Advertisement

Conclusion

Chapter
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the main findings of this book. It casts some doubt on the overall applicability of the exposure model and concludes that the ties to the global level have stronger effects on topics that gained salience more recently. This, however, does not exclude the possibility that these forces had a powerful role in the past in establishing now taken-for-granted political and civic rights.

References and Further Readings

  1. Bromley, P., and W. Powell. 2012. From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. The Academy of Management Annals 6: 483–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleiß, J., F. Höllinger, and H. Kuzmics. 2009. Nationalstolz zwischen Patriotismus und Nationalismus? Empirisch-methodologische Analysen und Reflexionen am Beispiel des International Social Survey Programme 2003 ‘National Identity’. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 19 (3): 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank, D.J., S.A. Boutcher, and B. Camp. 2009. The Reform of Sodomy Laws from a World Society Perspective. In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, ed. S. Barclay, M. Bernstein, and A.-M. Marshall, 123–141. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Givens, J., and A.K. Jorgenson. 2013. Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity: A Multilevel Analysis. Social Science Research 42: 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadler, M. 2016. Individual Action, World Society, and Environmental Change: 1993–2010. European Journal of Political and Cultural Sociology 3 (2–3): 341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hadler, M., and M. Haller. 2011. Global Activism and Nationally Driven Recycling: The Influence of World Society and National Contexts on Public and Private Environmental Behavior. International Sociology 26: 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hadler, M., and J. Symons. 2017. Divergent Trends in Homophobia and Its Reflection in Public Attitudes. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Canada, August.Google Scholar
  8. Hafner-Fink, M., M. Hadler, F. Höllinger, and S. Uhan. 2017. Probing the ISSP Social Inequality Module. Results of a Study in Austria and Slovenia. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the ISSP, Lausanne, CH, April.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, J.W. 2007. Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. In Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Shalin-Andersson, 788–809. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Pierotti, R. 2013. Increasing Rejection of Intimate Partner Violence. Evidence of Global Cultural Diffusion. American Sociological Review 78 (2): 240–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Scott, W.R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas. Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Symons, J., and D. Altman. 2015. International Norm Polarization: Sexuality as a Subject of Human Rights Protection. International Theory 7 (1): 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Velitchkova, A. 2015. World Culture, Uncoupling, Institutional Logics, and Recoupling: Practices and Self-Identification as Institutional Microfoundations of Political Violence. Sociological Forum 30 (3): 698–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations