The Troubled Socialising Agent: Democratic Governance and the African Union’s Quest to Become an Independent Foreign Policy Actor

  • Chris Landsberg
Part of the Contemporary African Political Economy book series (CONTAPE)


Since its establishment in 2002, the African Union (AU) has struggled to become an independent foreign policy actor in its own right. This chapter argues that despite the fact that member states have theoretically given the AU the right to act as an autonomous foreign policy architect to support democratisation efforts—especially as a foreign policy “socializing agent”—they have consistently ignored its demands. The central theme of this chapter then is that the AU is seeking to assert its authority as an independent socialising actor capable of superseding African states’ individual actions, but has struggled to achieve tangible outcomes in this regard due to an “implementation gap.” At the heart of this “implementation gap” is the tendency for members of the AU to undermine the authority of the AU and its organs to pursue selfinterested foreign policies, which has resulted in the AU’s generally unsuccessful attempts to fight for relevance and authority.


  1. Adebajo, A., and C. Landsberg. 2001. The Heirs of Nkrumah: Africa’s New Investments. Pugwash Occasional Papers 2 (1), January, Pugwash Online: 6–7. Available at Accessed on 12 March 2016.
  2. African Governance Newsletter, African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, Explanatory Note 1 (01), January–March 2011: 28–30.Google Scholar
  3. African Union, Constitutive Act of the African Union, Addis Ababa. 2001.Google Scholar
  4. African Union, Protocol Relating to the Establishment of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union, Addis Ababa. 2002.Google Scholar
  5. African Union, Audit Report of the African Union, Addis Ababa. 2007.Google Scholar
  6. African Union, African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, Adopted at the Eight Ordinary Session of the Assembly, Addis Ababa, 30 January 2007. Entered into Force on 15 February 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Akinsanya, O. 2016. The African Union as Regional and Global Actor. Paper Presented at the Centre for Conflict Resolution on the “African Union—Regional and Global Challenges”, 26–30 April 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA). 2016. Current Democratic Realities in Africa: Where Are We Headed Beyond the Vote? 20–21 October 2016. Johannesburg: Crowne Plaza Hotel. Google Scholar
  9. Gruzd, S. 2007. Peace, Security and the African Peer Review Mechanism: Are the Tools up to the Task? African Security Review 16 (3), September: 54–66.Google Scholar
  10. Kagame, P. 2017. The Imperative to Strengthen Our Union: Report on the Proposed Recommendations for the Institutional Reform of the African Union”, Assembly/AU/Dec.606(XXVII), 12 January 2017. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  11. Kegley, C.W. 2007. World Politics: Trend and Transformation, 11th ed. Belmont: Thomson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  12. Mingst, K.A. 2008. Essentials of International Relations, 4th ed. W.W. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Sarkin, J. 2010. The Responsibility to Protect and Humanitarian Intervention in Africa. Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (4), October: 383–386.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, African Union, and United Nations Development Programme. 2013. Democratisation and Peace-building in Africa: Policy Reflections and Prospects, Background Paper, November. Addis Ababa: AU, UNECA, UNDP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Landsberg
    • 1
  1. 1.African Diplomacy and Foreign PolicyUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations