Abstract
In this chapter, we provide background information related to India, Mexico, and Tanzania and we describe our research approach to examining teacher distribution in these countries. We first describe levels of economic development and social inequality, which determine the resources available to employ teachers and the degree to which disadvantaged populations have access to these resources. We then describe each country’s geography, as the difficulties of living and teaching in remote rural areas with few amenities constrain education officials’ efforts to recruit and deploy teachers to these areas. This is followed by a discussion of relevant aspects of these education systems and key issues related to teacher deployment and distribution. To further set the stage for the subsequent analysis, we describe the methodology of our study, including our comparative approach and our data collection and analysis strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ASER Center (2013). Annual status of education report (rural). New Delhi, India: ASER Center.
Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 472–490.
Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]. (2015a). The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html
Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]. (2015b). The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html
Chudgar, A. (2013). Teacher labor force and teacher education in India: An analysis of a recent policy change and its potential implications. In M. Akiba (Ed.), Teacher reforms around the world: Implementations and outcomes (Vol. 19 & pp. 55–76). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Chudgar, A., Luschei, T. F., Creed, B., Chandra, M., Pippin, J., & Fagioli, L. P. (2013). Regional report Sub-Saharan Africa: Study of teachers for children marginalized by social origin, economic status, or location. Submitted to the United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. New York: UNICEF.
Desai, S., & Dubey, A. (2012). Caste in 21st century India: Competing narratives. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(11), 40–49.
Government of India. (2012). Secondary education: Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan. Retrieved June 2, 2012, from http://mhrd.gov.in/rashtriya_madhyamik_shiksha_abhiyan
Hardman, F., Ackers, J., Abrishamian, N., & O’Sullivan, M. (2011). Developing a systemic approach to teacher education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging lessons from Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 669–683.
Hardman, F., & Dachi, H. (2012). Final report: Evaluation of school-based INSET pilot programme. York, UK: Institute for Effective Education, University of York.
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación [INEE]. (2013). Panorama educativo de México: Indicadores del sistema educativo nacional. 2012: Educación Básica y Media Superior. Mexico City, Mexico: Insituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.
International Institute for Population Sciences [IIPS] (2010). District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007–08: India. Mumbai, India: IIPS.
Luschei, T. F. (2012b). The effectiveness and distribution of male primary teachers: Evidence from two Mexican states. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.12.001.
Luschei, T. F., & Chudgar, A. (2015). Background report for Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2015: Evolution of policies on teacher deployment to disadvantaged areas. Submitted to UNESCO. New York: UNESCO.
Luschei, T. F., Chudgar, A., Fagioli, L. P., & Pippin, J. (2013a). Regional report - Latin America: Study of teachers for children marginalized by social origin, economic status, or location. Submitted to the United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. New York: UNICEF.
Luschei, T. F., Chudgar, A., & Rew, J. W. (2013). Exploring differences in the distribution of teacher qualifications across Mexico and South Korea: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–38. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/DefaultFiles/SendFileToPublic.asp?ft=pdf&FilePath=c:\WebSites\www_tcrecord_org_documents\38_16964.pdf&fid=38_16964&aid=2&RID=16964&pf=Content.asp?ContentID=16964
Martínez Rizo, F. (2002). Nueva visita al país de la desigualdad. La distribución de la escolaridad en México, 1970–2000. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 7(16), 415–443.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mehta, A. C. (2012). Elementary education in India: Progress towards UEE, flash statistics DISE 2010–2011. New Delhi: National University of Educational Planning and Administration.
Mexico Censo de Poblacion y Vivienda. (2010). Resultados definitivos.
Mkumbo, K. A. (2012). Teachers’ commitment to, and experiences of, the teaching profession in Tanzania: Findings of focus group research. International Education Studies, 5(3), 222–227.
Mulkeen, A., & Chen, D. (2008). Teachers for rural schools: Experiences in Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Fourth). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Puryear, J. M., Santibañez, L., & Solano, A. (2011). Education in Mexico, a new vision for Mexico: Achieving prosperity for all. Washington, DC: The Centennial Group.
The Economist. (n.d.). An Indian summary: Which countries match the GDP and population of India’s states and territories?
Treviño, E. (2013). Learning inequality among indigenous students in Mexico. In B. Jensen & A. Sawyer (Eds.), Regarding education: Mexican-American schooling, immigration, and bi-national improvement (pp. 95–123). New York: Teachers College Press.
UNESCO. (2012). Youth and skills: Putting education to work. Education for all Global Monitoring Report 2012. Paris, France: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2015a). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015. Education For All 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. Paris, France: UNESCO.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics [UIS]. (2014). Data centre. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/DataCentre/Pages/BrowseEducation.aspx
UNICEF (2012). Panorama de la adolescencia indígena en México desde una perspectiva de derechos. Mexico, DF: UNICEF.
UWEZO Tanzania. (2013). Are our children learning? Annual learning assessment report 2012. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: UWEZO.
Vavrus, F. (2003). Desire and decline: Schooling amid crisis in Tanzania (Vol. 13). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.
Vavrus, F. (2005). Adjusting inequality: Education and structural adjustment policies inTanzania. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 174–201.
Woods, E. (2009). Progress towards EFA in Tanzania. Prospects, 38, 425–430.
World Bank. (2015). Country and lending groups. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups
Zhang, Y. (2006). Urban-rural literacy gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa: The roles of socioeconomic status and school quality. Comparative Education Review, 50(4), 581–602.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Luschei, T.F., Chudgar, A. (2017). Setting the Study Context: India, Mexico, and Tanzania. In: Teacher Distribution in Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57926-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57926-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57925-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57926-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)