Skip to main content

Pension Privatization in Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

More than twenty years have passed since the World Bank published its influential report ‘Averting the Old Age Crisis’ recommending countries to adopt a privatized pillar in their pension systems. The case study of Israel, which adopted the recommendations, enables an evaluation of a pension privatization which followed these recommendations. The case study of Israel shows that privatization leads to inequality: inequality of benefits, inequality of services, and inequality of pension coverage. The chapter suggests that appropriate regulation, as well as an inclusive process of pension reform (including consultations with unions, employers and NGOs), may alleviate the system’s problems.

This chapter is based on: Lurie (2015, in Hebrew).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, Karen M. 2001. The Politics of Retrenchment in a Social Democratic Welfare State: Reform of Swedish Pensions and Unemployment Insurance. Comparative Political Studies 34 (9): 1063–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Karen M., and Traute Meyer. 2003. Social Democracy, Unions, and Pensions Politics in Germany and Sweden. Journal of Public Policy 23 (1): 23–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Svein S., and Kjell A. Eliassen (eds.). 1998. Introduction: Dilemmas, Contradictions and the Future of European Democracy. In The European Union: How Democratic Is It? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaro, Lucio. 2002. Negotiating the Italian Pension Reform with the Unions: Lessons for Corporatist Theory. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55 (3): 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beland, Daniel. 2001. Does Labor Matter? Institutions, Labor Unions and Pension Reform in France and the United States. Journal of Public Policy 21 (2): 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, David. 2004. Contracting Out the State Pension System: The British Experience of Carrots and Sticks. In Rethinking the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Pension Reform, ed. Martin Rein and Winfried Schmähl. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano. 2000. The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brender, Adi. 2011. First Year of the Mandatory Pension Arrangement: Compliance with the Arrangement as an Indication of Its Potential Implications for Labor Supply. Discussion Paper No. 2011.05, Bank of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Zone Books. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, Peter, Laurie Bassi, Harry Katz, David Knoze, Paul Osterman, and Michael Useem (eds.). 1997. Change at Work. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics). 2005. Social Survey 2002: Pensions and Retirement Savings. Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Bryn. 2000. The Structure of Pension Reform in the United Kingdom in Social Dialogue and Pension Reform. In Social Dialogue and Pension Reform, ed. Emmanuel Reynaud. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavious, Ilanit, Avia Spivak, and Rami Yosef. 2009. Pension Reform in Israel Under Mandatory Pension Law. Pensions 14: 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarducci, Teresa, and Patricia Ledesma Liébana. 2000. Unions’ Role in Argentine and Chilean Pension Reform. World Development 28 (4): 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi. 2008. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogot, Tehila, and Momi Dahan. 2012. Do you Look Forward to Retirement? Motivational Biases in Experts’ Pension Decisions. Judgment and Decision Making 7 (3): 282–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacireno-Paquet, Natalie, Thomas T. Holyyoke, and Michele Moser. 2002. Creaming Versus Croping: Charter School Enrollment Practices in Response to Market Incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (2): 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, Lilach. 2010. Mandatory Occupational Pension in Israel: Legislation v. Collective Agreements. Labour, Society and the Law 12: 469–514 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, Lilach. 2015. Privatizing Occupational Pension in Israel. In Privatization Policy in Israel: State Responsibility and the Boundaries Between the Public and the Private, 320–356. Jerusalem: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, Lilach. 2017. Pension Privatisation—Benefits and Costs. Industrial Law Journal (UK). dwx021, https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, Brigitte C., and Dennis F. Shea. 2001. The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Saving Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4): 1149–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1994. Social Security in Latin America: Toward Alleviating the Social Costs of Economic Reform. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1998. Pension Reform Around the World: Comparative Features and Performance of Structural Pension Reforms in Latin America. Brooklyn Law Review 64: 771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 2000. Experiences in the Americas with Social Security Reform: Lessons for Workers and Unions’. In Social Protection: What Workers Should Know, ed. Manuel Simón Velasco. (ILO, Labour Education 2000/4, No. 121(51)). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/socsec/download/labeduce.pdf.

  • Mesa-Lago, Carmelo, and Katrin Muller. 2002. The Politics of Pension Reform in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 34: 687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minns, Richard, and Ron Martin. 1996. Pension Funds in the United Kingdom: Centralization and Control. In International Perspectives on Supplementary Pensions, ed. Emmanuel Reynaud, Lucy apRoberts, Bryn Davis, and Gerard Hughes. Westport, CT: Quorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Kathryn L. 2000. Partial Privatization of Social Security: Assessing Its Effect on Women, Minorities, and Lower-Income Workers. Missouri Law Review 65 (2): 341–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, John. 1984. Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naczyk, Marek, and Stefan Domonkos. 2015. The Financial Crisis and Varieties of Pension Privatization in Eastern Europe. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 29 (2): 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Insurance Institute of Israel. 2007a. NII Opinion with Regard to Economic Policy 2008. https://www.btl.gov.il/SiteCollectionDocuments/btl/Publications/PersumimNossafim/mediniyutKal.pdf.

  • National Insurance Institute of Israel. 2007b. Quarterly Statistics (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Insurance Institute of Israel. 2015. Annual Report (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010. Reviews of Labour Market and Social Policies in Israel. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. Pension at a Glance 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2008. Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratson, Michal. 2009–2010. Policy Entrepreneurs, Political Constructions and Windows of Opportunity: The Politics of the Second Pension Reform in Israel. Israeli Sociology: A Journal for the Study of Society in Israel 11 (2): 463–484 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, Annalisa. 2003. Representation of Interests, Participatory Democracy and Lawmaking in Europe Union: Which Role and Which Rules for the Social Partners? Jean Monnet Working Paper 15/03, New York University School of Law, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, Emmanuel (ed.). 2000. Social Dialogue and Pension Reform. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Günther, and Bernard Gazier (eds.). 2002. The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration Through Transitional Labour Markets. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmeyer, Heinz-Dietrich. 2000. Monitoring and Reform of Pensions in Germany Social Dialogue and Pension Reform. In Social Dialogue and Pension Reform, ed. Emmanuel Reynaud, 44–45. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Steven L., and Morris M. Kleiner. 1992. The Effect of Two-Tier Collective Bargaining Agreements on Shareholder Equity. ILR Review 45 (2): 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2011. Institutional Layering: A Review of the Use of the Concept. Politics 31 (1): 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Slyke, David M. 2003. The Mythology of Privatization in Contracting for Services. Public Administration Review 63 (3): 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1994. In Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. A World Bank Policy Research Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press for World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosef, Rami, and Avia Spivak. 2008. The New Pension World: After the Big Bang of 2003. Policy Studies. Jerusalem: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Insurance Law (consolidated version). 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retirement Age Law. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supervision of Financial Services Law (Provident Funds). 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Decision 1134, Steps to Reduce Social Gaps and Increase the Labor Force Participation Rate, from 4 February 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tel-Aviv Labor Court 1742/08 Tuti Ashbal v. Harel (17.8.14).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilach Lurie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lurie, L. (2018). Pension Privatization in Israel. In: Paz-Fuchs, A., Mandelkern, R., Galnoor, I. (eds) The Privatization of Israel. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58261-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics