Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To Educate and Entertain: Representations of Learning in the Australian Version of Who Do You Think You Are?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning on Screen

Abstract

This chapter investigates edutainment (the use of entertainment as pedagogical tool) based on a case study of Who Do You Think You Are?, a documentary series about genealogy in which celebrities go on a journey to retrace their family tree. Originally broadcast by the BBC, Who Do You Think You Are? (2004–) has been adapted in eighteen countries. The Australian version of the franchise (2008–), which is the focus of this chapter, is broadcast on the public service channel SBS, whose charter states that its principal function is “to provide multilingual and multicultural radio, television and digital media services that inform, educate and entertain all Australians” (SBS). According to its producers, one of the main purposes of Who Do You Think You Are? is to teach history by exploring a wide range of eras and events through the celebrities’ genealogical investigations. But to invite viewers to learn, the program uses entertainment techniques such as including celebrities, storytelling, and emotions, instead of relying on more traditional techniques used in formal classroom environments. The aim of this chapter is to explain how this edutainment model constructs a particular version of learning. In the text, representations of learning are crystallized around the intricate figure of the celebrity, who performs as his/her famous public self, his/her authentic private self, and as learner, researcher, detective, and pedagogical tool all at once. This chapter first explores the pedagogical relationship between the celebrity-learner on-screen and the implied viewer-learner watching the program to demonstrate that the celebrity functions both as image of the learner and as pedagogical tool. The second part focuses more specifically on the use of storytelling and on the representation of learning as a detective investigation. The last section shows how Who Do You Think You Are? engages with the notion of learning as a bodily and emotional process and how this representation of learning as physical and emotional is linked to what is taught and to the representation of teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., & Austin, T. (2000). From Antz to Titanic: Reinventing film analysis. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, A., & Schneider, F. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A. (1995). The history of broadcasting in the United Kingdom: Volume I: The birth of broadcasting. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., & Vorderer, P. (2006). Psychology of entertainment. Mahwah: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2003). Young people, media and personal relationships. Available from https://www.asa.org.uk/Resource~Centre/~/media/Files/ASA/Reports/ASA_Young_people_media_personal_relationships_Nov_2003.ashx. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.

  • Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex and the media: The facts of life? London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cold Case. (2003–2010). CBS

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, V. (2011, April 17). Jamie Oliver’s dream was a nightmare. The Guardian. [Online]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/17/victoria-coren-jamie-oliver-catherine-zeta-jones. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.

  • Ellcessor, E. (2012). Tweeting @feliciaday: Online social media, convergence, and subcultural stardom. Cinema Journal, 51, 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, K. 2011. May you live normally ever after! – Popular film as pedagogy: Youth, subjectivity & Australian cinema. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Charles Sturt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A., Cottle, S., Negrine, R., & Newbold, C. (1998). Mass communication research methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1999). Uses of television. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L. (1991). Using entertainment television to educate: A case study. The Journal of Popular Culture, 25(2), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamie’s Dream School. (2011). Channel 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. (2011). Entertaining ideas: Social issues in entertainment television. Media Culture Society, 33(6), 905–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. (2013). Entertainment-education for the media-saturated: Audience perspectives on social issues in entertainment programming. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimmt, C., Hartman, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Mahwah: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozloff, S. (1992). Narrative theory and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse, reassembled: Television and contemporary criticism (pp. 42–73). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, G. S. (1975). Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lury, K. (2005). Interpreting television. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, M. (2014). “People shouldn’t be forgotten”: Cold case’s pursuit of history's ghosts. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 42(3), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco, J. (2000). How to read a film: The world of movies, media, and multimedia: Language, history, theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, R. W. (2006). Sesame Street and the reform of children’s television. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntean, N., & Petersen, A. 2009. Celebrity Twitter: Strategies of intrusion and disclosure in the age of technoculture. M/C Journal [Online]. 12(5). Available from: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/194. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.

  • Nichols, B. (2001). Introduction to documentary (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G., & Noble, E. (1979). A study of teenagers’ uses and gratifications of the Happy Days shows. Media Information Australia, 11, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2014). An introduction to the special issue: Expanding the boundaries of entertainment research. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsemain, A. (2015). Crocodile tears? Authenticity in televisual pedagogy. M/C Journal [Online], 18(1). Available from: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/931. Accessed 8 Apr 2015.

  • Sarnoff, D. (1968). Looking ahead: The papers of David Sarnoff. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • SBS. (2013). Who do you think you are? episodes [Online]. Available from: http://www.sbs.com.au/shows/whodoyouthinkyouare/episodes/page/season/5. Accessed 29 Jan 2015.

  • SBS. Our charter [Online]. Available from: http://www.sbs.com.au/aboutus/corporate/index/id/25/h/SBS-Charter. Accessed 9 Sept 2015.

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A., Rogers, E. M., & Brown, W. J. (1993). Harnessing the potential of entertainment-education telenovelas. International Communication Gazette, 51(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2014). Celebrity in the ‘Twitterverse’: History, authenticity and the multiplicity of stardom. Situating the ‘newness’ of Twitter. Celebrity Studies, 5(3), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (1997). Television, AIDS and risk: A cultural studies approach to health communication. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulloch, J., & Moran, A. (1986). A country practice: ‘Quality soap’. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorderer, P. (2001). It’s all entertainment-sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences. Poetics, 29(4), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2004–). BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2008–). SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2013a, April 2). Series 5, episode 1, Adam Hills. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2013b, April 9). Series 5, episode 2, Asher Keddie. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2013c, April 23). Series 5, episode 4, Michael Caton. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2013d, May 14). Series 5, episode 7, Rove McManus. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are?. (2013e, May 21). Series 5, episode 8, John Howard. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Who Do You Think You Are? (2014, July 9). Series 6, episode 1, Andrew Denton. SBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, W. (2006). Involvement. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 199–213). Mahwah: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Arts and Media, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Ava Laure Parsemain

Authors
  1. Ava Laure Parsemain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ava Laure Parsemain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom

    Mark Readman

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parsemain, A.L. (2016). To Educate and Entertain: Representations of Learning in the Australian Version of Who Do You Think You Are? . In: Readman, M. (eds) Teaching and Learning on Screen. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57872-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation