Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to reflect upon the question to what extent contemporary politics is only the eristic technique skilled at introducing pathos and instrumentally appealing to logos and ethos . Aristotle’s rhetorical triad—logos, ethos , pathos —makes rhetoric the art of persuasive or honest communication . Symbolic violence requires no active inculcation, no persuasive effort, and no intentional influence. Any realistic analysis of effecting power and politics must begin with the analysis of this initial acceptance of the world . Of all the forms of subcutaneous persuasion, the most relentless and insidious is that which is disguised as the “order of things” and, when granted, is its acceptance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 170–186). New York: Monthly Review Press.
Apel, K. O. (1994). Selected essays: Towards a transcendental semiotics, (E. Mendieta, Trans.). New Jersey: Prometheus Books.
Aristotle. (2006). Rhetoric. Poetics, S. H. Butcher‚ (W. Rhys Roberts, Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power‚ (J. B. Thompson, & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination‚ (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity‚ (R. Nice, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
Cicero, M. T. (2010). Cicero on the complete orator. In Three Books or Dialogues, Inscribed to His Brother Quintus, (George Barnes, Trans.). London: Gale Ecco, Print Editions.
Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Writing and difference, (Alan Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 278–294.
Derrida, J. (1998). Monolingualism of the other, or, the prosthesis of origin, (P. Mensah, Trans.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech. J. Pearson (Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, M. (2011). The courage of truth, (The government of self and others II) lectures at the college de france, 1983–1984. (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Freud, S. (1901). Psychopathology of everyday life. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of sigmund freud, (J. Strachey, (Ed.), Trans.). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1960, 6: 258.
Habermas, J. (2001a). On the pragmatics of social interaction. Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action, (B. Fultner, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2001b). The liberating power of symbols: Philosophical essays, (P. Dews, Trans.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Lacan, J. (2006). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. (B. Fink, Trans.)‚ In J. Lacan, J. Ecrits: The first complete edition in English. New York/London: W. W. Norton.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London/New York: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2014). The rhetorical foundations of society. London/New York: Verso.
Norval, A. J. (2007). Aversive democracy. Inheritance and originality in the democratic tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perelman, Ch. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities: Essays on rhetoric and its applications. New York: Springer.
Rancière, J. (1994). Post-democracy, politics and philosophy, interview with J. Sumic and R. Riha. In D. Howarth & A. J. Norval (Eds.), Angelaki, Journal Of The Theoretical Humanities, 174.
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London/New York: Continuum.
Rancière, J. (2011). Mute speech: Literature, critical theory and aesthetics, (J. Swenson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosen, S. (1987). Hermeneutics as politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schulzke, M. (2015). Power and resistance: Linking gramsci and foucault. In K. David (Ed.), Gramsci and foucault: A reassessment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, L. (1987). Plato. In Leo Strauss & Joseph Cropsey (Eds.), History of political philosophy (pp. 33–89). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thucydides. (2009). The peloponnesian war, (M. Hammond, Trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations, (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wróbel, S. (2017). Logos, Ethos, Pathos or a Politics of Errors. In: Auestad, L., Treacher Kabesh, A. (eds) Traces of Violence and Freedom of Thought. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57502-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57502-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57501-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57502-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)