Advertisement

Understanding of Business Ethics by Leaders Based in Singapore: A Restorative Justice Perspective

  • Razwana Begum Bt Abdul Rahim
Chapter

Abstract

The debate between ethical business practices and leadership has been growing and gaining momentum since the global financial crisis in 2008. Though various steps and measures were created to plug the gaps in the area of compliance and corporate governance, there is also an increasing demand for leaders to focus on business ethics. Ethics in business has become a critical topic for business leaders. Similarly, business leaders in Singapore emphasize on business ethics. In Singapore, being a small state relying mainly on commercial organizations for growth and economic development, the government has put in place various measures to ensure transparency and business continuity. These rules and regulations are often translated by the leader. To understand the leaders’ perception of ethical business principles and practices, a research study was carried out in Singapore in 2010 and 2011 with five business leaders. Analysis supports the view that leaders in commercial organizations based in Singapore perceive business ethics as important. Their understanding of business ethics, however, reflected a combination of the individual leaders’ ethical values and the government’s regulatory practices. The research study also indicated the potential of restorative justice in commercial organizations based in Singapore. The leaders’ management style in ensuring conformance by their employees to business ethics highlighted the principles, values and practices of restorative justice.

Keywords

Singapore Business ethics Restorative justice Leadership Compliance 

References

  1. Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2010). An overview of the crisis: Causes, consequences and solutions. International Review of Finance, 10(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, I., & J. Braithwaite (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birsch, D., & Fielder, J. (1994). The Ford Pinto case: A study in applied ethics, business, and technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 25, 1–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, 46(l), 143–153.Google Scholar
  10. Chongvilaivan, A. (2010). The Singapore economy: An econometric perspective. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(3), 332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, James C., & Porras, Jerry I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. De George, R. T. (1995). Business ethics (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. De Hoogh, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dignan, J. (2005). Understanding victims and restorative justice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Duska, R. F. (2000). Business ethics: Oxymoron or good business? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duska, R. F. (2003). Seventy-five years of ethics. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 57(5), 20–22.Google Scholar
  18. Floyd, L. A., Xu, F., Atkins, R., & Caldwell, C. (2013). Ethical outcomes and business ethics: Toward improving business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 753–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodstein, J., & Aquino, K. (2010). And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 624–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodstein, J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2010). Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jerry, M. (2010). BP squad’ assembles to probe oil spill: Criminal inquiry to focus on three firms and their ties to regulators. Washington Post, United States.Google Scholar
  22. John, L. (1991). Bhopal: An essay on moral responsibility and civic virtue. Journal of Social Philosophy, 22(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, J. (1997). Corporate soulcraft in the age of brutal markets. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kensil, S., & Margraf, K. (2012). The advantage of failing first: Bear Stearns v. Lehman brothers. Journal of Applied Finance, 22(2), 60–76.Google Scholar
  25. Kidder, D. L. (2007). Restorative justice: Not ‘rights’, but the right way to heal relationships at work. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1), 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurzynski, M. (2012). Peter Drucker: Modern day Aristotle for the business community. Journal of Management History, 18(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsen, G., & Lawson, R. (2013). Consumer rights: An assessment of justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2001). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Lang, W., & Jagtiani, J. (2010). The mortgage and financial crises: The role of credit risk management and corporate governance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 38(2), 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Livesey, S. M. (2002). Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to ExxonMobil’s corporate public discourse. The Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madden, N., & Jian, Y. (2010). U.S. ‘overreaction’ stirs empathy for Toyota at home. Advertising Age, 81(9), 1–21.Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, T (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  33. May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2014). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mika, H., & Zehr, H. (2003). A restorative framework for community justice practice. In K. McEvoy & T. Newburn (Eds.), Criminology, conflict resolution and restorative justice (pp. 135–152). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, R. A. (2011). Entrepreneurship, law and the art of business ethics. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 8(5), 103–111.Google Scholar
  36. Nielsen, V. L., & Parker, C. (2009). Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement. Regulation & Governance, 3(4), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park, Y. (2009). The role of financial innovations in the current global financial crisis. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(2), 123–144.Google Scholar
  38. Parker, C. (2002). The open corporation: Effective self-regulation and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  40. Roach, K. (2000). Changing punishment at the turn of the century: Restorative justice on the rise. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 249–280.Google Scholar
  41. Roche, D. (2006). Dimensions of restorative justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rishi, M., & Singh, A. (2011). Corporate governance and international best practices: The case of Satyam. Journal of Services Research, 11(1), 121–122.Google Scholar
  43. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, M. U. (2006). Moral repair. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Winkler, D. (2010). India’s Satyam accounting scandal- University of IOWA. Center for International Finance and Development (Online).Google Scholar
  46. Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Bank Group. (2008). Global financial crisis, responding today, securing tomorrow. Background Paper prepared by the World Bank Group G20 Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy, Washington, DC, November 15.Google Scholar
  48. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. United States: Good Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations