Advertisement

Competitive Interdependence: Transatlantic Relations and Global Economic Governance

  • Chad Damro
Chapter
  • 707 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

Damro investigates how the transatlantic relationship affects global and regional economic governance His analysis is guided by the concept of ‘competitive interdependence’. Largely in response to the stalemate in the World Trade Organization’s Doha Round negotiations, the European Union and the United States now prioritize and compete in the pursuit of bilateral agreements with largely economic objectives. But the relationship also has a firm basis for interdependence, especially when considering the characteristics of market size and institutional features. Against this background, the chapter assesses the ways in which competition and interdependence drive the negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and investigates the likely implications of such an agreement for transatlantic relations and global and regional economic governance more generally.

Keywords

Transatlantic economy TTIP Global governance 

References

  1. Ahearn, R. J. (2009). Transatlantic regulatory cooperation: Background and analysis. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, D., & Newman, A. (2007). The European regulatory state and global public policy: Micro-institutions, macro-influence. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 827–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. da Conceição-Heldt, E. (2014). Adaptation and change in EU trade governance: The EU’s paradigm shift from multilateralism to regionalism and bilateralism. In M. Moschella & C. Weaver (Eds.), Handbook of global economic governance: Players, power and paradigms (pp. 57–69). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 682–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Gucht, K. (2013). Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: Opening free trade negotiations with the United States. Speech to Committee on International Trade (INTA) of the European Parliament, Brussels, 21 February, speech 13/147. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150581.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  6. Dreyer, I. (2012). Trade policy in the EU’s neighbourhood: Ways forward for the deep and comprehensive free trade agreements (Studies and research 90). Brussels: Notre Europe.Google Scholar
  7. Drezner, D. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Europa. (2005). Council of the European Union, ‘EU-US Declaration: Initiative to enhance transatlantic economic integration and growth’. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/international/files/economic_initiative_summit_05_en.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  9. Europa. (2006). Directorate-General Trade, ‘European Union factsheet: The positive economic agenda’. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/june/tradoc_114066.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  10. Europa. (2012). Directorate-General Trade, ‘Countries: United States’. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/creating-opportunities/bilateral-relations/countries/united-states/. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  11. Europa. (2013). European Commission Press release database, ‘Independent study outlines benefits of EU-US trade agreement’. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-211_en.htm. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  12. Europa. (2015a). Directorate-General Trade, ‘EU trade relations worldwide—a map’. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/june/tradoc_149622.jpg. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  13. Europa. (2015b). Directorate-General Trade, ‘Investment’. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/investment/. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  14. Europa. (2015c). Directorate-General Trade, ‘TTIP’. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ttip/. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  15. European Commission. (2013a). Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: The regulatory part. Brussels: European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/july/tradoc_151605.pdf
  16. European Commission. (2013b). Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: The economic analysis explained. Brussels: European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/september/tradoc_151787.pdf#world
  17. Fabry, E., Garbasso, G., & Pardo, R. (2014). The TTIP negotiations: A Pirandello play. Notre Europe and European Policy Centre. http://www.notre-europe.eu/media/ttipnegotiationsfabrygarbassopardone-jdijan14.pdf?pdf=ok
  18. Francois, J. (2013). Reducing transatlantic barriers to trade and investment: An economic assessment. Final project report, Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/march/tradoc_150737.pdf
  19. Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, D. S., & Quinlan, J. P. (2015). The transatlantic economy 2015: Annual survey of jobs, trade and investment between the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  21. High Level Working Group. (2013, February 11). Final report. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/february/tradoc_150519.pdf
  22. Horn, H., Mavroidis, P., & Sapir, A. (2010). Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements. World Economy, 33(11), 1565–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGuire, S., & Smith, M. (2008). The European Union and the United States: Convergence and competition in the global arena. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Meunier, S., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2006). The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sbragia, A. (2010). The EU, the US, and trade policy: Competitive interdependence in the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaffer, G., & Pollack, M. (2008). How hard and soft law interact in international regulatory governance: Alternatives, complements or antagonists? (Working paper 45/08). Society of International Economic Law, Online Proceedings. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1156867
  27. Smith, M. P. (2012). Environmental and health regulation in the United States and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, M., & Steffenson, R. (2011). The EU and the United States. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), International relations and the European Union (2nd ed., pp. 404–431). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Tocci, N., & Alcaro, R. (2014). Rethinking transatlantic relations in a multipolar era. International Politics, 51(3), 366–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Transworld. (2014). Transworld elite survey: Topline data. Transworld. http://www.transworld-fp7.eu/?cat=86. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.Google Scholar
  31. United States Mission to the European Union. (1998). Transatlantic economic partnership. http://useu.usmission.gov/transatlantic_economic_partnership.html. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  32. United States Trade Representative. (2015a). Trade agreements. http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  33. United States Trade Representative. (2015b). United States trade representative, ‘Free trade agreements’. http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  34. United States Trade Representative. (2015c). United States trade representative, ‘Trade and investment framework agreements’. http://www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements/trade-investment-framework-agreements. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  35. United States Trade Representative. (2015d). United States Office of Trade Negotiations and Compliance, ‘Bilateral investment treaties’. http://tcc.export.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral_Investment_Treaties/index.asp. Accessed 7 Sept 2015.
  36. Vogel, D. (2012). The politics of precaution: Regulating health, safety, and environmental risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Young, A. R., & Peterson, J. (2006). The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chad Damro
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations