Skip to main content

In Transition, But to Where?: Winnicott, Integration, and Democratic Associations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
D.W. Winnicott and Political Theory

Abstract

Over the past decade, democratic theory has been becoming increasingly concerned with the social, cultural, and ecological environments that facilitate democratic subjectivities. In this context, scholars often turn to D.W. Winnicott. McIvor moves beyond a theory of democratic transitional objects to consider the developmental trajectory of the holding environment. Beyond objects of civic attachment, citizens need the capacity for negotiating conflict, which can be best approached through Winnicott’s concept of “integration.” McIvor argues that the difficult work of (democratic) integration is reflected in what Lichterman calls “reflexive” associations. Democratic associations (and selves) need spaces of antagonism and mutualistic collaboration in order to facilitate integration. By contrast, standard forms of civic volunteerism do little to develop citizens’ capacities for integration and, in turn, feed “false” selfhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alford, C.F. 2006. Psychology and the Natural Law of Reparation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Trauma and Forgiveness: Consequences and Community. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. 1963. The Fire Next Time. New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D.W.M. 2013. Oligarchy or Elite Democracy: Aristotle and Modern Representative Government. New Political Science 35(4): 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 2015. Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. 2012. After Sandy, Wired New Yorkers Get Reconnected With Pay Phones. The Wall Street Journal, October 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. 2013. The Communist Horizon. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, N. 2011. Making Volunteers: Civic Life After Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. 2001. Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Politics of Public Things: Neoliberalism and the Routine of Privatization. NoFo 10: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Public Things: Jonathan Lear’s Radical Hope, Lars von Trier’s Melancholia, and the Democratic Need. Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1997. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Freedom’s Right. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. 2013. We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. 2005. Elusive Togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America’s Divisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Social Capital or Group Style? Rescuing Tocqueville’s Insights on Civic Engagement. Theory and Society 35(5–6): 529–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Social Capacity and the Styles of Group Life: Some Inconvenient Wellsprings of Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist 52(6): 846–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxon, N. 2013. Crisis of Authority: Politics, Truth, and Truth-Telling in Freud and Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Beyond Mourning and Melancholia: Nostalgia, Anger and the Challenges of Political Action. Contemporary Political Theory 15: 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, D.W. 2015. The Cunning of Recognition: Melanie Klein and Contemporary Critical Theory. Contemporary Political Theory. doi: 10.20157/cpt.2015.47

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Mourning in America: Race and the Politics of Loss. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. 1988. Winnicott. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, G. 2011. Acknowledgement and Disavowal as an Idiom for Theorizing Politics. Theory & Event 14: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standley, F.L., and L.H. Pratt. 1989. Conversations with James Baldwin. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. 1971. Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Home Is Where We Start From: Essays by a Psychoanalyst. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J.A. 2012. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J.A., and B.I. Page. 2009. Oligarchy in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 731–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. 2008. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McIvor, D.W. (2017). In Transition, But to Where?: Winnicott, Integration, and Democratic Associations. In: Bowker, M., Buzby, A. (eds) D.W. Winnicott and Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57533-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics