Advertisement

Is Neo-Liberal Capitalism Eating Itself or Its Young?

  • Peter Kelly
  • Jo Pike
Chapter

Abstract

As we finalise the introduction to what we think is an important, and timely, examination of the relationships between a globalising neo-Liberal capitalism, a post-2008–2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) environment of recession and austerity, and the moral economies of young people’s health and well-being, it appears that neo-Liberal, globalised capitalism might be about to eat itself … again. And if not itself, then it will continue, it seems, to devour its young.

Keywords

Young People European Union Global Financial Crisis Sovereign Debt School Meal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chakrabortty, A. 2016. We’ve been conned by the rich predators of Davos. The Guardian, January 19. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/19/davos-super-rich-wealth-inequality. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  2. Dogan, M. 2010. When Neoliberalism Confronts the Moral Economy of Workers: The Final Spring of Turkish Labor Unions. European Journal of Turkish Studies [En ligne], 11 | 2010, mis en ligne le 05 octobre 2010, Consulté le 10 avril 2015. Available from http://ejts.revues.org/4321. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  3. Elliott, L. 2012. Britain’s richest 5% gained most from quantitative easing—Bank of England. The Guardian, August 23. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/aug/23/britains-richest-gained-quantative-easing-bank. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  4. Eurostat. 2015. Unemployment Statistics, December 2015. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  5. ———. 2016. Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex and age (NEET rates), January 2016. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-datasets/-/EDAT_LFSE_20. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  6. Fletcher, N. 2016. Sell everything ahead of stock market crash, say RBS economists. The Guardian, January 12. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/12/sell-everything-ahead-of-stock-market-crash-say-rbs-economists. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  7. Foucault, M. 1983. The Subject and Power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, eds. H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1985. The Use of Pleasure. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1986. The Care of the Self. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality, eds. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, R. 2013. Druckenmiller: Fed robbing poor to pay rich. CNBC, September 19. Available from http://www.cnbc.com/2013/09/19/druckenmiller-fed-shifting-money-to-rich-from-poneo-Liberal%20ascendency%20or.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  12. Gray, J. 2014. The Silence of Animals: On Progress and Other Modern Myths. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, S., D. Massey, and M. Rustin, eds. 2013a. After neoliberalism? The Kilburn manifesto, Soundings. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2013b. After neoliberalism: analysing the present. In After neoliberalism? The Kilburn manifesto, Soundings, eds. S. Hall, D. Massey, and M. Rustin. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, P. 2013. The Self as Enterprise: Foucault and the “Spirit” of 21st Century Capitalism. Aldershot: Ashgate/Gower.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2016. Growing up After the GFC: Responsibilisation and Mortgaged Futures. Discourse. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1104852.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, P., and A. Kamp. 2015. A Critical Youth Studies for the 21st Century. Amsterdam/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, R. and Smith, D. (2011). Introduction: Geographies of Morality and Moralities of Geography, in R. Lee and D. M. (eds) Geographies and Moralities: International Perspectives on Development, Justice and Peace, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Max Planck Institute. 2016. The International Max Planck Research School for Moral Economies of Modern Societies. Available from https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en/research/research-schools/imprs-moral-economies. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  21. Morrow, V. 2009. The global financial crisis and children’s happiness: a time for re-visioning?, Childhood 16 (3) 293–298.Google Scholar
  22. Nietzsche, F. 2003. The Genealogy of Morals. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Oxfam. 2016. 62 people own same as half worldOxfam. Press release, January 18. Available from http://www.oxfam.org.uk/media-centre/press-releases/2016/01/62-people-own-same-as-half-world-says-oxfam-inequality-report-davos-world-economic-forum. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  24. Pike, J., and P. Kelly. 2014. The Moral Geographies of Children, Young People and Food: Beyond Jamie’s School Dinners. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Proctor, J.D., and D.M. Smith, eds. 1999. Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sack, R.D. 1993. Homo Geographicus: A Framework for Action, Awareness, and Moral Concern. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2003. A Geographical Guide to the Real and the Good. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Saez, E. 2015. Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States. Available from https://eml.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  31. Sayer, A. 2000. Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy 61(1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2004a. Moral Economy. Available from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/sayer-moral-economy.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  33. ———. 2004b. Agendas for Moral Economy. Moral Economy: Agendas for the Future. Workshop held on July 6th 2004, at the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YD, UK.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, D.M. 1997. Geography and ethics: a moral turn? Progress in Human Geography 21(4): 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2000. Moral Geographies: Ethics in a world of difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stuckler, D., and S. Basu. 2013. The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills. New Yok: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Thompson, E.P. 1971. The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past & Present 50(1): 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thrift, N. 2005. Knowing Capitalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, M. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Capitalism: and Other Writings. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). 1946. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Kelly
    • 1
  • Jo Pike
    • 2
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations