emotion, Space and Society 14: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deigh, J. 2006. The politics of disgust and shame. The Journal of Ethics 10: 383–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Communities and Local Government. 2015. The English Indices of Deprivation 2015. London: National Statistics.Google Scholar
  12. Department for Work and Pensions & Department for Education. 2011. A New Approach to Child Poverty: Tackling the Causes of Disadvantage and Transforming Families’ Lives. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  13. Fletcher, A., F. Gardner, M. Mckee, and C. Bonell. 2012. The British Government’s Troubled Families Programme. BMJ 344: e3403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, L.J. 2007. (Re)Visioning the Centre: Education reform and the ‘ideal’ citizen of the future. Educational Philosophy and Theory 39: 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hancock, L., and G. Mooney. 2012. “Welfare Ghettos” and the “Broken Society”: Territorial Stigmatization in the Contemporary UK. Housing, Theory and Society 30: 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, A. 2004. Future Girl. In Young women in the 21st Century. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild, A.R. 1979. Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 85: 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, A., C. Jenks, and A. Prout. 1998. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. James, A., and A. Prout, eds. 1997. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London, Washington: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Karaian, L. 2014. Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology 18: 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolnai, A. 2004. On Disgust. Peru, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. Kolnai, A., B. Smith, and C. Korsmeyer, eds. 2004. On disgust. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  26. Lawler, S. 2005. Disgusted subjects: The making of middle-class identities. The Sociological Review 53: 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leinaweaver, J. 2014. Informal Kinship-Based Fostering Around the World: Anthropological Findings. Child Development Perspectives 8: 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leinaweaver, J.B. 2013. Towards an Anthropology of Ingratitude: Notes from Andean Kinship. Comparative Studies in Society and History 55: 554–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis, M. 1992. Shame: The Exposed Self. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lupton, D. 2014. The pedagogy of disgust: The ethical, moral and political implications of using disgust in public health campaigns. Critical Public Health 25: 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lutz, C.A. 1990. Engendered emotion: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse. In Language and the politics of emotion, eds. C.A. Lutz and L. Abu-Lughod. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lutz, C.A., and L. Abu-Lughod, eds. 1990. Language and the politics of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Manion, J.C. 2003. Girls Blush, Sometimes: Gender, Moral Agency, and the Problem of Shame. Hypatia 18: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattis, J.S., N.A. Grayman, S.-A. Cowie, C. Winston, C. Watson, and D. Jackson. 2008. Intersectional Identities and the Politics of Altruistic Care in a Low-Income, Urban Community. Sex Roles 59: 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mccall, L. 2005. The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs 30: 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nayak, A., and M.J. Kehily. 2014. ‘Chavs, chavettes and pramface girls’: Teenage mothers, marginalised young men and the management of stigma. Journal of Youth Studies 17: 1330–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Opotow, S. 1990. Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues 46: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Probyn, E. 2004. Blush: Faces of Shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  39. Puwar, N. 2006. Im/possible Inhabitations. In The Situated Politics of Belonging, eds. N. Yuval-Davis, K. Kannabiran, and U. Vieten. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Renold, E., and J. Ringrose. 2008. Regulation and rupture: Mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory 9: 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2011. Schizoid subjectivities?: Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualization’. Journal of Sociology 47: 389–409.Google Scholar
  42. Ridge, T. 2009. Living with poverty: A review of the literature on children’s and families’ experiences of poverty. London: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2011. The Everyday Costs of Poverty in Childhood: A Review of Qualitative Research Exploring the Lives and Experiences of Low-Income Children in the UK. Children & Society 25: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ringrose, J., and K.E. Barajas. 2011. Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploring teen girls’ digitized sexual identities in postfeminist media contexts. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 7: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2012. Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education 24: 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rose, N. 1996. The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society 25: 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sayer, A. 2005. Class, Moral Worth and Recognition. Sociology 39: 947–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scambler, G. 2004. Re-framing Stigma: Felt and Enacted Stigma and Challenges to the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions. Social Theory & Health 2: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2009. Health-related stigma. Sociology of Health & Illness 31: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shildrick, T., and R. Macdonald. 2013. Poverty talk: How people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’. The Sociological Review 61: 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skeggs, B. 1997. Formations of Class and Gende: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Skeggs, B. 2005. The Making of Class and Gender through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation. Sociology 39: 965–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slater, T. 2014. The Myth of “Broken Britain”: Welfare Reform and the Production of Ignorance. Antipode 46: 948–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sutton, L. 2009. ‘They’d only call you a scally if you are poor’: The impact of socio-economic status on children’s identities. Children’s Geographies 7: 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. The UK Government. 2012. Welfare Reform Act 2012. The United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  56. Tyler, I. 2013. The Riots of the Underclass?: Stigmatisation, Mediation and the Government of Poverty and Disadvantage in Neoliberal Britain. Sociological Research Online 18: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valentine, G., and C. Harris. 2014. Strivers vs skivers: Class prejudice and the demonisation of dependency in everyday life. Geoforum 53: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wacquant, L. 2007. Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality. Thesis Eleven 91: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 2009. Punishing the Poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walkerdine, S. 2011. Shame on you! Intergenerational Trauma and Working Class Femininity on Reality TV. In Reality Television and Class, eds. H. Wood and B. Skeggs. London: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the London Film Institute.Google Scholar
  62. Wolcott, H.F. 1999. Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. Oxford, UK: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Laverty
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations