Skip to main content

Organizational Identity and International Firm Growth: Some Theoretical Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between Organizational Identity (OI) and international firm growth. By linking the OI concept to the literature on international business it shows that the identity of an organization offers important insights into the preparedness of a firm to internationalize. Moreover, the paper demonstrates that OI as a concept has the potential to align rational choice and behavioral paradigms to explain corporate internationalization.

JEL Codes: M14, M16, L20

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paradigm, in addition to O-advantages, also investigates the role of location specific (l-) and internalization (I-) advantages to explain foreign direct investment, i.e. one particular form of internationalization, next to a number of important non-equity forms of internationalization such as exports, licensing, or franchising.

  2. 2.

    Only Lowe et al. (2012) tried to introduce a comparative dimension in their study, however the insights gained concentrated on Tesco’s market entry in the US.

References

  • Aharoni, Y. 1966. The foreign investment decision process, vol. 403. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., and D.A. Whetten. 1985. Organizational identity. In Research in organizational behavior, vol. 7, ed. L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw, 263–295. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott. 2002. Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the “appropriate individual”. Journal of Management Studies 39(5): 619–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E., and F.A. Mael. 1996. Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In Advances in strategic management, vol. 13, ed. J.A.C. Baum and J.E. Dutton, 19–64. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. M., and S. A. Greyser. 2002. Managing the multiple identities of the corporation, Working paper series. Bradford: Bradford University, School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1999. Managing across borders: The transnational solution, vol. 2. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyacigiller, N., S. Beechler, S. Taylor, and O. Levy. 2004. The crucial yet elusive global mindset. In The Blackwell handbook of global management. A guide to managing complexity, ed. H.W. Lane, M.L. Maznevski, M.E. Mendenhall, and J. McNett, 81–93. Malden/Oxford/Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.C., and J.I. Porras. 2005. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M., and J.G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhalla, R. 2007. The construction of organizational identity: Key contributing external and intra-organizational factors. Corporate Reputation Review 10(4): 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörrenbächer, C., and M. Geppert. 2017, forthcoming (eds.). Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: A post-millennium perspective, Series. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Emerald, Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In The international allocation of economic activity, ed. B. Ohlin, P.O. Hesselborn, and P.M. Wijkman, 395–418. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies 19(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H., and S.M. Lundan. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 25(4): 573–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J.E., and J.M. Dukerich. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Review 34(3): 517–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L., and S. Miller. 2001. Opening the black box: Multinationals and the costs of doing business Abroad. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empson, L. 2004. Organizational identity change: Managerial regulation and member identification in an accounting firm acquisition. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(8): 759–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresenius. 2015. Fresenius career. Available from https://karriere.fresenius.de/en/professionals. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.

  • Gaffney, N., D. Cooper, B. Kedia, and J. Clampit. 2014. Institutional transitions, global mindset, and EMNE internationalization. European Management Journal 32(3): 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., and D.E. Westney (eds.). 1993. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. New. York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., D.E. Westney (eds.). 2005. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., and J.B. Thomas. 1996. Identity, image and issue interpretation: Sense-making during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(3): 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., M. Schultz, and K.G. Corley. 2000. Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E.M. 1978. Transatlantic investment by multinational firms: A rivalistic phenomenon? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1(1): 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Knowledge and Strategy 33(3): 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 2002. Cultivating a global mindset. Academy of Management Executive 16(1): 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 2002. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations 55(8): 989–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz (eds.). 2004. Organizational identity: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. 1960/1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., M. Teagarden, and D. Bowen. 2010. Managing yourself: Making it overseas. Harvard Business Review 88: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannet, J.-P. 2000. Managing with a global mindset. London: Financial Times, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., and J.-E. Vahlne. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitments. Journal of International Business Studies 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., and J.E. Vahlne. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies 40(9): 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knickerbocker, F.T. 1973. Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. The International Executive 15(2): 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G.A., and S.T. Cavusgil. 2004. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies 35(2): 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., and K. Roth. 2003. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro–macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, Ø. 2006. The internationalization of small firms: A cognitive perspective. Doctoral thesis, GRIN Publishing GmbH, Munich. Available from http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/163495/the-internationalization-of-small-firms-a-cognitive-perspective. Accessed 8 Feb 2015.

  • Lappe, C., and C. Dörrenbächer. 2016. Organizational identity, global mindset and the internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises. In Organizational identity and firm growth: Properties of growth, contextual identities and micro-level processes, ed. C. Dörrenbächer, M. Tomenendal, and S. Stanske, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerpold, L. 2007. An identity-based internationalization process. The BP and Statoil alliance. In Organizational identity in practice, ed. L. Lerpold, D. Ravasi, J. van Rekom, and G. Soenen, 121–134. London/New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, O., S. Beechler, S. Taylor, and N.A. Boyacigiller. 2007. What we talk about when we talk about “global mindset”: Managerial cognition in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 38(2): 231–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, M., G. George, and O. Alexy. 2012. Organizational identity and capability development in internationalization: Transference, splicing and enhanced imitation in Tesco’s US market entry. Journal of Economic Geography 12(5): 1012–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundan, S.M. 2010. What are ownership advantages? Multinational Business Review 18(2): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N. 2010. Identity regulation: Towards employee control? International Journal of Organizational Analysis 18(1): 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummela, N., S. Saarenketo, and K. Puumalainen. 2004. A global mindset—a prerequisite for a successful internationalization. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 21(1): 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. 1990. The borderless world. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, H. 2000. Creating a global mindset. Thunderbird International Business Review 42(2): 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H.V. 1969. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business 4(1): 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulfelt, F., K. Christiansen, and I.S. Smith. 2013. Organizational identity change through international expansion: The case of a Scandinavian consulting firm’s encounter with India. In Exploring the professional identity of management consultants, ed. A.F. Buoni, L. de Caluwé, and A. Stollelenburg, 265–282. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.G., and P.O. Foreman. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 18–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravasi, D., and M. Schultz. 2007. Organizational culture and identity at Bang & Olufsen. In Organizational identity in practice, ed. L. Lerpold, D. Ravasi, J. van Rekom, and G. Soenen, 103–120. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S.G., and V.R. Lane. 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. The Academy of Management Review 25(1): 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soenen, G., P. Monin, and A. Rouzies. 2007. Projecting organizational identity through organizational dress at Air France, 1933–2005. In Organizational identity in practice, ed. L. Lerpold, D. Ravasi, J. van Rekom, and G. Soenen, 174–196. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanske, S. 2016. Organizational identity and its applications: A direction for further research. In Organizational identity and firm growth: Properties of growth, contextual identities and micro-level processes, ed. C. Dörrenbächer, M. Tomenendal, and S. Stanske, in this volume. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanske, S., M. Tomenendal, and C. Dörrenbächer. 2016. Organizational identity in management consulting firms: Professional partnerships and managed professional businesses compared. In Organizational identity and firm growth: Properties of growth, contextual identities and micro-level processes, ed. C. Dörrenbächer, M. Tomenendal, and S. Stanske, in this volume. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimpert, L., and I. Duhaime. 2010. Cognition and decision making in diversified firms. Advances in Business Research 1(1): 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M., and G. Gavetti. 2000. Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21(10–11): 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., J. Tienari, and O. Irrmann. 2007. Crafting an international identity. The Nordea case. In Organizational identity in practice, ed. L. Lerpold, D. Ravasi, J. van Rekom, and G. Soenen, 215–232. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vora, D., and T. Kostova. 2007. A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(3): 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., G.S. Mort, P.W. Liesch, and G. Knight. 2007. Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business 42(3): 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D.A. 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry 15(3): 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D.A., and P.C. Godfrey (eds.). 1998. Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38(2): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., J. Hayton, J. Marcel, and H. O’Neill. 2001. Fostering entrepreneurship during international expansion: Managing key challenges. European Management Journal 19(4): 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dörrenbächer, C., Lappe, C. (2017). Organizational Identity and International Firm Growth: Some Theoretical Considerations. In: Dörrenbächer, C., Tomenendal, M., Stanske, S. (eds) Organizational Identity and Firm Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57724-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics