Skip to main content

Privatization Policy: The Burden of Proof

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Privatization of Israel

Abstract

Despite being the most significant, comprehensive and consistent policy since the mid-1980s, the consequences of privatization in Israel have never been properly evaluated. The chapter presents common attitudes—supportive and negative—regarding privatization and explains why they could be regarded as proverbs rather than sound reasoning. Next, the attempt to build a private for-profit prison in Israel is discussed as an example of confused policy and of the blurring of boundaries between government, business, and social organizations. The concluding section suggests that privatization is not just an economic issue, but closely related to the desired relationship between the state and its citizens. Accordingly, the burden of proof falls on those who wish to shift the boundaries between the public and the private.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ansell, C. 2012. Collaborative Governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, ed. D. Levi-Faur, 499–511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben David, L., and Y. Truan. 2006. Privatization of Prisons: A Comparative Perspective. The Knesset Information and Research Center (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (ed.). 2005. Joined-up Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booher, D. 2004. Collaborative Governance Practices and Democracy. National Civic Review 93 (4): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. 1965. The Public Finances. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, R. 2005. The Rise and Stall of Prison Privatization. Criminal Justice Policy Review 16 (4): 412–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, J.D., and R.J. Zeckhauser. 2012. Collaborative Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feely, M.M. 2013. The Unconvincing Case Against Private Prisons. Indiana Law Journal 89: 1401–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fercshtman, H. 2007. The Boundaries of Privatization (in Hebrew). The Economic and Social Program, The Van Leer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor Report. 2003. The Third Sector in Israel and Government Policy. Beer Sheva: The Israel Center for Third Sector Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, I. 2006. Perhaps We Should Also Privatize the Courts? (in Hebrew). Haaretz, August 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galnoor, I., and J. Oser. 2015. Civil Service, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 695–700. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, B.M. 1964. The Managing of Organizations. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunau, R. 2012. The Privatization of Social Services in Israel: Queries and Concerns. The State of the Nation 2011–2012, 363–414. The Taub Center (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, A. 2008. Why Only the State may Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions. Legal Theory 14: 110–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, N. 2017. To Understand Rising Inequality, Consider the Janitors at Two Top Companies, Then and Now. New York times, September 3. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/03/upshot/to-understand-rising-inequality-consider-the-janitors-at-two-top-companies-then-and-now.html?referer. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.

  • Keast, R., and M. Mandell. 2014. The Collaborative Push: Moving Beyond Rhetoric and Gaining Evidence. Journal of Management and Governance 18 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Private Vs. Public Sector Myths. London: Anthem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. 1998. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, III ed., 452–453. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A., and A.T. Peacock (eds.). 1958. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolf, L.D., and H. Seidman. 1980. The Blurred Boundaries of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 40 (20): 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T.C., and J. Maahs. 1999. Are Private Prisons More Cost-effective Than Public Prisons? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Research Studies. NCCD News 45 (3): 358–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, J. 2013. Globalization(s), Privatization(s), Constitutionalization, and Stabilization: Icons and Experiences of Sovereignty in the 21st Century. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (3): 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolnick, G. 2003. Netanyahu Present: The Fat & The Thin (in Hebrew). The Marker, March 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, L.M., and H.K. Anheier. 1998. The Emerging Sector Revisited. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1946. The Proverbs of Administration. Public Administration Review 6 (1): 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timor, U. 2006. Privatization of Prisons in Israel. Israel Law Review 39 (1): 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg Report. 2011. The Committe for Socio-Economic Change Jerusalem: Prime Minister Office (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbina, I., and S. Hamill. 2009. Judges Plead Guilty in Scheme to Jail Youth for Profit. New York Times, February 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • USA Federal Government. 1998. Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998. Public law 105–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. 2004. Collaborative Public Administration: Some Lessons from the Israeli Experience. Managerial Auditing Journal 19 (6): 77–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volokh, A. 2012. Privatization and the Elusive Employee-Contractor Distinction. University of California Davis Law Review 46: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. 2012. Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, V. 2000. Blurring the Public-Private Divide. In Governance in the Twenty-First Century, ed. B.C. Peters and D.J. Savoie, 157–179. Montreal: McGill University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonah, Y., and A. Spivak (eds.). 2012. To Do Things Differently, The Social Protest of 2011–2012. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuhad (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Galnoor, I. (2018). Privatization Policy: The Burden of Proof. In: Paz-Fuchs, A., Mandelkern, R., Galnoor, I. (eds) The Privatization of Israel. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58261-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics