Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1748 Accesses

Abstract

For much of the last three decades, the world of business and economic development has been dominated by the Silicon Valley Paradigm. This paradigm stipulates that high-growth technology companies most likely emerge under the particular framework conditions that govern the business environment of Silicon Valley. These include, for example, the abundance of risk capital, a culture of risk taking, the availability of a deep pool of highly skilled talent and the presence of large communities of foreign-born graduates and entrepreneurs, in addition to strong university–industry links and other factors. Considering the rapid emergence in Silicon Valley of numerous high-growth, high-tech start-ups that have gone on to become globally dominant, it is easy to see why this region has come to dominate attention and perceptions about what is most important for start-up success. With a population of less than three million, Silicon Valley generates a GDP of around US$210 billion (or US$70,000 per capita), with 45 % of households claiming an income over US$100,000. On a per capita basis, Silicon Valley counts among the richest areas of the world—in the same league as countries like Norway and Singapore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Galbraith, Craig S. “High-technology location and development: the case of Orange County.” California Management Review (pre-1986) 28.000001 (1985): 98; or Felsenstein, Daniel. “High technology firms and metropolitan locational choice in Israel: a look at the determinants.” Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography (1996): 43–58.

  2. 2.

    For a good literature review see Lafuente, Esteban, Yancy Vaillant, and Christian Serarols. “Location decisions of knowledge-based entrepreneurs: Why some Catalan KISAs choose to be rural?” Technovation 30.11 (2010): 590–600.

  3. 3.

    For example, when measured using data from WEF Global Competitiveness Index 2013–2014 and the EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2013.

  4. 4.

    See an interview Marco Veremis in the Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/440ce4a6-ef3f-11e4-87dc-00144feab7de.html#axzz3eR2wQNtr

  5. 5.

    Serendipity was excluded as a condition as it was deemed too amorphous in nature and thus difficult for interviewees to establish whether it was in short or plentiful supply.

References

  • Bolton, R. 2002. Place surplus, exit, voice, and loyalty. In Regional policies and comparative advantage, ed. B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, and R. Stough. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, David. 2010. Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard, and James March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Michael S., and Olav Sorenson. 2012. Home sweet home: Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science 58(6): 1059–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, O., P. Guimaraes, and D. Woodward. 2002. Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics 52: 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard. 2002. Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 2(1): 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard. 2004. The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (Paperback Ed.). New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Craig S. 1985. High-technology location and development: The case of Orange County. California Management Review 28(1): 98 (pre-1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente, Esteban, Yancy Vaillant, and Christian Serarols. 2010. Location decisions of knowledge-based entrepreneurs: Why some Catalan KISAs choose to be rural? Technovation 30(11): 590–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E., and J.N. Morgan. 1962. Location decisions of manufacturers. American Economic Review 52: 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1996. What is strategy? Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao. 1993. The role of core competencies in the corporation. Research Technology Management 36: 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puhvel, J. 1984. The origin of Etruscan Tusna (‘Swan’). The American Journal of Philology 105: 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., and S.B. White. 1997. The entrepreneurial process. New London: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M., and Judith K. Larsen. 1984. Silicon valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Annalee. 1985. Silicon valley and route 128: Regional prototypes or historic exceptions? In High technology, space and society, ed. M. Castells. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Annalee. 1983. The genesis of Silicon Valley. Built Environment 9: 7–17 (1978-).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senor, Dan, and Saul Singer. 2011. Start-up nation: The story of Israel’s economic miracle. New York: Random House LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Christopher. 2013. Startup rising. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. 2007. Why butterflies don’t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography 83(1): 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, David J., et al. 1987. The performance of small firms: Profits, jobs and failures. Urbana-Champaign’s academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Global Competitiveness Index 2013–14, World Economic Forum, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The pragmatic theory of explanation. http://www.fitelson.org/290/vanfraassen_pte.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)>

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahroum, S. (2016). Introduction. In: Black Swan Start-ups. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57727-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics