Advertisement

Pragmatic Internationalism

Chapter
  • 287 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter draws together findings from the case studies to compare claims and draw conclusions about Obama’s grand strategy. It applies the project’s proposed framework (scope, substance, and orientation) for analyzing the content and feedback of grand strategies, and it concludes that Obama’s approach to grand strategy is a self-consciously internationalist and pragmatic approach to retrenchment. However, whether Obama’s grand strategy was effective or fruitful remains a point of serious debate. This chapter argues that evaluated by its own standards, the Obama administration failed to achieve many of its goals. Specifically, the strategy itself may have been sound; however, Obama and his team failed to project power to compensate for perceptions of weakness that often arise with strategic inaction.

Keywords

Obama administration Strategic inaction Pragmatic internationalism Retrenchment 

References

  1. Baker, Peter. 2014. Pressure rising as Obama works to rein in Russia. The New York Times, March 3, A1.Google Scholar
  2. Dueck, Colin. 2015. The Obama doctrine: American grand strategy today. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Eilperin, Juliet. 2014. Obama: Cautious foreign policy ‘avoids errors.’ The Washington Post, April 29, A7.Google Scholar
  4. Heninger, Daniel. 2011. The collapse of internationalism; the Obama foreign-policy team utterly fails its first real-world test in Libya. The Wall Street Journal, March 17, A17.Google Scholar
  5. Hirsh, Michael. 2014. Team of bumblers?. Politico, October 26. Retrieved from www.politico.com
  6. Holder, R. Ward, and Peter B. Josephson. 2012. The irony of Barack Obama: Barack Obama, Reinhold Niebuhr and the problem of Christian statecraft. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Ignatius, David. 2011. Acting as police chief. The Washington Post, March 29, A21.Google Scholar
  8. Ignatius, David. 2014. An antiterror plan, in principle. The Washington Post, July 11, A19.Google Scholar
  9. Indyk, Martin S., Kenneth G. Lieberthal, and Michael E. O’Hanlon. 2012. Bending history: Barack Obama’s foreign policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  10. Katulis, Brian. 2014. 2014: A year of wake-up calls in foreign policy. The Wall Street Journal, December 19. Retrived from www.wsj.com
  11. Mann, James. 2012. The Obamians: The struggle inside the White House to redefine American power. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  12. Nau, Henry R. 2013. Conservative internationalism: Armed diplomacy under Jefferson, Polk, Truman, and Reagan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. The Obama doctrine. 2011. Editorial. The Wall Street Journal, March 12, A14.Google Scholar
  14. Rhode, David, and Warren Strobel. 2014. The micromanager in chief. The Atlantic, Global, last updated October 31. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com
  15. Sanger, David E. 2014. Deterrence revisited. The New York Times, May 24, Sunday Review.Google Scholar
  16. Stephens, Bret. 2011. The Libya mission was ‘never about regime change.’ The Wall Street Journal March 28, A17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of West FloridaPensacolaUSA

Personalised recommendations