Advertisement

Individual Environmentalism

Chapter
  • 200 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of empirical analyses on the influence of global ideas and related factors on individual environmental behaviors. The analyses are based on data collected by the International Social Survey Programme in 1993, 2000, and 2010.

References and Further Readings

  1. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2001. Individualization. Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beckfield, J. 2010. The Social Structure of the World Polity. American Journal of Sociology 115 (4): 1018–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, H., and J. Mayerl. 2013. Postmaterialism and the Environment: A Multilevel Analysis on the ‘Objective Problems, Subjective Values’ Hypothesis Using the ISSP. Paper Presented at the WSSF, Montreal, October.Google Scholar
  5. Boli, J., and G.M. Thomas., eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boyle, E.H. 2005. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, E.H., B.J. McMorris, and M. Gomez. 2002. Local Conformity to International Norms: The Case of Female Genital Cutting. International Sociology 17 (1): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brechin, S.R. 1999. Objective Problems, Subjective Values, and Global Environmentalism: Evaluating the Postmaterialist Argument and Challenging a New Explanation. Social Science Quarterly 80 (4): 793–808.Google Scholar
  9. Bromley, P., J.W. Meyer, and F.O. Ramirez. 2011. The Worldwide Spread of Environmental Discourse in History, Civics, and Social Studies Textbooks. Comparative Education Review 55: 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton, R.J. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deeming, C., and K. Jones. 2015. Investigating the Macro Determinants of Self-Rated Health and Well-Being Using the European Social Survey: Methodological Innovations Across Nations and Time. International Journal of Sociology 45 (4): 256–285.Google Scholar
  12. Diekmann, A., and P. Preisendoerfer. 1998. Environmental Behavior. Discrepancies Between Aspirations and Reality. Rationality and Society 10: 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dietz, T., A. Fitzgerald, and R. Shwom. 2005. Environmental Values. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunlap, R.E., and R.E. Jones. 2002. Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. In Handbook of Environmental Sociology, ed. R.E. Dunlap and W. Michelson, 482–524. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, D.J., A. Hironaka, and E. Schofer. 2000. The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, D.J., and J.W. Meyer. 2002. The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Post-War Period. Sociological Theory 20: 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank, D., J. Meyer, and D. Miyahara. 1995. Individualist Polity and Professionalization of Psychology. American Sociological Review 60: 360–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franzen, A., and R. Meyer. 2010. Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review 26 (2): 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillham, P. 2008. Participation in the Environmental Movement: Analysis of the European Union. International Sociology 23: 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Givens, J., and A.K. Jorgenson. 2013. Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity: A Multilevel Analysis. Social Science Research 42: 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo, G., and H. Zhao. 2000. Multilevel Modeling for Binary Data. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadler, M. 2016. Individual Action, World Society, and Environmental Change: 1993–2010. European Journal of Political and Cultural Sociology 3 (2–3): 341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hadler, M., and M. Haller. 2011. Global Activism and Nationally Driven Recycling: The Influence of World Society and National Contexts on Public and Private Environmental Behavior. International Sociology 26: 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2013. A Shift from Public to Private Environmental Behavior: Findings from Hadler and Haller (2011) Revisited and Extended. International Sociology 28 (4): 484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hafner-Burton, E., and K. Tsutsui. 2005. Human Rights Practices in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1373–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haller, M., and M. Hadler. 2008. Dispositions to Act in Favor of the Environment: Fatalism and Readiness to Make Sacrifices in a Cross-National Perspective. Sociological Forum 23 (2): 281–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallett, T. 2010. The Myth Incarnate. Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School. American Sociological Review 75: 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardy, M., and J. Reynolds. 2004. Incorporating Categorical Information into Regression Models. The Utility of Dummy Variables. In Handbook of Data Analysis, ed. M. Hardy and A. Bryman, 229–255. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hironaka, A. 2014. Greening the Globe. World Society and Environmental Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R. 1995. Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies. Political Science and Politics 15: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jorgenson, A., C. Dick, and J. Shandra. 2011. World Economy, World Society, and Environmental Harms in Less-Developed Countries. Sociological Inquiries 81: 53–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight, K., and B. Messer. 2012. Environmental Concern in Cross-National Perspective: The Effects of Affluence, Environmental Degradation, and World Society. Social Science Quarterly 93: 521–537.Google Scholar
  33. Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J.W. Duyvendak, and M. Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  34. Longhofer, W., and E. Schofer. 2010. National and Global Origins of Environmental Association. American Sociological Review 75: 505–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marquart-Pyatt, S.T. 2012. Contextual Influence on Environmental Concern Cross-Nationally: A Multilevel Investigation. Social Science Research 41: 1085–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McAdam, D. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk-Activism. American Journal of Sociology 92: 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, J.W. 2010. World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer, J.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas, and F.O. Ramirez. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minkoff, D.C. 1997. The Sequencing of Social Movements. American Sociological Review 62 (5): 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pierotti, R. 2013. Increasing Rejection of Intimate Partner Violence. Evidence of Global Cultural Diffusion. American Sociological Review 78 (2): 240–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ramirez, F.O. 2012. The World Society Perspective: Concepts, Assumptions, and Strategies. Comparative Education 48 (4): 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schofer, E., and M. Fourcade-Gourinchas. 2001. The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective. American Sociological Review 66: 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schofer, E., and A. Hironaka. 2005. The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes. Social Forces 84: 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schofer, E., A. Hironaka, D. Frank, and W. Longhofer. 2012. Sociological Institutionalism and World Society. In The New Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, ed. E. Amenta, K. Nash, and A. Scott, 57–68. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seifert, F. 2008. Einhellige Abschottung und globalisierungskritische Bauernrevolte. Widerstand gegen die grüne Gentechnik in Österreich und Frankreich. SWS-Rundschau 48 (4): 485–504.Google Scholar
  48. Shandra, J., L. Esparza, and B. London. 2012. Nongovernmental Organizations, Democracy, and Deforestation: A Cross-National Analysis. Society and Natural Resources 25: 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shandra, J., C. Leckband, L. McKinney, and B. London. 2009. Ecologically Unequal Exchange, World Polity, and Biodiversity Loss: A Cross-National Analysis of Threatened Mammals. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50: 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shorette, K. 2012. Outcomes of Global Environmentalism: Longitudinal and Cross-National Trends in Chemical Fertilizer and Pesticide Use. Social Forces 91: 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skocpol, T. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, J., and D. Wiest. 2012. Social Movements in the World System. The Politics of Crisis and Transformation. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. Stegmueller, D. 2013. How Many Countries for Multilevel Modeling? A Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57: 748–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsutsui, K. 2004. Global Civil Society and Ethnic Social Movements in the Contemporary World. Sociological Forum 19 (1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsutsui, K., and Hwa-Ji Shin. 2008. Global Norms, Local Activism and Social Movement Outcomes: Global Human Rights and Resident Koreans in Japan. Social Problems 55: 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. UIA (Union of International Associations). Various Years. Yearbook of International Organizations. Munich, Germany: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
  57. UNEP. 2014. United Nations Environmental Programme. Geodata Portal. http://geodata.grid.unep.ch/
  58. Vasi, B. 2007. Thinking Globally, Planning Nationally, and Acting Locally. Nested Organisational Fields and the Adoption of Environmental Practices. Social Forces 86: 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Velitchkova, A. 2015. World Culture, Uncoupling, Institutional Logics, and Recoupling: Practices and Self-Identification as Institutional Microfoundations of Political Violence. Sociological Forum 30 (3): 698–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wapner, P.K. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  61. World Bank. 2014 and 2015. World Bank Open Data. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed at Various Times.
  62. Xiao, C., and A. McCright. 2012. A Test of the Biographical Availability Argument for Gender Differences in Environmental Behaviors. Environment and Behavior. Published Online Before Print, 9 Aug 2012. doi:10.1177/0013916512453991.
  63. Zhou, M. 2013. Public Support for International Human Rights Institutions: A Cross-National and Multilevel Analysis. Sociological Forum 28 (3): 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations