Abstract
Tofighian summarizes his ‘mutual scaffolding’ method and how he applies it to interpret the interdependent relationship between myth and philosophy in the Meno, Protagoras, Phaedo, Phaedrus, and the Atlantis myth. He reiterates the values of his approach by explaining the significance of addressing and harmonizing sections on (1) theme introduction, setting, and narrative; (2) myth analysis; (3) the philosophical arguments; (4) mutual scaffolding; (5) plot structure; and (6) character selection. Tofighian’s interdisciplinary approach examines the opening scenes, mise-en-scène, narrative voice, literary and cultural themes, the introduction and structure of debates, and the characters who raise questions and create dilemmas. Tofighian asks the question: “Where does myth belong?” to provoke an interdisciplinary reading of myth in Plato and to develop an inclusive method for understanding different sacred narratives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Schilbrack (2002a, 2004a).
- 2.
Feldman and Richardson (1972) pp. 297–527.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Nakata et al. (1998, 2012); Bishop (2005) pp. 110–112; Smith (1999); Arashiro and Barahona (2015); Connell (2007); Yancy (2008); Alcoff and Caputo (2011); Alcoff and Mendieta (2000); Weinbaum (2004). Consider the early views of myth in the context of colonialism by Banier (Feldman and Richardson [1972] pp. 86–87).
- 10.
- 11.
For sociofunctionalist views of myth, see Doty (1986) pp. 44–45.
- 12.
Brisson (1998) p. 22.
- 13.
See Veyne (1988) regarding the ambiguous distinctions between belief and disbelief in myth and legend in ancient Greece.
- 14.
Morgan (2000) p. 157.
- 15.
Morgan (2000) p. 157.
- 16.
Morgan (2000) p. 16.
Bibliography
Secondary Texts
Alcoff, L.M. and Mendieta, E. (eds.). (2000). Thinking from the Underside of History: Enrique Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield.
Alcoff, L.M. and Caputo, J.D. (eds.). (2011). Feminism, Sexuality, and the Return of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Anderson, P.S. (2002). ‘Myth and Feminist Philosophy’ in Thinking Through Myths – Philosophical Perspectives. K. Schilbrack (ed.) London: Routledge, 101–122.
Anderson, D.G. (2014). ‘Cultures of Reciprocity and Cultures of Control in the Circumpolar North’. Journal of Northern Studies. 9 (2): 11–27.
Arashiro, Z. and Barahona, M. (eds.). (2015). Women in Academia Crossing North–south Borders. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Bishop, R. (2005). ‘Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Kaupapa Māori approach to creating knowledge’, in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 109–138). N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bremmer, J.N. (2010). The Greek Gods in the Twentieth Century, in J.N. Bremmer and A. Erskine (eds.). The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Bremmer, J.N. (2011). ‘A Brief History of the Study of Greek Mythology’, in A Companion to Greek Mythology. K. Dowden and N. Livingstone (eds.) Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 527–547.
Bremmer J.N. (2012) ‘Introduction: The Greek Gods in the Twentieth Century’ J.N.
Brisson, L. (1998). Plato the Myth Maker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buck-Morrs, S. (Summer 2000). ‘Hegel and Haiti’, Critical Inquiry 26 (4): 821–865.
Buxton, R. (ed.). (1999). From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, D., Glanville, E.G., Hasan, W. and Kramer-Hamstra, A. (eds.). (2012a). Countering Displacements: The Creativity and Resilience of Indigenous and Refugee-ed Peoples. Alberta: The University of Alberta Press.
Connell, R. (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Sciences. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Cruikshank, J. (1998). The Social Life of Stories. Narrative and Knowledge in Northern Canada. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press and Vancouver, UBC Pres.
Csapo, E. (2005). Theories of Mythology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. and Smith, L.T. (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. London: Sage Publications.
de Sousa Santos, B. (ed.). (2007). Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for a Decent Life. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Detienne, M. (1986). The Creation of Mythology. M. Cook (trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Detienne, M. (2009). Les grecs et nous. Paris: Perrin.
Doty, W. (1986). Mythography. Alabama: University Alabama Press.
Dundes. A. (ed.). (1984). Sacred Narrative. Readings in the Theory of Myth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Emeagwali, G. and Sefa Dei, G.J. (eds.). (2014). African Indigenous Knowledge and the Disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Feldman, B. and Richardson, R.D. (1972). The Rise of Modern Mythology: 1680–1860. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Grounds, R.A., Tinker, G.E. and Wilkins, D.E. (eds). (2003). Native Voices: American Indian Identity and Resistance. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Hawes, G. (2014). Rationalizing Myth in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hendry, J. and Fitznor, L. (eds.). (2012). Anthropologists, Indigenous Scholars and the Research Endevour: Seeking Bridges Toward Mutual Respect. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, S.N. (2012). Creole Indigeneity: Between Myth and Nation in the Caribbean. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jean-Marie, V. (2013). ‘Kant and Trouillot on the Unthinkability of the Haitian Revolution’, Souls 15 (3): 241–257.
Lincoln, B. (1999). Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maaka, R.C.A. and Anderson, C. (eds.). (2006). The Indigenous Experience: Global Perspectives. Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Martin, K.L. (2003). ‘Ways of Knowing, Ways of Being and Ways of Doing: a theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous re-search and Indigenist research’, in ‘Voicing Dissent’ New Talents 21C: Next Generation Australian Studies. K. McWilliam, P. Stephenson and G. Thomspon (eds.). Journal of Australian Studies, No. 76: 203–214.
Morgan, K.A. (2000). Myth and Philosophy from the pre-Socratics to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the Savages – Savaging the Disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
Nakata, M. (1998). ‘Anthropological Texts and Indigenous Standpoints’, in Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 3–12.
Nakata, M. (2004). ‘Ongoing Conversations about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Agendas and Directions’, in Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, The 33: 1–6.
Park, P.K.J. (2013). Africa, Asia, and the Philosophy of History: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830. Albany: SUNY Press.
Rigney, L. (2006). ‘Indigenist Research and Aboriginal Australia’, in Indigenist Peoples’ Wisdom and Power: Affirming Our Knowledge Through Narratives.’ J.E. Kunnie and N.I. Goduka (eds.). Hampshire: Ashgate, 32–50.
Segal, R.A. (1999). Theorizing About Myth. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Segal, R.A. (2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). ‘Introduction: What is indigenous knowledge and why should we study it?’ in What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy (pp. 3–57). L. M. Semali, ed. & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.) New York: Falmer.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
Snell, B. (1953). The Discovery of the Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vernant, J. (1974). Mythe et Société en Grèce ancienne. Paris: François Maspero.
Veyne, P. (1988). Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination. Trans. by P. Wissing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weinbaum, A.E. (2004). Wayward Reproductions: Genealogies of Race and Nation in Transatlantic Modern Thought. Durham: Duke University Press.
Yancy, G. (2008). Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race. Forward by L. Alcoff. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tofighian, O. (2016). Where Does Myth Belong?. In: Myth and Philosophy in Platonic Dialogues. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58044-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58043-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58044-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)