Skip to main content

The Birth of the Education President: From Local Control to Common Core

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Reform in the Obama Era

Part of the book series: Education Policy ((EDPOLICY))

  • 350 Accesses

Abstract

On November 20, 2007, then-Senator Barack Obama addressed a crowd in Manchester, New Hampshire. At the time, he was locked in a three-way battle in the Democratic primary, behind Senator Hillary Clinton and not far ahead of former Senator Jonathan Edwards. The next day, Oprah would announce that she planned to campaign with Obama in three early primary states, a move that was to elevate his campaign to a new level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pierce v. Society of Sisters 268 U.S. 510 (1925): The original claim brought forth in Pierce stemmed from Oregon’s Compulsory Education Act of 1922 prohibiting parents from enrolling their children in any school that was not a public school, stemming from post–World War I feelings of xenophobia and nativism. This law in effect outlawed Catholic and all other private schools in the state of Oregon and led to separate lawsuits against Oregon Governor Walter Pierce from the Society of Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary and Hill Military Academy. The Sisters who ran an orphanage and religious school alleged that the law infringed primarily on their First Amendment rights and secondarily on their Fourteenth Amendment Rights of property protection. Hill Military Academy sued separately from the Sisters and claimed the law violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights by preventing them from running a business. The schools won their suit in an Oregon District Court, which led to an immediate appeal to the US Supreme Court, which unanimously upheld the lower court’s decision and wrote in their decision that parents’ decisions to enroll their child in a private school is a liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Interestingly, the Court’s decision did not consider First Amendment implications of the Compulsory Education Law.

  2. 2.

    Even so, some public-private partnerships remained. For example, since the mid-1800s, Maine and Vermont have funded “tuitioning” programs in which school districts without public schools pay student tuition at either public or private schools elsewhere, forerunners of today’s school voucher programs (Maddaus and Mirochnik 1992).

  3. 3.

    In 2009 the total education expenditure (Local, State, and Federal) in the USA was over $600 billion.

References

  • Abernathy, S. F. (2005). School choice and the future of American democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R. (2003). Judging school discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T. H. (1988). The thirteenth man. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, W. J. (1992). The de-valuing of America: The fight for our culture and our children. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1996). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, S. (2011). Class warfare: Inside the fight to save America’s schools. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouillette, L. (1996). A geology of school reform. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A., Lee, V., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. S. (2010). Acting White. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, S. M., Doyle, D. P., & Thomas, D. A. (2009). Leading for equity: The pursuit of excellence in the Montgomery County Public Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Great City Schools. 2010. Beating the Odds: Analysis of Student Performance on State Assessments and NAEP. Washington: Council of Great City Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. A. (1980). American education: The national experience, 1783–1876. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, W. W. (2000). Parents and schools: The 150-year struggle for control in American education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadayan, L., & Ward, R. B. (2011). State and local government employment shows broad, continuing declines. The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, SUNY Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherity, B. J. (2011). Desegregation in public schools. Encyclopedia Virginia. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from http://www.EncyclopediaVirginia.org/Desegregation_in_Public_Schools

  • DeBray-Pelot, E. (2007). Dismantling education’s ‘iron triangle’: Institutional relationships in the formation of federal education policy between 1998 and 2001. In C. F. Kaestle & A. E. Lodewick (Eds.), To educate a nation (pp. 64–90). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. (2010). The impact of No Child Left Behind on students, teachers, and schools. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (pp. 149–207). Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descry, C., & Martin-Bemer, A. (2001). Unscrewed!: The education of Annie. Prescott: SRES Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidenberg, E., & Morey, R. D. (1969). An act of Congress. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, D. J. (1971). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2010). The 10 most wanted enemies of American public education’s school leadership. UCEA Review, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C. E., Jr. (2008). Troublemaker. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C. E., Jr. (2010). The end of the education debate. National Affairs, Issue 2, Winter 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franciosi, R. J. (2004). The rise and fall of American public schools. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. G. (2011). Barack Obama’s first two years: Policy accomplishments, political failure. In A. Dowdle, D. C. van Raemdonck, & R. Maranto (Eds.), The Obama presidency (pp. 187–200). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, D. (2007). From progressivism to federalism: The pursuit of equal educational opportunity, 1915–1965. In C. F. Kaestle & A. E. Lodewick (Eds.), To educate a nation (pp. 177–201). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. (2003). The human capital century. Education Next.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (2013). The great stagnation of American education. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/07/the-great-stagnation-of-american-education/?_r=0

  • Greene, J. P. (2005). Education myths. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2009). Obama offers ‘race to the top’ program for schools. Guardian, July 24. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/8625198?FORM=ZZNR7

  • Guthrie, J. W., & Peng, A. (2010). A warning for all who would listen. In F. M. Hess & E. Osberg (Eds.), Stretching the school dollar (pp. 19–44). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. D. (2003). Mexifornia. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., & Lindseth, A. (2009). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses: Solving the funding-achievement puzzle in America’s public schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J. R. (2013). The end of exceptionalism in American education. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J., Hula, R. C., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. S. (1999). The color of school reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning wheels. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., Pierce, L. C., & Guthrie, J. W. (1997). Reinventing public education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (2009). The making of Americans. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. (2011). Corporatism, KIPP, and cultural eugenics. In P. E. Kovacs (Ed.), The gates foundation and the future of U.S. “public schools”. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W. G., & Brent, D. M. (2013). Thinking about the presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaestle, C. F. (2007). Federal education policy and the changing national polity for education, 1957–2007. In C. F. Kaestle & A. E. Lodewick (Eds.), To educate a nation (pp. 17–40). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. (2010). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, M. W. (1995). Who’s in charge? Federal, state, and local control. In D. Ravitch & M. A. Vinovskis (Eds.), Learning from the past (pp. 25–56). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2010). Obama defends race to top. Education Week, July 29. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/07/29/37obama.h29.html

  • Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2007). Public policy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1978). Defending the national interest. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with Ed. schools. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledbetter, J. (2011). Unwarranted influence: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the military-industrial complex. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, N. (2012). Smarter budgets, smarter schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review No. 19, pp. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1979). The end of liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J. (1985). The personal president. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddaus, J., & Mirochnik, D. A. (1992). Town tuitioning in main: Parental choice of secondary schools in rural communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 8(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna, P. (2011). Collision course: Federal education policy meets state and local realities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R. (2003). Ignoring advice: The disillusionment of public school politics. Education Next, 4(1), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., & McShane, M. (2012). President Obama and education reform: The personal and the political. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., Milliman, S. R., Hess, F. M., & Gresham, A. W. (Eds.). (2001). School choice in the real world: Lessons from Arizona charter schools. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., & Ritter, G. (2014). Why KIPP is not corporate: KIPP and social justice. Journal of School Choice., 8(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., & van Raemdonck, D. C. (2011). The educational industrial complex: A critique of a concept. Journal of School Choice, 5(3), 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., & van Raemdonck, D. C. (2015). Letting education and religion overlap: Why expanding vouchers to include parochial schools is a good idea. Wall Street Journal, 9. Retrieved January 8, 2015, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/robert-maranto-and-dirk-c-van-raemdonck-letting-education-and-religion-overlap-1420761949

  • Maranto, R., van Raemdonck, D. C., & Vasile, A. (forthcoming). The educational industrial complex in comparative perspective. International Journal of Education Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (2009). Work hard. Be nice: How two inspired teachers created the most promising schools in America. Chapel Hill: Algonquin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (1981). The graves of academe. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. M. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, T. (2012). Statesmanship, character and leadership in America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2005). What does it mean to educate the whole child. Educational Leadership, 63(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2007). Our kids, our future. Speech in Manchester, New Hampshire, November 20. http://www.barackobama.com/2007/11/20/remarks_of_senator_barack_obama_34.php

  • Ong-Dean, C. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege, and special education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Treinventing government. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. E. (1994). The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. E. (2010). Saving schools: From Horace Mann to virtual learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P. E., Rave, B., & Wong, K. (1986). When federalism works. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of battles over school reform. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D., & Finn, C. E., Jr. (1987). What do our 17-year-olds know? New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, W. (1996). Black Mayors and school politics. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieselbach, L. N. (1977). Congressional reform in the 70s. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, G. W., Maranto, R., & Buck, S. (2009). Harnessing private incentives in public education. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(3), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. N. (1993). The hollow hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousmaniere, K. (2013). The principal’s office. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roza, M. (2010). Educational economics: Where do school funds go? Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. Chicago: Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D., & Robert, M. (1998). The politics of civil service reform. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1997). The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turque, B., & Glod, M. (2009). Stimulus to help retool education, Duncan Says. Washington Post, March 5. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/04/AR2009030403523.html

  • Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. (2010). Bad students, not bad schools. Piscataway: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. R. (2010). Overcoming the political barriers to change. In F. M. Hess & E. Osberg (Eds.), Stretching the school dollar (pp. 263–288). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmire, R. (2011). The bee eater. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2005). Cheating our kids. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & DiIulio, J. J. (2006). American government (9th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, M. (2012). Teachers matter. New York: Roman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooster, M. M. (1993). Angry classrooms, vacant minds. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maranto, R., McShane, M.Q., Rhinesmith, E. (2016). The Birth of the Education President: From Local Control to Common Core. In: Education Reform in the Obama Era. Education Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58212-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58212-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58211-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58212-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics