Abstract
The use of immigration detention is on the rise globally. More than one million people pass through immigration detention centres in the USA, Canada, Australia, and Europe each year. This chapter briefly outlines the ways in which refugees are viewed in popular discourse, either as idealised passive victims or as conniving, cheating threats to national security. This dichotomy underpins public support for immigration detention and works against refugees establishing a political voice. The chapter briefly outlines legal positivist, essentialist and constructivist approaches to human rights and analyses refugees’ use of a human rights language to articulate their claims. Finally, it locates immigration detention as a key site in power struggles between refugees and sovereign states.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aas, K. F. (2007). Analysing a world in motion. Global flows meet “criminology of the other”. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 283–303.
ACLU. (n.d.). Sexual abuse in immigration detention facilities. Sexual abuse complaints since 2007 from ACLU Freedom of Information Act documents. ACLU. Retrieved February 8, 2016, from https://www.aclu.org (home page).
Arendt, H. (1976). The origins of totalitarianism. Orlando: Harcourt Publishing.
BBC. (2016). Migrant crisis: Migration to Europe explained in graphics. BBC Online, January 28. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911
Elliot, E., & Gunasekera, H. (2016). The health and well-being of children in immigration detention. Report to the Australian Human Rights Commission. Monitoring Visit to Wickham Point Detention Centre, Darwin, NT. October 16th–18th 2015. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.
Foucault, M. (1997). Society must be defended. Lectures at the College de France 1975–76 (D. Macey, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.
Gibney, M. (2004). The ethics and politics of asylum. Liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin-Gill, G. (1986). International law and the detention of refugees and asylum seekers. International Migration Review, 20(2), 193–219.
Grewcock, M. (2009). Border crimes: Australia’s war on illicit migrants. Sydney: Sydney Institute of Criminology Press.
Haddad, E. (2008). The refugee in international society. Between sovereigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hailbronner, K. (2007). Detention of asylum seekers. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9(2), 150–172.
Hamilton, K. R. (2011). Immigrant detention centers in the United States and international human rights. Berkley La Raza Law Journal, 1(4), 93–132.
Harrell-Bond, B. (1999). The experience of refugees as recipients of aid. In A. Ager (Ed.), Refugees: Perspectives on the experience of forced migration. London: Continuum.
Harrell-Bond, B., & Voutira, E. (1992). Anthropology and the study of refugees. Anthropology Today, 8(4), 6–10.
Kalhan, A. (2010). Rethinking immigration detention. Columbia Law Review, 110, 42–58.
Maley, W. (2003). Asylum-seekers in Australia’s international relations. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 57(1), 187–202.
Malkki, L. H. (1996). Speechless emissaries: Refugees, humanitarianism, and dehistoricization. Cultural Anthropology, 11(3), 377–404.
Malloch, M., & Stanley, S. (2005). The detention of asylum seekers in the UK. Representing risk, managing the dangerous. Punishment & Society, 7(1), 53–71.
Marfleet, P. (2006). Refugees in a global era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nethery, A., Rafferty-Brown, B., & Taylor, S. (2012). Exporting detention: Australia funded immigration detention in Indonesia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(1), 88–109.
Nethery, A., & Silverman, S. (Eds.) (2015). Immigration detention. The migration of a policy and its human impact. Abingdon: Routledge.
Parekh, S. (2007). Resisting “dull and torpid” assent: Returning to the debate over the foundations of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(3), 754–778.
Parekh, S. (2008). Conscience, morality and judgement: An inquiry into the subjective basis of human rights. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 34(1–2), 177–195.
Philo, G., Briant, E., & Donald, P. (2013). The role of the press in the war on asylum. Race & Class, 55(2), 28–41.
Pickering, S. (2005). Refugees and state crime. Annandale: Federation Press.
Pugliese, J. (2007). The event-trauma of the carceral post-human. Social Semiotics, 17(1), 63–86.
Rajaram, P. M. (2002). Humanitarianism and representations of the refugee. Journal of Refugee Studies, 15(3), 247–264.
Robjant, K., Hassan, R., & Katona, C. (2009). Mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers: Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 306–312.
Sampson, R., & Mitchell, G. (2013). Global trends in immigration detention and alternatives. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 1(3), 97–121.
Shaw, S. (2016). Review into the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons. A report to the home office. London: UK Home Office.
Silverman, S., & Nethery, A. (2015). Introduction. In A. Nethery & S. Silverman (Eds.), Immigration detention. The migration of a policy and its human impact. Abingdon: Routledge.
Soguk, N. (1999). States and strangers. Refugees and displacements of statecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Steel, Z., & Silove, D. (2001). The mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers. Medical Journal of Australia, 175, 596–599.
Stevens, D. (2013). Asylum seekers, detention and the law: Morality in abeyance? In S. Juss (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to migration law, theory and policy. Farnham: Ashgate.
Story, B. (2005). Politics as usual: The criminalisation of asylum seekers in the United States. Refugee Studies Centre, Working Paper Series, 26. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Tazreiter, C. (2006). Security and the use of state violence. Justifications and limits in the treatment of asylum seekers. In J. Madeira & I. Gozaydin (Eds.), Evil, law and the state. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (1992). Handbook on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees. Document HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from http://www.unhcr.org/3d58e13b4.html
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2015). Global Trends 2014. Geneva: UNHCR. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from http://unhcr.org/556725e69.html
Wilsher, D. (2012). Immigration detention. Law, history, politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfram Cox, J., & Minahan, S. (2004). Unravelling woomera: Lip sewing, morphology and dystopia. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 292–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fiske, L. (2016). Introduction. In: Human Rights, Refugee Protest and Immigration Detention. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58096-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58096-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58095-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58096-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)