Skip to main content

Comparative Study of Public and Social Services Provision: Definitions, Concepts and Methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

In the introductory chapter, three distinguishing features of the book are highlighted: First, unlike most available comparative studies that deal separately with public and personal social services, the chapters of this volume comparatively comprise service sectors. Second, its country coverage is distinctly wider than most available studies especially by including Central Eastern European ‘transformation’ countries. Third, in pursuing a ‘developmental’ (historical) approach the book chapters, after discussing service provision in the post-1945 ‘advanced welfare’ state and its subsequent ‘neo-liberal’ (New Public Management, NPM) driven re-organisation (from public/municipal to private sector), focus on the most recent (‘post-NPM’) phase in part marked by a ‘comeback’ of the public/municipal sector (‘remunicipalisation’).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauby, P., & Similie, M. (2014). Europe. In UCLG (Ed.), Basic services for all in an urbanizing world (GOLD III) (pp. 94–130). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A quality framework for services of general interest in Europe. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/services_general_interest/docs/comm_quality_framework_en.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2015.

  • Grossi, G., Marcou, G., & Reichard, C. (2010). Comparative aspects of institutional variants for local public service provision. In H. Wollmann & G. Marcou (Eds.), The provision of public services in Europe. Between state, local government and market (pp. 217–239). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (2012). Re-municipalising municipal services in Europe. A report commissioned by EPSU to Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU). Available from www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/Redraft_DH_remunicipalization.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2015.

  • Heinelt, H., & Hlepas, N. (2006). Typologies of local government systems. In H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, & A. Magnier (Eds.), The European Mayor (pp. 21–42). Wiesbaden: Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, J. J., & Sharpe, L. J. (1990). Local government in international perspective. In J. J. Hesse & L. J. Sharpe (Eds.), Local government and urban affairs in international perspective (pp. 603–621). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Public administration and administrative reforms in Europe. An introduction in comparative public administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, M. (2005). Public and private enterprise in Europe: Energy, telecommunication and transport 1830–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenkamp, H. (2013). From state to market revisited. Empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises, MPRA paper. Available from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47570. Accessed 17 July 2015.

  • Munday, B. (2000). Privatisation of social services in the United Kingdom. In H. Wollmann & E. Schröter (Eds.), Comparing public sector reform in Britain and Germany (pp. 264–284). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E., & Goldsmith, M. (1987). Central and local government relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2011). Institutional theory in political science. The ‘New Institutionalism’ (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns. Path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röber, M. (2009). Privatisierung ade? Rekommunalisierung öffentlicher Dienstleistungen im Lichte des Public Managements. Verwaltung und Management, 15(5), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centred institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism. The explanatory power of ideas and discourses. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (2010). Power and progress. The swing of the pendulum. Journal of Human Development and Capacities, 11(3), 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsteinsen, H., & van Genugtsen, M. (2016). Municipal waste management in Norway and the Netherlands—From in-house provision to intermunicipal cooperation. In S. Kuhlmann & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local public sector reforms in times of crisis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, S. (2012). Comparing agencies across countries. In K. Verhoest, S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, & P. Lægreid (Eds.), Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries (pp. 18–26). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wollmann, H. (2014). Public services in European countries. Between public/municipal and private sector provision—And reverse? In C. Nunes & J. Bucek (Eds.), Fiscal Austerity and innovation in local governance in Europe (pp. 49–76). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollmann, H., & Marcou, G. (2010). From public sector—Based to privatized service provision. Is the pendulum swinging back again? Comparative summary. In H. Wollmann & G. Marcou (Eds.), The provision of public services in Europe. Between state, local government and market (pp. 240–260). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wollmann, H. (2016). Comparative Study of Public and Social Services Provision: Definitions, Concepts and Methodologies. In: Wollmann, H., Koprić, I., Marcou, G. (eds) Public and Social Services in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57499-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics