Advertisement

Organizational Leadership Development in Malaysia: Current Practices, Challenges and Future Potentials

  • Victoria Jonathan
  • Hana Hamidi
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets book series (PSIEM)

Abstract

As an emerging economy, Malaysia depends not only on foreign investment, good infrastructure and technology but also on the talent and leadership abilities of its future leaders. In the Malaysian context, the importance of leadership is reflected in the government’s support for human capital development and developing capable leaders through investment in leadership development initiatives. This chapter presents some of the leadership development practices, challenges and potentials in the public and private sectors in Malaysia. It includes an overview of research on organizational leadership in Malaysia; a description of current leadership development practices, programs and systems in the public and private sectors, including a description of a national leadership development initiative; a look at some challenges to leadership development; and implications for research and practice for sustainable leadership development in the country.

Keywords

Private Sector Transformational Leadership Leadership Style Leadership Behavior Human Resource Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdul Wahat, N. W., Krauss, S. E., & Othman, J. (2013). Leadership development through workplace learning in Malaysian organizations. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 298–306.Google Scholar
  2. Abdullah, A. (1994). Leading and motivating the Malaysian workforce. Malaysian Management Review, 29, 24–41.Google Scholar
  3. AEON Corporation Malaysia Berhad. (2015). [website]. Retrieved from http://www.aeonretail.com.my/corporate/
  4. Ahmad, K. (2001). Corporate leadership and workforce motivation in Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 11(1), 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. AirAsia X Berhad. (2015). 2014 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://airasiax.listedcompany.com/misc/ar/ar2014.pdf
  6. Amagoh, F. (2009). Leadership development and leadership effectiveness. Management Decision, 47(6), 989–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, Z. A., & Aafaqi, R. (2004). Organizational leadership in the Malaysian context. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Leading in high growth Asia: Managing relationships for teamwork and change (pp. 109–138). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Retrieved from http://people.uleth.ca/~mahfooz.ansari/2004%20Book%20Chapter%205-Leading%20in%20High%20Growth%20Asia.pdf
  8. Asian Aviation Centre of Excellence (AACE) Malaysia. (2015). [website]. Retrieved from http://2fd.95d.myftpupload.com/
  9. Bajunid, I. A. (1999). Megashifts in the training of educational administrators/managers: Strategic plans for the realization of Malaysia’s 2020. In I. A. Bajunid, A. H. Jantan, S. P. S. Ali, & B. A. Ramiah (Eds.), Looking at the practices of educational management and administration. Genting Highlands, Malaysia: Institut Aminuddin Baki.Google Scholar
  10. Bajunid, I. A. (2008). The development of educational leaders in Malaysia: The creation of a professional community. In D. Johnson & R. Maclean (Eds.), Teaching: Professionalization, development and leadership (pp. 215–232). Berlin: Springer Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2015). Quarterly Bulletin First Quarter 2015. Retrieved from http://www.bnm.gov.my/files/publication/qb/2015/Q1/1Q2015_fullbook_en.pdf
  13. Boatman, J., Wellins, R. S., & Wong, A. (2011). Malaysia highlights: Global Leadership Forecast 2011. The Talent Management Expert. Retrieved from https://www.ddiworld.com/DDIWorld/media/trend-research/globalleadershipforecast2011_malaysiahighlights_tr_ddi.pdf
  14. Economic Planning Unit. (2010). Tenth Malaysia Plan (2011–2015). Retrieved from http://onlineapps.epu.gov.my/rmke10/rmke10_english.html
  15. Economic Transformation Program. (2013). Overview of ETP. Retrieved from http://etp.pemandugov.my/About_ETP-@Overview_of_ETP.aspx
  16. Gharibvand, S., Mazumder, M. N. H., Mohiuddin, M., & Su, Z. (2013). Leadership style and employee job satisfaction: Evidence from Malaysian semiconductor industry. Transnational Corporations Review, 5(2), 93–103.Google Scholar
  17. Government Transformation Program. (2011). GTP overview. Retrieved from http://www.pemandu.gov.my/gtp/
  18. Gurdjian, P., Halbeisen, T., & Lane, K. (2014). Why leadership development programs fail? McKinley Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/leading_in_the_21st_century/why_leadership-development_programs_fail
  19. Hegardt Ullberg, G., & Kundla, T. (2014). The development of next generation leadership in Malaysia. From early identification to executive maturity: The views of top executives and high potential leaders at 11 multinational corporations. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. INTAN. (2015). [website]. Retrieved December 1, 2015, from http://www.intanbk.intan.my/iportal/index.php/ms/
  22. Jauhar, J., & Mohd Yusoff, Y. (2011). Brain drain: Propensity to leave by Malaysian professionals. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(2), 119–122.Google Scholar
  23. Jogulu, U. D. (2010). Culturally-linked leadership styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(8), 705–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy, J., & Mansor, N. (2000). Malaysian culture and the leadership of organizations: A GLOBE study. Malaysian Management Review, 35(2), 44–53.Google Scholar
  25. Kennedy, J. C. (2002). Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Konting, M. M. (2012). Leadership development for sustainability of E-learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: The Education Schools Project.Google Scholar
  28. Lim, L. (2001). Work-related values of Malays and Chinese Malaysians. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., De Run, E. C., & Ling, V. M. (2009). New leadership, leader-member exchange and commitment to change: The case of higher education in Malaysia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 41, 574–580.Google Scholar
  30. Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., Min, H. W., & Songan, P. (2010). The relationship between leadership styles and organizational commitment in Malaysia: Role of leader-member exchange. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1–2), 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malaysia. (2004). The Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Government of Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.my/en/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=27f956da-1243-4fb1-86c9-3c48fe799566&groupId=283545
  32. Malaysia. (2006). Education development master plan 2006–2010. Putrajaya: Government of Malaysia.Google Scholar
  33. McCall, M. W. (2004). Leadership development through experience. Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinsey and Company. (2012). Women matter: An Asian perspective. Harnessing female talent to raise corporate performance. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinseyoffices/japan/pdf/women_matter_an_asian_perspective.ashx
  35. National Economic Advisory Council. (2010). New economic model for Malaysia part 1: Strategic policy directions. Putrajaya: National Economic Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  36. Ng, C., & Leng, C. H. (1996). Women in Malaysia: Present struggles and future directions. Asian Journal of Womens Studies, 2, 192. Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.ezp1.lib.umn.edu/docview/197681530?accountid=14586
  37. OECD. (2013). Structural policy country notes: Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dev/asia-pacific/Malaysia.pdf
  38. Rahman, R. H. (2012). Malaysian firms’ role in retaining engineers. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 23(4), 57–70. Retrieved from http://elr.sagepub.com.ezp3.lib.umn.edu/content/23/4/57.full.pdf
  39. Saufi, R. A., Wafa, S. A., & Hamzah, M. Y. Z. (2002). Leadership style preferences of Malaysian managers. Malaysian Management Review, 37(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  40. Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2008). One nation, three cultures: Exploring dimensions that relate to leadership in Malaysia. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(8), 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Talent Corporation Malaysia. (2015). [website]. Retrieved from https://www.talentcorp.com.my/home/making-a-difference/
  42. Talent Corporation Malaysia. (2016). Senior female talent key to driving innovation, growth and advancement of women in the workforce. Retrieved from https://www.talentcorp.com.my/media-centre/press-office/press-releases-and-statement/senior-female-talent-key-to-driving-innovation-growth-and-advancement-of-women-in-the-workforce
  43. Taormina, R., & Selvarajah, C. (2005). Perceptions of leadership excellence in ASEAN nations. Leadership, 1(3), 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winters, L. A., Commander, S., & Kangasniemi, M. (2004). The brain drain: Curse or boon? A survey of the literature. In R. Baldwin & L. A. Winters (Eds.), Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics. National bureau of economic research conference report (pp. 235–272). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria Jonathan
    • 1
  • Hana Hamidi
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiti Malaysia SarawakKota SamarahanMalaysia

Personalised recommendations