Advertisement

Finnish Cinema pp 227-246 | Cite as

Conclusion: The Transnational Persistence of National Cinemas

  • Henry BaconEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave European Film and Media Studies book series (PEFMS)

Abstract

The study of the transnational aspects of a small nation cinema throughout its history entails first of all systematically collecting data in a variety of ways, ranging from thorough exploration of relevant archives to developing methods for comparative stylistics. The data then has to be interpreted in the light of our increasing understanding of why certain decisions were made in the context in which people operated, taking into account the practical, economic and technical constraints, focusing especially on how their horizons of expectation were formed between the desire to create and maintain a genuinely national film culture on the one hand, and to relate to a variety of developments abroad on the other. All this makes sense only in relation to how such developments were conditioned by the vicissitudes of social, political and ideological changes that have connected the nation with the rest of the world. At times interpretation has to be somewhat speculative due to the unavailability of materials: certain statistics have been systematically collected only after a certain point in time, both films and archival materials have disappeared or are for compelling—and sometimes quite obscure—reasons not available (see the Appendix for statistics compiled by Outi Hupaniittu and her account of the availability, or lack, of relevant data). Nevertheless, reasonably reliable estimates can be made on the basis of surviving public statements, company records and reminiscences by business professionals, cultural critics and commentators as well as members of the audience. Through such records we can form a focused idea of what different people thought about their national cinema in respect of transnational developments that were taking place.

Keywords

Film Production Film Industry Stylistic Analysis Small Nation Critical Cinema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. European Audiovisual Observatory. (2015). Box office up in the European Union in 2014 as European films break market share record. Press release 05/05/2015. Available online: http://www.obs.coe.int/en/-/pr-cannes-2015-film-market-trends-2014. Accessed 17 June 2015.
  2. Andrew, D. (2010). Time zones and jetlag: The flows and phases of world cinema. In N. Durovicová & K. Newman (Eds.), World cinemas, transnational perspectives (pp. 59–89). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ďurovičová, N., & Newman, K. (Eds.). (2010). World cinemas, transnational perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Hayward, S. (2000). Sociological scope of national cinema. In M. Hjort & S. Mackenzie (Eds.), Cinema & nation (pp. 19–31). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Higson, A. (2000). Limiting imagination of national cinema. In M. Hjort & S. Mackenzie (Eds.), Cinema & nation (pp. 15–25). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Hjort, M. (2000). Themes of nation. In M. Hjort & S. Mackenzie (Eds.), Cinema & nation (pp. 103–117). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hjort, M. (2005a). From epiphanic culture to circulation: The dynamic of globalization in Nordic cinema. In A. Nestingen & T. G. Elkington (Eds.), Transnational cinema in a global North. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hjort, M. (2005b). Small nation, global cinema—The new Danish cinema. Minneapolis/London: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hjort, M., & Petrie, D. (2007a). Introduction. In M. Hjort & D. Petrie (Eds.), The cinema of small nations (pp. 1–19). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hjort, M., & Petrie, D. (Eds.). (2007b). The cinema of small nations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hupaniittu, O. (2015). Elokuva, teatteri ja tilasto—Suomalainen elokuvateatteritoiminta määrällisessä analyysissä. Lähikuva, 29, 6–26.Google Scholar
  12. Kovács, A. B. (2007). Screening modernism: European art cinema, 1950–1980. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kääpä, P. (2015). A culture of reciprocity: The politics of cultural exchange in contemporary Nordic genre film. In T. Gustafsson & P. Kääpä (Eds.), Nordic genre film: Small nation film cultures in the global marketplace (pp. 242–261). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Laine, K. (1999). ’Pääosassa Suomen kansa’: Suomi-Filmi ja Suomen Filmiteollisuus kansallisen elokuvan rakentajina 1933–1939. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura & Suomen elokuva-arkisto.Google Scholar
  15. Lilius, A. (1958). Nuori mies panee toimeksi. Orig. Ung man i farten (trans: Vuoristo, A.). Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
  16. Seppälä, J. (2015). On the heterogeneity of cinematography in the films of Aki Kaurismäki. Projections, 9(2), 20–39.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, K. (2005). Herr Lubitsch Goes to Hollywood: German and American Film after World War 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uusitalo, K. (1972). Eläviksi syntyneet kuvat—Suomalaisen elokuvan mykät vuodet 1898–1930. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Film and Television StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations