Abstract
The victory of the EuroMaidan, with Yanukovich’s flight to Russia in February 2014, once again raised hopes of real change, reminiscent of the days of the Orange Revolution. Two years of governing by the new leaders is of course too short a time frame to render a definitive judgment, particularly since a full presidential election took place only in May 2014, and a new parliament, prime minister and permanent cabinet was not fully in place until December 2014.
‘We have launched a number of important and very
difficult reforms. However, the public wants more.’
President Poroshenko Speech, Feb.15, 2016
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
That the war should not be made an excuse for inadequate progress on reforms will be argued in the final section of the chapter.
- 2.
The author, along with four other foreign advisors to the government at the time, wrote several articles in the Ukrainian press arguing that the opportunity was ripe for far greater reforms, even on the fiscal side. They included Anders Aslund; Basil Kalymon of the Ivey School; Kahha Bendukidze, former minister of economy in Georgia; and Daron Acemoglu of MIT.
- 3.
Aslund (2015).
- 4.
Schadler (2014) typifies the sceptical position.
- 5.
Though there is a minor, forgivable, exaggeration in this: the improvement is said to have been from 2014 to 2015; in fact Table 8.2 shows most of it came in 2014.
- 6.
Turkmenistan is not included in the sample as it does not allow such an exercise.
- 7.
This section relies largely on media reports from Ukraine, in particular the weekly summaries of the Ukraine Crisis Media Centre.
- 8.
All citations concerning the EU are from the EU website.
- 9.
Ukraine Crisis Media Centre, 24–30 November 2015.
- 10.
Reported in Ekonomichna Pravda (2015).
- 11.
Freedom House (2015) Freedom in the World 2015, accessed at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2015/table-country-ratings on 15.01.2016. Note the ratings are for the year 2014; ratings for 2015 were not yet available at the time of writing.
- 12.
The Economist (2015).
- 13.
Khmara (2016), p. 2.
- 14.
Poshva (2015).
Bibliography
Applebaum, A. (2015, October 29). Ukraine battles a second enemy: Corruption, The New York Times.
Aslund, A. (2015). Ukraine two years after Euromaidan: What has been accomplished ? Washington DC: The Atlantic Council Blogs.
Barnes, A. (2015). Tenth time’s a charm? IMF loans and conditionality in Ukraine. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 408, December 2015. Washington, DC: The George Washington University Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies.
Ekonomichna Pravda. (2015, December 23). Rik reform v Ukrainyi (A year of reforms in Ukraine). Kyiv: Pravda Ukrainy.
Khmara, O. (2016, February 11). Anti-corruption policy in Ukraine. Brussels: Report of Transparency International Ukraine, presented to second meeting of the EU-Ukraine Civil Society Platform.
Motyl, A. (2016). The negativists are wrong on Ukraine, World Affairs Journal. website. Accessed 23 Jan 2016.
Poshva, B. (2015, December 17). Action plan for rule of law in Ukraine. The Kyiv Post.
Schadler, S. (2014). Ukraine: Stress at the IMF (Policy brief no. 49). Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
The Economist. (2015, December 12). Making Joe Biden mad as hell. pp. 53–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Havrylyshyn, O. (2017). Reforms and Performance under Poroshenko. 2014–Present. In: The Political Economy of Independent Ukraine. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57690-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57690-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57689-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57690-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)