Skip to main content

Inside the Elephant’s Graveyard: Revising Geoffrey Bullough’s Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shakespeare and Authority

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

Abstract

Discussion of Shakespeare’s ‘sources’ continues to be ubiquitous, despite the fact that the terms in which it takes place are acknowledged to be unsatisfactory. This chapter considers how questions of ‘source text’ and ‘authority’, in addition to practical questions concerning how Shakespeare read and what materials he had ready access to, are aligned with a more radical questioning of the nature of the ‘text’ itself, and this leads towards a radical revision of Geoffrey Bullough’s Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, that takes account of the palimpsestic nature of Shakespeare’s dramatic texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Barker, F. (1995). The tremulous private body: Essays on subjection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, F., & Hulme, P. (1985). Nymphs and reapers heavily vanish: The discursive con-texts of The Tempest. In J. Drakakis (Ed.), Alternative Shakespeares (pp. 194–208). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In Image, music, text (S. Heath, Ed. and Trans., pp. 142–148). London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1975). A map of misreading. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1989). Ruin the sacred truths: Poetry and belief from the Bible to the present. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, T. (1586). A Treatise of Melancholy. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, G. (1957–1975). Narrative and dramatic sources of Shakespeare. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, C. (2013). Shakespeare and classical antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. (1621). A treatise on melancholy. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, J. (2014). Shakespeare’s stage traffic: Imitation, borrowing and competition in Renaissance theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (D. F. Bouchard & S. Simon, Trans., pp. 113–138). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1997a). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree (C. Newman & C. Doubinsky, Trans.). Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1997b). Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, S. (2001). Shakespeare’s books: A dictionary of Shakespeare’s sources. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, J. (1987). Macbeth and source. In J. E. Howard & M. F. O’Connor (Eds.), Shakespeare reproduced: The text in history and ideology (pp. 242–264). New York and London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (1985). Shakespeare and the exorcists. In P. Parker & G. H. Hartman (Eds.), Shakespeare and the question of theory (pp. 163–186). New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in the Renaissance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. (1576). An interpretation of dreames. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojève, A. (2014). The notion of authority (A brief presentation) (F. Terré, Ed., H. Weslati, Trans.). London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1984). The revolution in poetic language (M. Waller, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levith, M. J. (2007). Shakespeare’s cues and prompts. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. J. (1998). Shakespearean intertextuality: Studies in selected sources and plays. Westport, CT and London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, J. (1997). Textual intercourse: Collaboration, authorship, and sexualities in Renaissance drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, K. (1957). Shakespeare’s sources: 1. comedies and tragedies. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttenham, G. (1589). The arte of English poesie. London: R. Field.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quint, D. (1983). Origin and originality in Renaissance literature. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, L. A. (1581). Seneca his tenne tragedies. London: T. Marsh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, L. A. (1927). Seneca his tenne tragedies (T. S. Eliot, Intro.). London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1598). The history of Henrie the Fourth: With the battell at Shrewburie, betweene the king and Lord Henry Percy, surnamed Henrie Hotspur of the North. With the humorous conceits of Sir Iohn Falstaffe. London: P. S[hort] for A. Wise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (1982). Hamlet (H. Jenkins, Ed.). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (2000). King Henry VI part 1 (E. Burns, Ed.). London: Arden Shakespeare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, W. (2006). Hamlet (A. Thompson & N. Taylor, Eds.). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Drakakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Drakakis, J. (2018). Inside the Elephant’s Graveyard: Revising Geoffrey Bullough’s Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare . In: Halsey, K., Vine, A. (eds) Shakespeare and Authority. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57853-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics